Re: Continued support for postcat/postqueue?

2012-03-27 Thread Wietse Venema
Unless stated otherwise all Postfix features are supported. It takes years before a feature goes from "deprecated" to "no longer documented" and it takes even longer before a feature is removed (if ever). Wietse

Re: On proxy_read_maps

2012-03-27 Thread Nikolaos Milas
On 9/3/2012 2:09 μμ, Reindl Harald wrote: his "postconf -n" does not contain "proxy_read_maps" if you think it is not needed at all than postfix has a bug i did the follwoing long a go because exavtly the same messages in the error log after start using "proxy:mysql" and because "proxymap servi

Re: On proxy_read_maps

2012-03-27 Thread Wietse Venema
Nikolaos Milas: > On 9/3/2012 2:09 ??, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > his "postconf -n" does not contain "proxy_read_maps" > > if you think it is not needed at all than postfix has a bug > > > > i did the follwoing long a go because exavtly the same messages > > in the error log after start using "pro

Re: On proxy_read_maps

2012-03-27 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 27.03.2012 14:35, schrieb Wietse Venema: > Nikolaos Milas: >> On 9/3/2012 2:09 ??, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >>> his "postconf -n" does not contain "proxy_read_maps" >>> if you think it is not needed at all than postfix has a bug >>> >>> i did the follwoing long a go because exavtly the same mes

Re: On proxy_read_maps

2012-03-27 Thread Wietse Venema
Reindl Harald: > > As of Postfix 2.9, the default proxy_read/write_maps settings are: > > > > % bin/postconf -df proxy_read_maps proxy_write_maps > > proxy_read_maps = $local_recipient_maps $mydestination $virtual_alias_maps > > $virtual_alias_domains $virtual_mailbox_maps $virtual_mailbox_dom

Add message-id if it is missing

2012-03-27 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
Hi List! Simple question: is there an easy way to add a message-id to every incoming message that is missing it? I've digged the documentation and the closest thing i found was the always_add_missing_headers parameters. But i don't want to add any other fields besides a message-id. I understand th

Re: On proxy_read_maps

2012-03-27 Thread Nikolaos Milas
On 27/3/2012 3:35 μμ, Wietse Venema wrote: As of Postfix 2.9, the default proxy_read/write_maps settings are: Thanks Wietse, I tested on 2.9.1 with proxy:ldap: in virtual_alias_maps and virtual_mailbox_maps and it worked fine (without changing the default proxy_read_maps). I remind you th

Re: Add message-id if it is missing

2012-03-27 Thread Wietse Venema
Michael Weissenbacher: > I understand that every message should include the message-id Header, RFC 5322 (the current spec for Internet messages) says SHOULD, not MUST. Mail software must therefore not depend on the existence of this header. Wietse

Re: Add message-id if it is missing

2012-03-27 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
Wietse Venema: > Michael Weissenbacher: >> I understand that every message should include the message-id Header, > > RFC 5322 (the current spec for Internet messages) says SHOULD, not > MUST. Mail software must therefore not depend on the existence of > this header. > Thanks for that clarificati

Re: Add message-id if it is missing

2012-03-27 Thread Wietse Venema
Michael Weissenbacher: > Wietse Venema: > > Michael Weissenbacher: > >> I understand that every message should include the message-id Header, > > > > RFC 5322 (the current spec for Internet messages) says SHOULD, not > > MUST. Mail software must therefore not depend on the existence of > > this h

Re: SMTP Authentication

2012-03-27 Thread Joe Wong
Sent from my iPad On 26 Mar, 2012, at 4:29, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > * KingT : >> I have just read SMTP Authentication and known have much type of it. Such as >> mail Submission, Extended SMTP, SASL. >> >> And I want to setup an SMTP AUTH on my mail server. Which type I should >> choose

Re: Add message-id if it is missing

2012-03-27 Thread Michael Weissenbacher
schrieb Wietse Venema: > Michael Weissenbacher: >> Wietse Venema: >>> Michael Weissenbacher: I understand that every message should include the message-id Header, >>> >>> RFC 5322 (the current spec for Internet messages) says SHOULD, not >>> MUST. Mail software must therefore not depend on th

Re: Building basic relay server

2012-03-27 Thread Alex
Hi, >>> i would go to smtp:[smtp.dom1.example.com]25 >>> in order to avoid mx record lookup for the domain. >>> adn the local: is not really needed. >>> just list the remote domains. >>> i would see some benefit with a main relay server that can be a redundant >>> point for the domain queue. >> >>

Re: On proxy_read_maps

2012-03-27 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 27.03.2012 15:28, schrieb Wietse Venema: > Reindl Harald: >>> As of Postfix 2.9, the default proxy_read/write_maps settings are: >>> >>> % bin/postconf -df proxy_read_maps proxy_write_maps >>> proxy_read_maps = $local_recipient_maps $mydestination $virtual_alias_maps >>> $virtual_alias_dom

