On Apr 14, 2012, at 15.55, Wietse Venema wrote:
> The alternatives that I see are
>
> a) Spam every address class description with text that virtual alias
> mappings are class-agnostic. Then we would also have to mention
> canonical_maps,and other class-agnostic mechanisms.
on one hand, this mi
b...@bitrate.net:
> > b) Describe the virtual alias lookup behavior in the text that
> > defines virtual alias lookups, i.e. virtual(5). If anyone uses
> > virtual aliasing then they are more likely to look there.
>
> i'm not certain the placement is ideal, but a note at the end of the VIRTUAL
>
Den 2012-04-09 02:15, Daniel L. Miller skrev:
Apr 8 17:02:35 bubba assp/smtpd[7414]: warning:
unknown[110.53.26.206]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed:
UGFzc3dvcmQ6
This is much better. My remaining question is - is there a way I can
get even that first connection line to reference the remot
Den 2012-04-16 05:21, Benny Pedersen skrev:
my own defence on this is to
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_discard_ehlo_keywords
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords ups
Den 2012-04-08 03:23, Jon Miller skrev:
MAIL LOG
Apr 8 08:09:18 mmtlnx postfix/qmgr[23096]: EBE1D18AF6:
from=, size=8778, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Apr 8 08:09:18 mmtlnx postfix/smtp[23162]: EBE1D18AF6:
to=, relay=none, delay=1, status=bounced
(localhost: No address associated with hostname)
127
Le 13/04/2012 19:27, Kizito Thomas a écrit :
> Thank you Ansgar,
> Does it mean I cannot use this method to block un desirable mails this way?
> At first I tried using the method explained on
> http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/howto-blacklist-reject-sender-email-address/ but
> this could not allow post
Good morning,
A bit of an extreme example, but i've often wondered, when looking
through my Postfix logs, why some senders do this:
Received: from mx-out.facebook.com (outmail019.snc7.facebook.com
[69.171.232.153]) by .
The connecting host has HELO'd as 'mx-out.facebook.com'
If it is traced
