milter adding header possible bug

Hi, it's a question more like to developers. I'm using commercial anti-spam Milter. It adds some headers to message, particularly, X-SpamTest-Status and X-SpamTest-Status-Extended. Problem is that only latter of these two appears in message. More of it, two copies of these header are added to

Re: Postfix stable release 2.9.0

On 2/2/2012 12:01 πμ, Reindl Harald wrote: rebuild postfix usually is a work of 5 minutes was there and distributed 2.8.8 two hours ago to 20 machines via RPM Hi, Where can we find a 2.8.x .src.rpm with *standard* Centos 5 postfix features (ldap, sasl, tls etc.) Thanks, Nick

Restrict No. of Messages from a particular sender.

Hi, Is there any possibility of restricting a user to send particluar no. of messages. e.g. 100 messages a day. If yes, how to do it. Rgds, Santosh

Re: Restrict No. of Messages from a particular sender.

Am 02.02.2012 11:26, schrieb santosh malavade: > Hi, > > > Is there any possibility of restricting a user to send particluar no. of > messages. e.g. 100 messages a day. If yes, how to do it. > > > Rgds, > > > Santosh you need a policy service for that perhaps take a look at http://www.poli

Re: Pflogsumm Version 1.1.4 Released

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:07 PM, James Seymour wrote: > On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:23:46 -0500 (EST) > Wietse Venema wrote: > > [snip] > > > > Thanks, Jim. > > You're welcome, Wietse. And thank *you* for Postfix. > > Regards, > Jim > -- > Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam > fi

Re: milter adding header possible bug

Vladimir Vassiliev: > > Hi, > > it's a question more like to developers. > I'm using commercial anti-spam Milter. It adds some headers to message, > particularly, > X-SpamTest-Status and X-SpamTest-Status-Extended. Problem is that only latter > of these two appears > in message. More of it, t

Re: warning: /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd: bad command startup -- throttling

Kshitij, > Feb 1 10:21:43 D1OKH680RL postfix/master[11324]: warning: process > /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd pid 11339 killed by signal 11 The smtpd service crashed with segmentation violation (SEGV). There is something wrong with your installation of postfix or libraries (like database access).

SASL and Postfix

My ISP has recently changed my mail server so that I am forced to use authentication. I am using SASL with a hash file. That all seems to be working. However, I am unable to send mail because for some reason postfix is not sending a MAIL FROM command. The relevant sequence of messages I get fro

Re: SASL and Postfix

The article they link to doesn't exist anymore, but I'm wondering if you need to be using a certain from address, or possibly a certain from domain ( ie; http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_sender_login_maps)... That's what the first line suggests to me.. Il 02/02/2012 15.34, Dennis

PATCH: milter adding header possible bug

Vladimir Vassiliev: > Hi, > > it's a question more like to developers. > I'm using commercial anti-spam Milter. It adds some headers to message, > particularly, > X-SpamTest-Status and X-SpamTest-Status-Extended. Problem is that only latter > of these two appears > in message. More of it, two

Re: SASL and Postfix

Dennis Putnam: > My ISP has recently changed my mail server so that I am forced to use > authentication. I am using SASL with a hash file. That all seems to be > working. However, I am unable to send mail because for some reason > postfix is not sending a MAIL FROM command. The relevant sequence

Re: SASL and Postfix

Hi Nick, Thanks for the reply. That link is bad but I have gone to the correct one. What it is saying is that the from address is not locally known so it will bounce the mail. That is really a symptom caused by the MAIL FROM not being sent. Since there is no from address, it cannot verify it

Re: SASL and Postfix

Am 02.02.2012 16:04, schrieb Dennis Putnam: > Hi Nick, > > Thanks for the reply. That link is bad but I have gone to the correct one. > What it is saying is that the from > address is not locally known so it will bounce the mail. That is really a > symptom caused by the MAIL FROM not being > s

Re: SASL and Postfix

Dennis Putnam: > Thanks but I don't see the relevance of this to my postfix > configuration. Wong link? According to the SMTP server's reply, you need to set up a verified sender address. I't up to you to decide if that is relevant. Wietse > On 02/02/2012 10:01 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:

Re: SASL and Postfix

But your link appears to be for mail clients. I'm not using a mail client other than sendmail. The from addresses already match AT&T mailbox names. Perhaps I am missing what the MAIL FROM is really supposed to be. On 02/02/2012 10:16 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Dennis Putnam: Thanks but I don't

Re: SASL and Postfix

Am 02.02.2012 16:22, schrieb Dennis Putnam: > But your link appears to be for mail clients. I'm not using a mail > client other than sendmail. this does not interest the server on the other side for him you are a client like each other > The from addresses already match AT&T mailbox names.

