Hi,
i'm using a Newsreader to read this list (via news.gname.org). But afaik
i have to be subscribed to write to this list. And if i'm subscribed i
will receive every post via email too, so i receive it twice.
Is there a way to be subscribed without "receving" posts to my mail address?
kind regar
Dear
I have played with DNS and MX but the problem is DNS did not care about
servers load and if servers have a huge queue.
It just balance to next MX only if the server did not respond.
Load-balancing is a cool feature that take care on the server health.
Especially if you add services on the
On May 28, 2012, at 10:26, David Touzeau wrote:
> I have played with DNS and MX but the problem is DNS did not care about
> servers load and if servers have a huge queue.
> It just balance to next MX only if the server did not respond.
> Load-balancing is a cool feature that take care on the ser
Hi all
I am using postfix 2.8.4 on centos 5.8 and recently I installed bind9 on the
same server to have my own DNS server. I didn't change MX record of mail
server as I am still testing configuration and newbie but I noticed that
outgoing mails stopped being delivered and I don't know why as I do
Am 28.05.2012 13:57, schrieb Amira Othman:
> I am using postfix 2.8.4 on centos 5.8 and recently I installed bind9 on the
> same server to have my own DNS server. I didn't change MX record of mail
> server as I am still testing configuration and newbie but I noticed that
> outgoing mails stopped
Amira Othman:
> Hi all
>
> I am using postfix 2.8.4 on centos 5.8 and recently I installed bind9 on the
> same server to have my own DNS server. I didn't change MX record of mail
> server as I am still testing configuration and newbie but I noticed that
> outgoing mails stopped being delivered and
Amira Othman:
> Hi all
>
> I am using postfix 2.8.4 on centos 5.8 and recently I installed bind9 on
the
> same server to have my own DNS server. I didn't change MX record of mail
> server as I am still testing configuration and newbie but I noticed that
> outgoing mails stopped being delivered and
Am 28.05.2012 14:22, schrieb Amira Othman:
> from=, size=11908, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
> May 28 10:20:28 cairosource postfix/smtp[32092]: AC8596E684AB:
> to=, relay=mx01.hmc1.comcast.net[76.96.53.13]:25,
> delay=2.1, delays=1.9/0.02/0.24/0, dsn=4.0.0, status=deferred (host
> mx01.hmc1.comcast.ne
Amira Othman:
> Comcast requires that all mail servers must have a PTR record with
> a valid Reverse DNS entry. Currently your mail server does not
> fill that requirement. For more information, refer to:
> http://worknetkc.st.comcastsupport.com/sdccommon/asp/defcontent_view.asp?
> ssfromlink=true
Thanks for the response Wietse, most appreciated.
Daniel Sutcliffe wrote:
>> I'm having a very similar problem here on CentOS 6 - unfortunately moving or
>> removing the TLS session caches and restarting postfix is not fixing my
>> problem
>> at all. Coincidently the openssl package was updated
Daniel Sutcliffe:
> I have now tried stopping postfix, downgrading my openssl package back
> to this previous version, deleting the TLS session caches, and
> starting postfix again and the same problem is occurring - which would
> infer to me that it isn't an OpenSSL package version which caused th
Hello,
I've got a mail server (A) configured to always_bcc to another computer (B).
Fine.
My problem is the following. Let's say the original email had 10 recipients.
When "A" hands the email to "B" it preserves the MAIL FROM part, however
it drops all the 10 recipients in the RCPT TO phase and
Kov?cs Albert:
> Hello,
>
>I've got a mail server (A) configured to always_bcc to another
>computer (B). Fine.
>
>My problem is the following. Let's say the original email had 10
>recipients. When "A" hands the email to "B" it preserves the MAIL
>FROM part, however it drops all the 10 recipients i
many years ago when I switched to postfix, I had a problem with some
large, nested aliases in the aliases file - an invalid recipient
somewhere in the list would cause a send failure and so the message to
the alias would be requeued with the result being that those recipients
before the problem wo
On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 17:52:24 -0700, Dirk Kleinhesselink wrote:
> ...
> Then in virtual, I put;
>
> all-groups:group_1, group_2, group_3
> ...
> I'm now moving my mail server within the organization to a new
> subdomain, but I intend to keep the same mail address scheme we've
> always used.
On 5/28/2012 8:08 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 17:52:24 -0700, Dirk Kleinhesselink wrote:
>
>> ...
>> Then in virtual, I put;
>>
>> all-groups:group_1, group_2, group_3
I see two possible problems...
First, with virtual_alias_maps it is strongly recommended to use
fully-q
16 matches
Mail list logo