Postfix as smarthost for local netwok

2012-03-27 Thread Pierre-Gilles RAYNAUD
Hi Everyone, We have a simple architecture - serv001 is running Postfix 2.7 (Debian Squeeze) as a domain mail server (in and out) - serv002 is running websites and want to use serv001 as relay for sending emails. The issue we are facing is that emails sent from serv002 are rejected by Postfix

Re: Postfix as smarthost for local netwok

2012-03-27 Thread Peter
On 28/03/12 07:59, Pierre-Gilles RAYNAUD wrote: > 450 4.1.8 : Sender address rejected: Domain not > found; > > smtpd_sender_restrictions = check_sender_access > hash:/etc/postfix/sender-checks, reject_unknown_sender_domain, > reject_non_fqdn_sender, Your emails are getting rejected by th

mangled $myhostname

2012-03-27 Thread brian
2.8.5-2~build1 (Ubuntu) Does anyone have an idea what might be going on with $myhostname here? $ postconf -h myhostname demeter.DOMAIN.org Mar 26 23:36:03 demeter postfix/smtpd[15657]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from bas10-montrealak-1128580898.dsl.bell.ca[67.68.199.34]: 504 5.5.2 : Helo command r

Re: mangled $myhostname

2012-03-27 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* brian : > 2.8.5-2~build1 (Ubuntu) > > Does anyone have an idea what might be going on with $myhostname here? > > $ postconf -h myhostname > demeter.DOMAIN.org > > Mar 26 23:36:03 demeter postfix/smtpd[15657]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT > from bas10-montrealak-1128580898.dsl.bell.ca[67.68.199.34]: 5

Re: mangled $myhostname

2012-03-27 Thread brian
On 12-03-27 03:30 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: * brian: 2.8.5-2~build1 (Ubuntu) Does anyone have an idea what might be going on with $myhostname here? $ postconf -h myhostname demeter.DOMAIN.org Mar 26 23:36:03 demeter postfix/smtpd[15657]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from bas10-montrealak-112858089

defer mail for unknown recipients for one domain only

2012-03-27 Thread Sebastian Wiesinger
Hello, I have a setup with handles a few virtual domains. For one domain only I want mails not to be rejected with an 5xx error code but be deferred with a 4xx error code. Is that possible? Regards Sebastian -- GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A 9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE) 'Are you D

Re: mangled $myhostname

2012-03-27 Thread /dev/rob0
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 03:43:08PM -0400, brian wrote: > On 12-03-27 03:30 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > >* brian: > >>2.8.5-2~build1 (Ubuntu) > >> > >>Does anyone have an idea what might be going on with $myhostname > >>here? > >> > >>$ postconf -h myhostname > >>demeter.DOMAIN.org > >> > >>Mar 2

Re: mangled $myhostname

2012-03-27 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 3/27/2012 2:43 PM, brian wrote: > On 12-03-27 03:30 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: >> * brian: >>> 2.8.5-2~build1 (Ubuntu) >>> >>> Does anyone have an idea what might be going on with $myhostname here? >>> >>> $ postconf -h myhostname >>> demeter.DOMAIN.org >>> >>> Mar 26 23:36:03 demeter postfix/s

Re: defer mail for unknown recipients for one domain only

2012-03-27 Thread /dev/rob0
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:21:14PM +0200, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote: > I have a setup with handles a few virtual domains. For one domain > only I want mails not to be rejected with an 5xx error code but be > deferred with a 4xx error code. Is that possible? main.cf : smtpd_client_restrictions =

Re: defer mail for unknown recipients for one domain only

2012-03-27 Thread /dev/rob0
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 04:10:59PM -0500, I wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:21:14PM +0200, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote: > > I have a setup with handles a few virtual domains. For one domain > > only I want mails not to be rejected with an 5xx error code but be > > deferred with a 4xx error code

Re: defer mail for unknown recipients for one domain only

2012-03-27 Thread Wietse Venema
/dev/rob0: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 04:10:59PM -0500, I wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:21:14PM +0200, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote: > > > I have a setup with handles a few virtual domains. For one domain > > > only I want mails not to be rejected with an 5xx error code but be > > > deferred

Re: defer mail for unknown recipients for one domain only

2012-03-27 Thread Wietse Venema
Wietse Venema: > /dev/rob0: > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 04:10:59PM -0500, I wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:21:14PM +0200, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote: > > > > I have a setup with handles a few virtual domains. For one domain > > > > only I want mails not to be rejected with an 5xx error cod

Re: defer mail for unknown recipients for one domain only

2012-03-27 Thread /dev/rob0
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:43:27PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Wietse Venema: > > /dev/rob0: > > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 04:10:59PM -0500, I wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:21:14PM +0200, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote: > > > > > I have a setup with handles a few virtual domains. For one d