b...@bitrate.net:
> i see your point. would this be less confusing?
>
> --- ADDRESS_CLASS_README 2007-03-25 10:53:46.0 -0400
> +++ ADDRESS_CLASS_README.mod 2012-04-10 22:04:19.0 -0400
> @@ -83,6 +83,10 @@
>* There is no mail delivery transport parameter. Every address mu
Viktor Dukhovni:
> I always thought that a final LMTP server only responds 2XX to an
> MTA when the message is safely in the mailbox, [...]
I looked up some Sieve RFCs and found that the language implements
accept-then-bounce behavior:
- "reject" (RFC 3028) implements accept-then-bounce. It repli
Hello list,
I do not know where else to file a feature request so I hope this is the
right place.
My request is for a command line option to the sendmail command to allow
outputting the contents of the delivery report generated by the -bv command
directly to the standard output of the calling cons
Alan B:
> Hello list,
> I do not know where else to file a feature request so I hope this is the
> right place.
>
> My request is for a command line option to the sendmail command to allow
> outputting the contents of the delivery report generated by the -bv command
> directly to the standard outp
I missed one word.
Wietse
Alan B:
> Hello list,
> I do not know where else to file a feature request so I hope this is the
> right place.
>
> My request is for a command line option to the sendmail command to allow
> outputting the contents of the delivery report generated by the -bv com
