With regard to
http://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg44135.html
I am on the Exim end of this problem, or at least some of the servers I
use are, and I'm having trouble convincing the admins for these Exim
servers that it is a problem they need to fix.
In an attempt to do t
Hi Wietse,
[ just subscribed to the list, I realized that our past conversation
was dropped since I was not subscribed, never mind ]
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 08:16:53PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Willy Tarreau:
> > > >Regardless of command format details, if the proxy prepends a command
> > >
Replying to myself,
Jun 8 07:10:03 ip-10-160-125-11 postfix/smtp[4735]: >
example.com[72.34.48.xxx]:25: DATA
Jun 8 07:10:03 ip-10-160-125-11 postfix/smtp[4735]: <
example.com[72.34.48.xxx]:25: 250 OK
I believe that this is the problem, the correct response from the
"busted server" shou
Hello,
i use virtual user and virtual domains in postfix with mysql.
to existing users the mails will be delivered.
but when i create a alias (postfixadmin), the mail is bounced.
Jun 8 10:50:40 mail dovecot: auth-worker: sql(postmas...@zbfxxx.de):
Unknown user
Jun 8 10:50:40 mail postfix/pip
* Marko Weber :
>
> Hello,
>
> i use virtual user and virtual domains in postfix with mysql.
> to existing users the mails will be delivered.
> but when i create a alias (postfixadmin), the mail is bounced.
>
> Jun 8 10:50:40 mail dovecot: auth-worker: sql(postmas...@zbfxxx.de):
> Unknown user
share [fb] share [tw]
This is header of mail that i have received from mailchimp:
Return-Path:
bounce-mc.us2_6034522.1358370-achal.tomar58=gmail@mail76.us2.mcsv.net>
Received: from mail76.us2.mcsv.net (mail76.us2.mcsv.net. [173.231.139.76])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id
er6
A bit of a strange request, but is there a simple way to have Postfix
continually defer mail to a specific recipient, say mail to
'defer.t...@domain.tld' ?
I know with header checks I can do magic like rejecting mail with 5xx
errors, but looking through http://www.postfix.org/header_checks.5.html
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 11:26 +0100, Sam Jones wrote:
> A bit of a strange request, but is there a simple way to have Postfix
> continually defer mail to a specific recipient, say mail to
> 'defer.t...@domain.tld' ?
>
> I know with header checks I can do magic like rejecting mail with 5xx
> errors,
achal tomar:
> My query is how they add the received from header to the Return-Path
> dyanamically,i also want to implement the same in my mail server,i have
Return-Path is defined in RFC 5321 and RFC 5322. This is the
envelope sender address (MAIL FROM in SMTP).
Wietse
>>Peter S?rensen:
>> Hi
>>
>> I have a policy server restricting access to specific lists. If a
>> user is accepted the policy server return OK status
>> to postfix. The members on the list are found through virtual alias
>> and gets expanded.
>>
>> I would like to put a content filter after this
James:
> Replying to myself,
>
> > Jun 8 07:10:03 ip-10-160-125-11 postfix/smtp[4735]: >
> > example.com[72.34.48.xxx]:25: DATA
> > Jun 8 07:10:03 ip-10-160-125-11 postfix/smtp[4735]: <
> > example.com[72.34.48.xxx]:25: 250 OK
>
> I believe that this is the problem, the correct response f
Thanks for telling me about the RFC,but i want to know what configuration
changes i have to do in postfix to achieve my goal.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/ADDRESS-MASQUEREADING-POSTFIX-tp33980124p33980931.html
Sent from the Postfix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Willy Tarreau:
> > Either you need to update the protocol spec (require non-fragmented
> > proxy lines)
>
> I have mixed opinions on this. On the one hand, we can't really impose
> lower layers segmentation behaviour, so from a layering perspective, it
> is not correct. On the other hand, the use
On 08/06/12 23:15, Wietse Venema wrote:
You're incorrect. With PIPELINING turned on, the first reply after the
client DATA command is the server's response for the client MAIL FROM
command. client: MAIL FROM: client: RCPT TO:
client: DATA server: reply for MAIL FROM server: reply for RCPT TO
s
Achal tomar:
>
> Thanks for telling me about the RFC,but i want to know what configuration
> changes i have to do in postfix to achieve my goal.