Re: SASL and Postfix

Am 02.02.2012 16:36, schrieb Dennis Putnam: > Actually it is AT&T and they subcontract out their mail services to Yahoo. > That is the transition I am trying to > resolve. However, you have jogged something in my mind. Although my Postfix > is authenticating as a legitimate user > to the yahoo

Re: SASL and Postfix

Sorry, I hit the reply rather than the reply all. This is the only discussion list I'm on that does not put the mailing list address in a reply-to or to. I mostly lurk here so by habit I just use reply. Anyway, thanks and I think I understand what I need to do. I don't think postscript can be

Re: SASL and Postfix

Dennis Putnam: > Thanks but I don't see the relevance of this to my postfix > configuration. Wong link? Wietse: > According to the SMTP server's reply, you need to set up a verified > sender address. Dennis Putnam: > But your link appears to be for mail clients. I'm not using a mail > client oth

Re: Postfix stable release 2.9.0

On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:00:56PM -0800, Ori Bani wrote: > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Simon Brereton > wrote: > > The OP has decided - and he has that right - that only Mudd's > > rpm's will do. > > Yes, as they've built a reputation for being quite reliable and > well done. Agreed, Simo

Re: Please Help: Relay Access Denied

On 2/2/2012 12:56 AM, Uma Shankar wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I am stuck at a small configuration. I want my server to only send > mail from specific domains. I have done entries in main.cf > in $mydomain and relay_domains=$mydestination , > $mydomain but still when I am sending the mai

Re: Basic sending concurrency question

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 02:33:53PM -0800, Peter Scott wrote: > Sending mail via Amazon happens via piping it to a program that > makes an HTTP connection. This takes about 0.5 seconds. Postfix is a SMTP-Server/-Client, no HTTP-Client. > W

Pflogsumm: Specialization in SMTPD connections

On 1/2/2012 6:00 μμ, James Seymour wrote: rel-1.1.4 20120201 Thank you James for offering and supporting this great tool. I have upgraded to v1.1.4 and it runs smoothly on our CentOS 5.7. A question on pflogsumm: Is there a way to include stats on SMTPD connections from particular or

Messages from=<> and pflogsumm

Hello, In the logs, there are cases where some message seems to be coming from=<>. This seems to be happening when local Postfix returns some delivery report to sender (sender delivery status notification). In such cases PFLOGSUMM, instead of a domain name or full sender address, displays in

problem with postfix receiving mail

From: Sasse, Fred (DNR) Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 4:05 PM To: 'postfix-users@postfix.org' Subject: problem with postfix receiving mail Hello I am trying to get postfix to receive mail with not any success. I am running SLES 11.1 and Postfix 2.5. Mail outbound is fine to everywhere. Mai

Throttling incoming email

Hi, I have a fedora15 installation with postfix-2.8.7 and would like to throttle the message rate for incoming mail from senders like constantcontact and other bulk senders. I've read about greylisting, but I'm not sure what's what I'm looking for, due to the inherent side-effects. Is it possible

Re: problem with postfix receiving mail

On 2/2/2012 4:13 PM, Sasse, Fred (DNR) wrote: > [post in plain-text only please] > /var/log/mail shows no errors. So what does it show when receiving mail? Anything at all? > I did try telnet (servername) 25 and it is not blocked by iptables. Did you try this from some external computer or

RE: problem with postfix receiving mail

I tail /var/spool/mail/root and it doesn't show message received at all. telnet (servername) 25 works fine from any other server and also my workstation inside the network. Thanks for your response. I do have a working server that I am comparing main.cf and master.cf. To test mail I am using t

Re: problem with postfix receiving mail

On 2/2/2012 4:45 PM, Sasse, Fred (DNR) wrote: > I tail /var/spool/mail/root and it doesn't show message received at all. > telnet (servername) 25 works fine from any other server and also my > workstation inside the network. So does postfix log anything when you telnet to it? Can you manually se

Re: Throttling incoming email

On 2/2/2012 4:39 PM, Alex wrote: > Hi, > > I have a fedora15 installation with postfix-2.8.7 and would like to > throttle the message rate for incoming mail from senders like > constantcontact and other bulk senders. I've read about greylisting, > but I'm not sure what's what I'm looking for, due

RE: problem with postfix receiving mail

Thank you, I am able to see the message was received using telnet to send the message. I can see the message in /var/mail/root. So telnet mail works but not other mail. That is a good starting point, but I don't know what to do next? Thank you for your help so far !!! -Original Message--

Re: Pflogsumm: Specialization in SMTPD connections

On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:06:32 +0200 Nikolaos Milas wrote: > On 1/2/2012 6:00 μμ, James Seymour wrote: > > > rel-1.1.4 20120201 > > Thank you James for offering and supporting this great tool. You're welcome. > [snip] > > Is there a way to include stats on SMTPD connections from > particula

Re: Messages from=<> and pflogsumm

On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:49:19 +0200 Nikolaos Milas wrote: > Hello, > > In the logs, there are cases where some message seems to be coming > from=<>. That's because they are. > [snip] > > In such cases PFLOGSUMM, instead of a domain name or full sender > address, displays in the stats "from=<

Re: problem with postfix receiving mail

On 2/2/2012 5:27 PM, Sasse, Fred (DNR) wrote: > Thank you, I am able to see the message was received using telnet to send the > message. > I can see the message in /var/mail/root. > > So telnet mail works but not other mail. That is a good starting point, but > I don't know what to do next? If

Re: problem with postfix receiving mail

I can telnet 156.98.124.26 25 from out here. So I would agree your postfix looks fine. What MX record is suppose to get people to 156.98.124.26 ? Penguin Toes

Re: difference between /usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail and /usr/sbin/sendmail.postfix ?

Thanks All. A few firm boundaries does wonder for the chaos. -- Cocktail in hand now --- Penguin Five Toes

policy_time_limit gone in 2.9

Bug or Doco miss-print? SMTPD_POLICY_README on web and in source readme file says: 11 policy_time_limit = 3600 Note: the "policy_time_limit" parameter will not show up in "postconf" command output before Postfix version 2.9. This (Fair enough, it's been working for years anyway) Starting