Am 08.02.2012 07:06, schrieb N. Yaakov Ziskind:
> DN Singh wrote (on Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:50:50AM +0530):
>> The setting can be changed in the parameter "smtpd_sender_restrictions"
>> reject_unknown_sender_domain, if it is necessary.
>
> That would let in *all* mail from nonexistent domains,
I read the details of the multiple instance support but it's not clear
to me how I can use it to achieve my goal. Do anyone have similar
setup and share your configuration here?
Many Thanks,
- Joe
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Joe Wong wrote:
> Thanks Reindl.
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:3
Hello list,
my apologies in advance for the almost OT question.
I need to setup a mail server that does a particular thing: it receives mail
(from user SMTP submission, not as final destination) and, instead of relay,
"does something" that ends up in having the mail (body + headers + attachments
Hi all,
Thanks for the help. I've discovered that I was missing some details
in SELinux (Using CentOS6)
[code]
wget linuxmail.info/files/rhel6/postfixdovecotsasl.te
checkmodule -M -m -o postfixdovecotsasl.mod postfixdovecotsasl.te
semodule_package -o postfixdovecotsasl.pp -m postfixdovecotsasl.mo
On 08/02/2012 10:19, Fabio Sangiovanni wrote:
> it receives mail (from user SMTP submission, not as final destination) and,
> instead of relay, "does something" that ends up in having the mail (body +
> headers + attachments) in a mysql table
You can write a custom 'deliver' that copies your ema
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:06:44AM -0500, N. Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
> DN Singh wrote (on Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:50:50AM +0530):
> > The setting can be changed in the parameter
> > "smtpd_sender_restrictions" reject_unknown_sender_domain,
> > if it is necessary.
>
> That would let in *all* mail fr
Hallo,
So far I have not implemented SMTP Auth for various reasons (on of them was the
fact that I had no Postfix installed). Anyway, I would like to implement it,
but since I have a relatively large base (>200K emails), I would like to do it
in a non-disruptive way. I was thinking to implement
Am 08.02.2012 14:57, schrieb Peter Tselios:
> Hallo,
>
> So far I have not implemented SMTP Auth for various reasons (on of them was
> the fact that I had no Postfix installed). Anyway, I would like to implement
> it, but since I have a relatively large base (>200K emails), I would like to
>
Hi, thank you for your reply.
The point here is that I don't want to store messages that I receive as final
destination, but those that, in a "normal" situation, I would act as a relay
for. My scenario is the following:
internet -> mta for user submission (smtp) -> sql backend
The mta isn't con
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Peter Tselios wrote:
So far I have not implemented SMTP Auth for various reasons (on of them
was the fact that I had no Postfix installed). Anyway, I would like to
implement it, but since I have a relatively large base (>200K emails), I
would like to do it in a non-disrupti
Wondering if anyone has made this leap recently, and what changes/gotchas
might be pertinent?
Am 08.02.2012 16:20, schrieb l...@airstreamcomm.net:
> Wondering if anyone has made this leap recently, and what changes/gotchas
> might be pertinent?
clone your configuration in a virtual machine and try it
SIX major releases is a lot, even having the fact
that Wietse is very careful with chan
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:25:04PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> SIX major releases is a lot, even having the fact
> that Wietse is very careful with changes in mind
>
> the problem is that even he can not say what exactly
> has changed since long not supported releases and
> how will this possib
On 08/02/2012 15:16, Fabio Sangiovanni wrote:
> but those that, in a "normal" situation, I would act as a relay for.
You can redirect them to 'your daemon' with 'relayhost' or with a specific
transport map.
--
Simone Caruso
IT Consultant
+39 349 65 90 805
Am 08.02.2012 16:32, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:25:04PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> SIX major releases is a lot, even having the fact
>> that Wietse is very careful with changes in mind
>>
>> the problem is that even he can not say what exactly
>> has changed sinc
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 15:32:55 +, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:25:04PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> SIX major releases is a lot, even having the fact
>> that Wietse is very careful with changes in mind
>>
>> the problem is that even he can not say what exactly
>> has
Thanks a ton for the reply.
I have compared the working version(2.4.6) box vs this one 2.8.7 here are the
results.
