Hi all!
I have a server with postfix with virtual users (using MySQL), it's
working ok, let's call it A. I also have a secondary server, which I
want to use to send mails even outside my local network, let's call it
B. So I'm trying to configure B to relay through A to send e-mails. The
probl
On 2012-07-23 Marius Lewies wrote:
> We have a situation where a certain email address get the following
> error. All other mail gets relayed.
>
> SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
> TO::
> host maila.vegaspartnerlounge.dk [196.14.16.67]:
> 554 5.7.1 : Relay access denied
>
> Below
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:19:18 +0200
Marius Lewies articulated:
> I am new to Postfix and have taken over the admin thereof.
>
> We have a situation where a certain email address get the following
> error. All other mail gets relayed.
> SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
> TO:: host
Hello list,
I'm new to this list hoping to receive some help. I posted my question on June
20 on the Zarafa community page, but did not get a feedback since, so I hope
you tolerate my double posting. This is what I'm struggeling with:
I'm quit proud to say that I have sucessfully managed to ins
Please keep this on-list. You're neither family, nor personal friend,
nor paying customer, so you're not entitled to personal support.
On 2012-07-23 Marius Lewies wrote:
> Did you postmap all_ad_recipients after adding the recipient address?
> = Yes did run a ./getadusers and verified that address
Nor did I think I am. This is the first time that I am using this
forum. Instead of replying to all I mistakenly replied to yourself.
If you are not prepared to assist or help and Yes I know you ALL do it
on your own time and free will I will gladly remove myself from the
list.
-Original Me
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Marius Lewies
> Sent: 23 July 2012 14:32
> To: Ansgar Wiechers; postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: RE: Postfix Issue
>
> Nor did I think I am. This is the first time tha
-Original Message-
From: James Day [mailto:james@ontraq.com]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 3:45 PM
To: Marius Lewies; Ansgar Wiechers; postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: RE: Postfix Issue
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us
Am 23.07.2012 16:03, schrieb Marius Lewies:
please strip qutoings a little bit!
> Referring to Ansgar reply it seems that relay_domains.db is out of
> date. Ansgar suggested " You need to run the command to convert the
> (plain text) map into the database file that Postfix uses" How to do or
> -Original Message-
> From: Marius Lewies [mailto:mariu...@verpakt.com]
> Sent: 23 July 2012 15:03
> To: James Day; Ansgar Wiechers; postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: RE: Postfix Issue
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: James Day [mailto:james@ontraq.com]
> Sent: Monday,
On 7/23/2012 7:24 AM, jan...@web.de wrote:
> Hello list,
> I'm new to this list hoping to receive some help. I posted my question on
> June 20 on the Zarafa community page, but did not get a feedback since, so I
> hope you tolerate my double posting. This is what I'm struggeling with:
>
> I'm q
-Original Message-
From: James Day [mailto:james@ontraq.com]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 4:15 PM
To: Marius Lewies; Ansgar Wiechers; postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: RE: Postfix Issue
> -Original Message-
> From: Marius Lewies [mailto:mariu...@verpakt.com]
> Sent: 23 July
would you please strip your quotes a little bit
and at least remove multiple header-blocks
this starts to become complete unreadable
thank you!
Am 23.07.2012 16:39, schrieb Marius Lewies:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: James Day [mailto:james@ontraq.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 20
On 2012-07-23 Marius Lewies wrote:
> Referring to Ansgar reply it seems that relay_domains.db is out of
> date. Ansgar suggested " You need to run the command to convert the
> (plain text) map into the database file that Postfix uses" How to do
> or else, where can I find the instruction to do
Hi there,
I'd like to know if is possible to check some itens using postfix policy
delegation:
- file extensions (I could use mime_header_checks to check it globally, but I
need to accept for some groups and reject to another groups of users)
- text in subject (I could use header_checks to
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 02:28:33PM -0300, Alfredo Saldanha wrote:
> I'd like to know if is possible to check some itens using postfix
> policy delegation:
>
> - file extensions
No. Message content is not available to policy services.
> - text in subject
No. Message content is not available to
Alfredo Saldanha:
>
> Hi there,
>
>
> I'd like to know if is possible to check some itens using postfix policy
> delegation:
Message content is not available via this interface. Consider using
the interfaces for deep content inspection: SMTP-based or Milter.
Wietse
Ok,
I'm asking this, because I need do this checks according the user/group, I can
not check globally.
I'll read more about Milters.
Thank you.
- Mensagem original -
De: "Viktor Dukhovni"
Para: postfix-users@postfix.org
Enviadas: Segunda-feira, 23 de Julho de 2012 15:21:02
Hello,
Sorry for the broad question, but is there any sort of best common practice
these days regarding limiting outbound email? We recently had a customer's
account compromised (not sure if it was brute-forced or keylogged) and then the
perp proceeded to use their credentials to smtp-auth the
Transport next hops can have MX lookups disabled by adding [] around
the next hop.
Is it possible to define a transport that always has MX lookups
disabled without specifying the next hop?
man 5 transport says that trivial-rewrite(8) doesn't allow
substitutions in pcre tables, otherwise, this is
Marty Beckler:
> Transport next hops can have MX lookups disabled by adding [] around
> the next hop.
>
> Is it possible to define a transport that always has MX lookups
> disabled without specifying the next hop?
/etc/postfix/transport:
example.com smtp-no-mx:
/etc/postfix/master.cf:
sm
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:27:05PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Marty Beckler:
> > Transport next hops can have MX lookups disabled by adding [] around
> > the next hop.
> >
> > Is it possible to define a transport that always has MX lookups
> > disabled without specifying the next hop?
>
> /et
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 03:33:53PM -0700, Marty Beckler wrote:
> Transport next hops can have MX lookups disabled by adding [] around
> the next hop.
>
> Is it possible to define a transport that always has MX lookups
> disabled without specifying the next hop?
>
> man 5 transport says that triv
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Marty Beckler:
>> Transport next hops can have MX lookups disabled by adding [] around
>> the next hop.
>>
>> Is it possible to define a transport that always has MX lookups
>> disabled without specifying the next hop?
>
> /etc/postfix/transp
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 03:33:53PM -0700, Marty Beckler wrote:
>
>> Transport next hops can have MX lookups disabled by adding [] around
>> the next hop.
>>
>> Is it possible to define a transport that always has MX lookups
>> disabled with
On 7/23/2012 7:22 PM, Ori Bani wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>> What's wrong with MX lookups? If the records are absent, Postfix
>> will use A records,
>
> Interesting, for me, postfix was throwing up its hands instead.
That's not normal behavior. If possibl
On 7/23/2012 4:16 PM, CSS wrote:
> I'd like to take some measures to limit what an authenticated sender can do
> but not limit legitimate use.
See:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_client_connection_rate_limit
You would apply this to your submission service, eg:
587 inet n
On Jul 24, 2012, at 1:24 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 7/23/2012 4:16 PM, CSS wrote:
>
>> I'd like to take some measures to limit what an authenticated sender can do
>> but not limit legitimate use.
>
> See:
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_client_connection_rate_limit
>
> You w
On 7/24/2012 12:44 AM, CSS wrote:
>
> On Jul 24, 2012, at 1:24 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> On 7/23/2012 4:16 PM, CSS wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to take some measures to limit what an authenticated sender can do
>>> but not limit legitimate use.
>>
>> See:
>> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#
29 matches
Mail list logo