As per the RFC, Postfix prepends Return-Path: only
when it performs final delivery.
Wietse
James:
> On 08/06/12 23:15, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > You're incorrect. With PIPELINING turned on, the first reply after the
> > client DATA command is the server's response for the client MAIL FROM
> > command. client: MAIL FROM: client: RCPT TO:
> > client: DATA server: reply for MAIL FROM serv
Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Achal tomar:
>>
>> Thanks for telling me about the RFC,but i want to know what configuration
>> changes i have to do in postfix to achieve my goal.
>
> As per the RFC, Postfix prepends Return-Path: only
> when it performs final delivery.
>
> Wietse
>
>
ok so
On 08/06/12 23:41, Wietse Venema wrote:
> This was discussed in my reply three weeks ago.
> [...]
> Maybe they installed a "security" "firewall" that mis-implements
> SMTP PIPELINING.
Yes I see now that this is the same issue.
To add some data points, for future googlers if nothing else.
In th
On 6/8/2012 7:47 AM, Achal tomar wrote:
> ok so how can i change he return path dynamically for each
> user when he/she sends a mail,so that he return path includes his/her
> user ID and also the to: header information,i want to do this in
> postfix and i am using centOS 5 as an OS.
This is calle
Achal tomar:
> Thanks for telling me about the RFC,but i want to know what configuration
> changes i have to do in postfix to achieve my goal.
Wietse Venema:
> As per the RFC, Postfix prepends Return-Path: only
> when it performs final delivery.
Achal tomar:
> ok so how can i change he return pa
Den 2012-06-07 12:56, Nicolae Ghimbovschi skrev:
Yeah, I see that. The file permissions are hardcoded.
That is why I tried to change Postfix's code.
where is the patch ?
mailq | grep mailaddr
postcat -q queueid | less
what more do you need ?
> where is the patch ?
The patch used on postfix 2.0.19 is very simple:
mail_stream.c
- || fchmod(vstream_fileno(info->stream), 0700 | info->mode)
+ || fchmod(vstream_fileno(info->stream), 0770 | info->mode)
> mailq | grep mailaddr
> postcat -q queueid | less
The message processing
Greetings,
In honor of IPv6 launch day I had figured I would get my mail server
IPv6-capable, but I've run into some trouble. I'm running Postfix 2.9.3
on a RHEL/CentOS 5-like Linux system but smtpd is only listening for
IPv4 connections. main.cf specifies listening everywhere:
> inet_interf
Den 2012-06-08 02:58, john skrev:
Are there any tools that would help in optimizing/tweaking the
Postfix configuration?
start with a empty main.cf is my best :=)
since this inhirit optimized defaults, while it keeps dynamic change in
the host autoupdate
in other words, just add lines to mai
Am 08.06.2012 16:49, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
> haveing mynetworks in main.cf is one of the worst if your network does not
> contain more then one wan ip
depends
we are using it on all machines running postfix to specify exactly
that LAN ip-addresses from server machines which are allowed to
re
Michael Tharp:
> Greetings,
>
> In honor of IPv6 launch day I had figured I would get my mail server
> IPv6-capable, but I've run into some trouble. I'm running Postfix 2.9.3
> on a RHEL/CentOS 5-like Linux system but smtpd is only listening for
> IPv4 connections. main.cf specifies listening e
On 06/08/2012 11:03 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> inet_interfaces = all
> inet_protocols = all
Please show "postconf -n" output instead of main.cf.
Good idea, this is from "postconf -n":
inet_interfaces = all
inet_protocols = ipv4
Curious. If I strace it it doesn't seem to make any soc
On 06/08/2012 11:45 AM, Victoriano Giralt wrote:
> El 08/06/12 17:40, Michael Tharp escribió:
>> Good idea, this is from "postconf -n":
>> inet_interfaces = all
>> inet_protocols = ipv4
> +^
> Does this tell you anything?
>
Well, I had initially assumed that postfix was se
Thank you for answer my question
Hotmail email server is just for example. Maybe so many email server that
not in the china have these problems.