1. postfix-script files exist at same locations.
[root@box-1 /]# find / -name postfix-script
/etc/postfix.one/postfix-script
/etc/postfix.two/postfix-script
[root@box-2 /]# find
The closest jump we are trying to now is from 2.4 to 2.8, but still in
installation phase. :)
- Original Message -
From: "l...@airstreamcomm.net"
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: Upgrade from 2.3.3 to 2.9
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 15:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 08:47:27AM -0800, Mr fix wrote:
> I have compared the working version(2.4.6) box vs this one 2.8.7
> here are the results.
>
> 1. postfix-script files exist at same locations.
>
> [root@box-1 /]# find / -name postfix-script
> /etc/postfix.one/postfix-script
> /etc/postfix
On 07.02.2012 13:57, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
I wonder if there is an easy solution to disallow a specific sender
(From-Header) to send e-mails to non $mydestination addresses.
Check smtpd_sender_restrictions and/or smtpd_client_restrictions, as
well as restriction classes:
http://www.postfix.or
Just tried that brute force and worked.your reference validates the issue.
These things generally happen when we jump 4 versions in one shot, thank you
very much for pitching in.
We have multiple instances running so as per older way they distributed
postfix-files, -script -install in diffe
As vikor dukhovni mentioned in other thread, here is one thing you can keep in
mind.
The postfix-script, postfix-files and related
files are as of Postfix 2.6 expected to be in /usr/libexec/postfix
(really $daemon_directory).
Thanks,
Kumar
- Original Message -
From: "l...@airstreamcom
Mr fix:
> > Thanks a ton for the reply.
>
> I have compared the working version(2.4.6) box vs this one 2.8.7
> here are the results.
>
> 1. postfix-script files exist at same locations.
>
> [root@box-1 /]# find / -name postfix-script
> /etc/postfix.one/postfix-script
> /etc/postfix.two/postfix-sc
Hello.
I'm configuring my own domain with Postfix, I have set up as this:
user1 - personal mail ( 3 email addresses via aliases )
user2 - mail lists
user3 - spam catch for spamassassin learn purposes
user4 - a copy of user1 in /etc/postfix/aliases , so all mail received in user1
periodicall
On 2/8/2012 12:07 PM, Mr fix wrote:
> Just tried that brute force and worked.your reference validates the issue.
>
> These things generally happen when we jump 4 versions in one shot, thank you
> very much for pitching in.
>
> We have multiple instances running so as per older way they distrib
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 06:06:24PM +0100, Denis Witt wrote:
> On 07.02.2012 13:57, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>
> >>I wonder if there is an easy solution to disallow a
> >>specific sender (From-Header) to send e-mails to non
> >>$mydestination addresses.
>
> >Check smtpd_sender_restrictions and/or
> >
On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 16:46 +0800, Joe Wong wrote:
> I read the details of the multiple instance support but it's not clear
> to me how I can use it to achieve my goal. Do anyone have similar
> setup and share your configuration here?
Please don't top post.
You'll have to give some more details a
Hi all,
I have configured a Postfix e-mail server but all emails sent to
Hotmail.com go to the trash... the first question is... configuring
SPF should solve that?
If yes, what is the best way of configuring SPF in Postfix + Dovecot?
Some clues?
Best Regards,
Am 09.02.2012 01:15, schrieb Andre Lopes:
> Hi all,
>
> I have configured a Postfix e-mail server but all emails sent to
> Hotmail.com go to the trash... the first question is... configuring
> SPF should solve that?
SHOULD LOGS
how should anybody gues what can solve this if
nobody is knwoing t
Andre Lopes:
> If yes, what is the best way of configuring SPF in Postfix + Dovecot?
> Some clues?
See: http://www.openspf.net/Implementations
Implementations that use the Sendmail Milter protocol may also work
with Postfix.
Wietse
Hi all,
Thanks for the reply's.
Maybe I have not explained well my problem. I have configured a new
e-mail server for a new domain, but the problem with Hotmail is old in
other websites that I have configured, the e-mails sent go directly to
the trash. Anyone have ever had the same problem with H
On 2/8/2012 6:42 PM, Andre Lopes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for the reply's.
