I have setup a throttling postfix based on http://flurdy.com/docs/postfix/ and
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/271370 .
In the virtual domains tables I have: localhost, localhost.localdomain and
my.domain.com .
transport:
hotmail.com hotmailratelimit:
In our configuration the final delivery mail server is not listed in
the MX records for the various domains that we host. Instead the
highest priority MX hosts relay directly to the common final delivery
host using transport maps and disabling MX lookups:
example.com relay:[delivery.domain.
James B. Byrne:
> Given the requirement for the transport map on the MX hosts does the
> relay_domains value need to be set at all?
If the destination is not on the machine itself, the destination
should be listed in relay_domains.
transport_maps is not a substitute for relay_domains (think, for
On Wed, June 13, 2012 12:23, Wietse Venema wrote:
> James B. Byrne:
>> Given the requirement for the transport map on the MX hosts does the
>> relay_domains value need to be set at all?
>
> If the destination is not on the machine itself, the destination
> should be listed in relay_domains.
Thank
James B. Byrne:
>
> On Wed, June 13, 2012 12:23, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > James B. Byrne:
> >> Given the requirement for the transport map on the MX hosts does the
> >> relay_domains value need to be set at all?
> >
> > If the destination is not on the machine itself, the destination
> > should be
On Wed, June 13, 2012 13:40, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Please do not confuse RECEIVE controls with DELIVERY controls.
>
> transport_maps determines how to DELIVER a domain.
>
> relay_domains determines what domains to RECEIVE for forwarding,
>
Thank you. I now understand why my test passed when it
On 6/13/2012 4:34 AM, Adrian Gibanel wrote:
> I have setup a throttling postfix based on
> http://flurdy.com/docs/postfix/ and
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/271370 .
> In the virtual domains tables I have: localhost,
> localhost.localdomain and my.domain.com .
>
> tran
Can a SQL database be used for the recipient verification storage?
--
Daniel
Daniel L. Miller:
> Can a SQL database be used for the recipient verification storage?
Not unless someone has implemented Postfix support for SQL updates.
Wietse
Greetings
it has been a long time since I've done this, and could use some guidance.
I have one domain ( example.com ) and 7 systems.
mx1.example.com
Av1.example.com
relay1.example.com
relay2.exmple.com
imap/pop1
imap/pop2
imap/pop3
each understand their own /etc/aliases file. if I send a messag
On Jun 13, 2012, at 9:39 PM, jeffrey j donovan wrote:
> Greetings
> it has been a long time since I've done this, and could use some guidance.
>
> I have one domain ( example.com ) and 7 systems.
>
> mx1.example.com
> Av1.example.com
> relay1.example.com
> relay2.exmple.com
> imap/pop1
> imap/p
11 matches
Mail list logo