The question is, in China, the government have special firewall “ great
firewall of china”, It make me can not reach the mail server who do not put
the
Den 2012-06-08 17:50, Michael Tharp skrev:
Sorry for the noise.
make it like sendmail.m4 ?,here m4 using postconf -e configline, it
works for sendmail, why not for postfix ?, good weekend
I am new to Postfix and I am having trouble getting a feature that I
have working on our existing Sendmail delivery system to function on
the new Postfix delivery system.
Basically, I want all incoming email that does not have a + extension
such as localu...@example.com to deliver to
/var/spool/im
Michael Tharp:
> inet_protocols = all
Wietse:
> > Please show "postconf -n" output instead of main.cf.
Michael Tharp:
> inet_protocols = ipv4
This is what Postfix uses.
To edit main.cf, use
postconf -e 'inet_protocols = all'
Wietse
Hi!
I'm trying to configure an additional subdomain for the domain I use for
e-mails, but I'm having some trouble with it, 99.9% due to DNS.
Each time I try to send an e-mail outside my network I get the following
error:
myaddr...@gmail.com: host devels.es[78.138.97.64] said: 550-Verificati
Nicolás schrieb:
myaddr...@gmail.com: host devels.es[78.138.97.64] said: 550-Verification
failed for 550-The mail server could not
deliver mail
to. The account or domain may not exist,
they may be
blacklisted, or missing the proper dns entries. 550 Sender verify
failed
Is there
Am 08.06.2012 20:19, schrieb Patrick Westenberg:
> Nicolás schrieb:
>
>> myaddr...@gmail.com: host devels.es[78.138.97.64] said: 550-Verification
>> failed for 550-The mail server could not
>> deliver mail
>> to. The account or domain may not exist,
>> they may be
>> blacklisted,
El 08/06/2012 19:22, Reindl Harald escribió:
Am 08.06.2012 20:19, schrieb Patrick Westenberg:
Nicolás schrieb:
myaddr...@gmail.com: host devels.es[78.138.97.64] said: 550-Verification
failed for 550-The mail server could not
deliver mail
to. The account or domain may not exist,
--On Friday, June 08, 2012 2:07 PM -0400 Wietse Venema
wrote:
Michael Tharp:
inet_protocols = all
Wietse:
> Please show "postconf -n" output instead of main.cf.
Michael Tharp:
inet_protocols = ipv4
This is what Postfix uses.
To edit main.cf, use
postconf -e 'inet_protocols = all'
Nicolás schrieb:
myaddr...@gmail.com: host devels.es[78.138.97.64] said: 550-Verification
...
subdomain.devels.es. IN MX 0 mail.devels.es
The response comes from devels.es with 78.138.97.64 but your MX-Records
points to mail.devels.es with 85.155.102.33.
Have you changed the records lately
El 08/06/2012 19:40, Patrick Westenberg escribió:
Nicolás schrieb:
myaddr...@gmail.com: host devels.es[78.138.97.64] said: 550-Verification
...
subdomain.devels.es. IN MX 0 mail.devels.es
The response comes from devels.es with 78.138.97.64 but your
MX-Records points to mail.devels.es with 8
This problem has nothing to do with Postfix. I apologize for taking
your time. Nonetheless I am posting the solution here in case someone
else runs into this.
As this is a new server host the appropriate access control list had not
been set on the direct delivery mailboxes for each user. For th
On 06/08/2012 04:08 PM, Nicolae Ghimbovschi wrote:
where is the patch ?
The patch used on postfix 2.0.19 is very simple:
mail_stream.c
- || fchmod(vstream_fileno(info->stream), 0700 | info->mode)
+ || fchmod(vstream_fileno(info->stream), 0770 | info->mode)
mailq | grep mailaddr
po
On 06/06/2012 01:16 PM, Toni Mueller wrote:
Hi,
I recently upgraded a machine from Postfix 2.8 to 2.9. The machine uses,
amongst other things, a custom transport to facilitate masking outgoing
email addresses and sending with SMTP-AUTH.
In main.cf, this looks like follows:
mtp_sasl_auth_enable
42 matches
Mail list logo
