Hi list,
I have configured an alternate transport route for mail going to
specific destination domains. I call this transport "slowsmtp".
My problem is that I see no evidence in my logs that email sent to the
specific domains uses "slowsmtp" route for delivery.
I have defined "slowsmtp" in "/etc
Den 2012-04-01 21:20, ml skrev:
!DSPAM:4f788f81117124017984636!
I just made the changes I think the problem is solved
check that !DSPAM is not in public maillists
if it is then problem resists
dspam_stats -H
list postfix-users@postfix.org
:)
On 02/04/2012 14:31, Mikael Bak wrote:
Hi list,
I have configured an alternate transport route for mail going to
specific destination domains. I call this transport "slowsmtp".
My problem is that I see no evidence in my logs that email sent to the
specific domains uses "slowsmtp" route for deli
Good afternoon,
I use SPf for spf authorized domains. When my primary MX fails,
email is sent to my backup MX. When my primary get up, email that
waits in the spool of my backup is rejected by my primary server
because of SPF. For example
http://www.openspf.org/Why?id=aukro%40info.aukr
Hi,
In our setup we have mail firewall which receives all the emails from
Internet. We have 4 MX's and we have pointed all the MX IP's on firewall
with equal preference.
We then NAT packets from mail firewall to Ironport which handles Spam
Filtering and delivers mails to mail cluster for delivery
Am 02.04.2012 14:52, schrieb Josef Karliak:
> Good afternoon,
> I use SPf for spf authorized domains. When my primary MX fails, email is
> sent to my backup MX. When my primary
> get up, email that waits in the spool of my backup is rejected by my primary
> server because of SPF. For exampl
Szia Levente!
On 04/02/2012 02:26 PM, Birta Levente wrote:
> On 02/04/2012 14:31, Mikael Bak wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I have configured an alternate transport route for mail going to
>> specific destination domains. I call this transport "slowsmtp".
>>
>> My problem is that I see no evidence in my
On 4/2/2012 7:53 AM, niket joshi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In our setup we have mail firewall which receives all the emails
> from Internet. We have 4 MX's and we have pointed all the MX IP's on
> firewall with equal preference.
>
> We then NAT packets from mail firewall to Ironport which handles
> Spam
> you could always just not install postfix, since installing
> an entire mail server isn't at all necessary to simply send
> email. i would recommend null client specific software, such
> as msmtp, instead. among other things, it would likely
> introduce far fewer packaging considerations.
>
Hello
I am relatively new to postfix (great product by the way) & am
struggling with two issues.
1. Specifying a different Reply To
2. Bouncing a message back to external incoming mail
I have setup postfix as a relay for our systems to send messages
though which then get passed on to a central e
Steve Ellis:
[ Charset windows-1252 unsupported, converting... ]
> Hello
>
> I am relatively new to postfix (great product by the way) & am
> struggling with two issues.
>
> 1. Specifying a different Reply To
> 2. Bouncing a message back to external incoming mail
>
> I have setup postfix as a re
On 4/2/2012 1:51 AM, Jeremie CEINTREY wrote:
> Thank you very much for your explanations.
>
> I'm going to test with smtpd_client_connection_count_limit = 1
>
> Three days ago I added smtpd_client_connection_rate_limit = 10, wich limit
> the number of connection by a client to 10 by time unit;
On Apr 1, 2012, at 9:26 PM, jeffrey j donovan wrote:
> greetings
>
> im setting up an authenticated relay for some users. using SASL/TLSv1 dovecot
> auth, pam.
> for local users things work fine. but im getting myself confused on how to
> incorporate ldap users hosted on a remote system. i und
Dear All,
I have a installation of Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. Here I have
installed postfix/dovecot . Last week I have installed
Amavis/ClamAV/spamassassin to filter spam emails. All is working fine. The
only problem is that I want to forward all the spam/virus email to one email
account
14 matches
Mail list logo