>
> Maybe I have not explained well my problem. I have configured a new
> e-mail server for a new domain, but the problem with Hotmail is old in
> other websites that I have configured, the e-mails sent go directly to
>
you are not willing to understand that if some other
server is trahsing mails you sent and you are speaking
of SPF that there is nothing to configure in YOUR MAILSERVER
SPF is a DNS record you define in your nameserver
the other server may look if you defined one and verify it
there is no single p
Hi,
I'd like to know if anyone here has any thoughts or opinions about the
best linux filesystem to use for an email system. There will be some
small amount of website data on the system (including webmail to read
the emails), although I could move that to another partition if need
be.
Anyone use
Hello Andy,
Sorry I should state the details initially. I am hosting multiple domains say
joe.com
jay.net
some other domains
I would like to route email sent from user in joe.com through IP
address 1, user in jay.net via IP address 2, the rest go through IP
address 3.
after looking into the mu
Looking for suggestions on classes or consulting with an educational aspect for
advanced postfix administration in and around the upper Midwest US (we are open
to any classes in Hawaii :). By the way, big thanks to the people that use
this list for providing a better support structure than any
On 8 Feb 2012, at 20:19, Ori Bani wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to know if anyone here has any thoughts or opinions about the
best linux filesystem to use for an email system. There will be some
small amount of website data on the system (including webmail to read
the emails), although I could move that
On 2/8/2012 7:21 PM, Joe Wong wrote:
> Hello Andy,
>
> Sorry I should state the details initially. I am hosting multiple domains say
>
> joe.com
> jay.net
> some other domains
>
> I would like to route email sent from user in joe.com through IP
> address 1, user in jay.net via IP address 2, the
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 17:19:05 -0800, Ori Bani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to know if anyone here has any thoughts or opinions about the
> best linux filesystem to use for an email system. There will be some
> small amount of website data on the system (including webmail to read
> the emails), althoug
Hello Noel,
The IP I mentioned was not the remote IP, but the IP address in the
oubound MTA machine.
- Joe
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 2/8/2012 7:21 PM, Joe Wong wrote:
>> Hello Andy,
>>
>> Sorry I should state the details initially. I am hosting multiple domains
On 2/8/2012 9:24 PM, Joe Wong wrote:
> Hello Noel,
>
> The IP I mentioned was not the remote IP, but the IP address in the
> oubound MTA machine.
>
> - Joe
[please don't top post]
Indeed. Use sender_dependent_default_transport_maps to select a
transport defined in master.cf that is bound to a
Greetings,
Reindi, search through postfix docs for that:
+ permit_sasl_authenticated
+ permit_mynetworks (play with the mynetworks definition, so,
initially you allow all mail from your local network, and when *all*
of your users moved to new authenticated schema, you just removed
local network
Am 09.02.2012 04:49, schrieb Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa:
> Greetings,
>
> Reindi, search through postfix docs for that:
>
> + permit_sasl_authenticated
> + permit_mynetworks (play with the mynetworks definition, so,
> initially you allow all mail from your local network, and when *all*
> of
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 2/8/2012 9:24 PM, Joe Wong wrote:
>> Hello Noel,
>>
>> The IP I mentioned was not the remote IP, but the IP address in the
>> oubound MTA machine.
>>
>> - Joe
>
>
> [please don't top post]
>
> Indeed. Use sender_dependent_default_transport_m
Well,
There are a number of reasons. Like for example, stopping emails from
non-existed users, or stopping email bombing from "zombie" PCs.
The majority of emails in the queues of my MTA is backscatter and one of the
ways to reduce it is SMTP Auth.
More important thought is the need to enable
Well, I believe you meaning: reject_unauthenticated_sender_login_mismatch.
I tried that on my test env, but I did not add the permit_sasl_authenticated
and I had issues. Now, it's better, thanks!
I still need the "DSN" style message back for those users and I hope to have
some ideas.
- Αρ
I am trying to validate email ids of subscribers coming to my site
Is there a standard regular expression for email id syntax that
confirms to rfc822.
I want to avoid junk entries from entering my database.
Postfix already checks this syntax in RCPT-TO , but is this regex
available alread
47 matches
Mail list logo
