Postfix 2.9.2, 2.8.11, 2.7.10, 2.6.16 available

2012-05-21 Thread Wietse Venema
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.9.3.html] Postfix stable release 2.9.3, and legacy releases 2.8.11, 2.7.10, 2.6.16 are available. They contains workarounds that are already part of Postfix 2.10. * OpenSSL related (all

Re: Missing attachments - BAD HEADER SECTION, MIME error: error: part did not end with expected boundary

2012-05-21 Thread mouss
Le 16/05/2012 15:35, Alex Dyas a écrit : > Hello, > > Thanks for your reply. My initial theory was that the attachment was > being stripped out of the message before it got to Amavis, well, that's probable, but where was it stripped out? most probably at the client side, by Exchange or Zimbra or

canonical-sender and auto-bcc

2012-05-21 Thread Christian Meier
Hi, in e-mails with a particular FROM header should the FROM header be rewritten *and* the e-mail should be sent by blind carbon copy to a predefined address. In theory, it is possible to use the canonical-sender and sender_bcc_maps functions. In practice, the address on the right of the canoni

LMTP for smtpd_proxy_filter

2012-05-21 Thread Patrick Westenberg
Hello, I'd like to know if there are any plans to enable LMTP with the smtpd_proxy_filter? Regards Patrick

Re: canonical-sender and auto-bcc

2012-05-21 Thread Wietse Venema
Christian Meier: > Hi, > > in e-mails with a particular FROM header should the FROM header > be rewritten *and* the e-mail should be sent by blind carbon copy > to a predefined address. > > In theory, it is possible to use the canonical-sender and > sender_bcc_maps functions. In practice, the addr

Re: LMTP for smtpd_proxy_filter

2012-05-21 Thread Wietse Venema
Patrick Westenberg: > Hello, > > I'd like to know if there are any plans to enable LMTP with the > smtpd_proxy_filter? An SMTP-to-LMTP adapter is fundamentally not possible. With N recipients, LMTP gives N end-of-data replies (*), while SMTP gives one. (*) For example, the LMTP server has deliv

Re: LMTP for smtpd_proxy_filter

2012-05-21 Thread Wietse Venema
Wietse Venema: > Patrick Westenberg: > > Hello, > > > > I'd like to know if there are any plans to enable LMTP with the > > smtpd_proxy_filter? > > An SMTP-to-LMTP adapter is fundamentally not possible. With N > recipients, LMTP gives N end-of-data replies (*), while SMTP gives > one. > > (*) F

Re: Postfix 2.9.2, 2.8.11, 2.7.10, 2.6.16 available

2012-05-21 Thread ml
Le lundi 21 mai 2012 à 08:55 -0400, Wietse Venema a écrit : > [An on-line version of this announcement will be available at > http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.9.3.html] > > Postfix stable release 2.9.3, and legacy releases 2.8.11, 2.7.10, > 2.6.16 are available. They contains workaro

Re: Postfix 2.9.2, 2.8.11, 2.7.10, 2.6.16 available

2012-05-21 Thread Wietse Venema
ml: > after having realized a full build of postfix. > I noticed a small difference between the patch > > ftp://ftp.its.cz/MIRRORS/ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/feature-patches/20120407-nobreak-reply-footer-patch > > that made me start the arguments of the option smtpd_

Multi Instance smtpd not listening

2012-05-21 Thread Asa Gage
I have configured a second instance of postfix 2.6.6(RHEL6) with postmulti and provided a unique $myhostname for the second instance. I have also provided a different IP address for inet_interfaces for the second instance and restarted the postfix service. I see both pids running, but the second i

Re: Multi Instance smtpd not listening

2012-05-21 Thread Wietse Venema
Asa Gage: > I have configured a second instance of postfix 2.6.6(RHEL6) with > postmulti and provided a unique $myhostname for the second instance. I > have also provided a different IP address for inet_interfaces for the > second instance and restarted the postfix service. > > I see both pids run

Re: Multi Instance smtpd not listening

2012-05-21 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 08:40:21PM -0400, Asa Gage wrote: > I have configured a second instance of postfix 2.6.6(RHEL6) with > postmulti and provided a unique $myhostname for the second instance. I > have also provided a different IP address for inet_interfaces for the > second instance and restar

Feature Request - address process testing

2012-05-21 Thread Daniel L. Miller
I would find it quite useful to have a command, whereby either a designated sender or recipient address can be tested against the complete Postfix configuration, and have both the process and the result displayed. For example: postcanonical [-r | -s] tar...@domain.com using recipient_canonica