On 5/6/2012 1:16 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 19:49:18 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> If this discrepancy is reproducible let me know. Otherwise I
>> will not lose sleep over this.
>
> Fair enough; I will not report back unless I am able to reproduce it.
Hi Sahil,
Have you c
Is there anything I should/could do to prevent these type of
occurrences? My understanding is that postscreen(8) temporarily
struggles to contact dnsblog(8) and in the meantime,
postscreen_greet_wait elapses before DNSBL lookup results are available
for this client.
May 5 10:00:26 mx1 postfix/p
On May 6, 2012, at 09:39, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> Is there anything I should/could do to prevent these type of
> occurrences? My understanding is that postscreen(8) temporarily
> struggles to contact dnsblog(8) and in the meantime,
> postscreen_greet_wait elapses before DNSBL lookup results are ava
Hi,
I have two scenarii where I would like to know how an e-mail address
delivers. One of those scenarii is:
I extract e-mail address from various databases for the various
services of our system (ranging from the USENET news server to
fax to e-mail gateway) then create a (Mailman) mailing-list w
Sahil Tandon:
> May 5 10:00:26 mx1 postfix/postscreen[38500]: warning: psc_dnsbl_request:
> connect to private/dnsblog service: Connection refused
> May 5 10:00:26 mx1 last message repeated 8 times
When does FreeBSD report ECONNREFUSED on an open socket? I thought
it would do that only when t
Sahil Tandon:
> On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 19:49:18 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Sahil Tandon:
> > > May 5 15:24:07 mx1 postfix/postscreen[38500]: CONNECT from
> > > [88.23.204.109]:40294 to [69.147.83.52]:25
> > > May 5 15:24:07 mx1 postfix/dnsblog[45237]: addr 88.23.204.109 listed by
> > >
On Sun, 6 May 2012 03:39:19 -0400
Sahil Tandon articulated:
>I could not find references to this issue in the archives, and I know
>others manage much higher-volume sites, so I suspect it just indicates
>a severely borked system (FreeBSD 8.3) on my side.
Ever since updating to FreeBSD-8.3 STABLE,
* DTNX Postmaster :
> On May 4, 2012, at 13:12, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
> > http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL138067
> >
> > The evidence section lists "inetnum: 95.218.0.0 - 95.219.255.255", yet
> > spamhaus listed 93.218.0.0/15 (93 instead of 95)!
> >
> > 93.218.0.0/15 includes large part
On May 3, 2012, at 7:23 PM, Steve wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Below the untested code but I think it should work:
>>> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>>> if /^X\-DSPAM\-Confidence\:\s+/
>>> /^X\-DSPAM\-Confidence\:\s+(0\.[7-9]\d+)$/ DISCARD DSPAM confidence
>> ${1} greater than 0.700
>>> endif
>>> =-
Alfonso Reyes:
> Hi everyone.
>
> I'm trying yo set up postfix with dovecot imap, everything works fine.
Questions about Dovecot configuration are better asked on the
Dovecot mailing list.
Wietse
thanks and Im sorry But Im not sure if it's a dovecot issue or postfix
issue.
Thats why I sent that email.
Regards.
Ing. Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jimenez
On May 6, 2012 4:32 PM, "Wietse Venema" wrote:
> Alfonso Reyes:
> > Hi everyone.
> >
> > I'm trying yo set up postfix with dovecot imap, e
it can not be a postfix problem because
postfix is only a MTA and has nothing to
do with IMAP or POP3 in any form
Am 06.05.2012 23:34, schrieb Alfonso Reyes:
> thanks and Im sorry But Im not sure if it's a dovecot issue or postfix
> issue.
>
> Thats why I sent that email.
>
> Regards.
>
> I
But it handles the mail boxes and deliver to them, thats why I was
confused. As far as I know dovecot only read the information con them.
But it's ok I will contact the dovecot mailing list, sorry for the email.
Ing. Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jimenez
On May 6, 2012 5:19 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrot
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 6 May 2012 16:22:48 -0500
> Von: Chad M Stewart
> An: Steve
> CC: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Betreff: Re: a header check rule to do <= or >=
>
> On May 3, 2012, at 7:23 PM, Steve wrote:
>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Below the untested code but I thin
Le 06/05/2012 13:58, Marc SCHAEFER a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I have two scenarii where I would like to know how an e-mail address
> delivers. One of those scenarii is:
>
> I extract e-mail address from various databases for the various
> services of our system (ranging from the USENET news server to
>
This is now updated.
Wietse
Other measures to off-load zombies
The postscreen(8) daemon, introduced with Postfix 2.8, provides
additional protection against mail server overload. One postscreen(8)
process handles all connections from "new" SMTP clients, and allows
only well-behaved clien
How do I get TLS SNI support in Postfix? I can't find any documentation on the
subject except a few discussions that are several years old. I've got TLS
working with one domain but I want to expand it to an unknown number of domains
and I don't care if the mail client lacks support for SNI.
On 07/05/12 14:21, Fiona Hines wrote:
> How do I get TLS SNI support in Postfix? I can't find any documentation
> on the subject except a few discussions that are several years old.
> I've got TLS working with one domain but I want to expand it to an
> unknown number of domains and I don't care i
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:26:27AM CEST, Alfonso Reyes said:
> But it handles the mail boxes and deliver to them, thats why I was confused.
> As
> far as I know dovecot only read the information con them.
>
> But it's ok I will contact the dovecot mailing list, sorry for the email.
It depend
That won't work for me. SNI support is the only solution for my scenario
sinceI can't use just one SSL certificate. I haven't used Google Apps to know
what you are talking about.
And I've got a feeling that the "250 response" part of your reply is just wrong
- which 250 response? Certificate
20 matches
Mail list logo
