Re: Restricting port 25 with cidr table

2012-01-21 Thread Nikolaos Milas
On 20/1/2012 10:54 μμ, Wietse Venema wrote: > seems to me the same to use: > smtpd_client_restrictions = check_client_access > cidr:/etc/postfix/gwservers.cidr > where gwservers.cidr is: > xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx OK > xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx OK > 0.0.0.0/0 reject unauthori

Re: could not find any active network interfaces (no IPv6)

2012-01-21 Thread Nikolaos Milas
On 21/1/2012 2:49 πμ, Wietse Venema wrote: Try using strace. See http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html Trying to help from my past experience, I add here some details on this (I used Postfix 2.8.5 on CentOS 6 64bit): I added in /etc/postfix/main.cf: debugger_command = PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:

Re: forwarding to 2 domains

2012-01-21 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:35:50 +, João Pagaime wrote: I almost got away with a configuration like this at " /etc/postfix/virtual" @DOM.com@DOM1.com, @DOM2.com u...@dom.comu...@dom1.com,u...@dom2.com this is the syntax, stop using catchall

Re: Declaring options for submission port daemon

2012-01-21 Thread Mark Alan
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:10:00 -0500 (EST), Wietse Venema wrote: > I found these with: postconf | grep '[A-Z][A-Z][A-Z]:' :-) postconf | grep '[A-Z][A-Z][A-Z]:' :-) results in: bash: syntax error near unexpected token `)' ... and at my system man grep refuses to show what that last :-) switch

Re: Postfix very slow accepting a mail having a massive recipient list

2012-01-21 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 20.01.2012 16:01, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 1/20/2012 1:50 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote: > >> Please excuse me for the somewhat harsh words, but except of the >> alignment issues which should be solved for once when partitioning >> and creating filesystem, the rest is a complete bullshit collected

Re: Postfix very slow accepting a mail having a massive recipient list

2012-01-21 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 21.01.2012 15:42, Michael Tokarev wrote: > On 20.01.2012 16:01, Stan Hoeppner wrote: [] >> As it turns out the OP has Seagate LP drives which are not Advanced >> Format 512/4096 drives. No alignment issue there. > > I never had/usd these so don't know. Apparently the LP drives > are more opti

Re: could not find any active network interfaces (no IPv6)

2012-01-21 Thread Wietse Venema
Wietse Venema: > Try using strace. See http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html Alternatively, try Postfix 2.9.0-RC1. This has some failure tolerance features built-in, and may produce more informative diagnostics. Wietse

Re: Problem with SMTPs SSL_accept error | lost connection after CONNECT

2012-01-21 Thread Noel Jones
On 1/21/2012 12:05 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote: >>> Jan 18 18:20:54 newmail postfix/smtpd[83432]: lost connection >>> after CONNECT from >>> adsl-99-98-44-85.dsl.lsan03.sbcglobal.net[99.98.44.85] > >>> What would you advise me to further debug this ? > > CONNECT is a non SMTP protocol, are you runni

Re: Declaring options for submission port daemon

2012-01-21 Thread Noel Jones
On 1/21/2012 5:08 AM, Mark Alan wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:10:00 -0500 (EST), Wietse Venema > wrote: > >> I found these with: postconf | grep '[A-Z][A-Z][A-Z]:' :-) > > postconf | grep '[A-Z][A-Z][A-Z]:' :-) results in: > bash: syntax error near unexpected token `)' > > ... and at my sy

Re: Postfix very slow accepting a mail having a massive recipient list

2012-01-21 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 1/21/2012 6:53 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote: > On 21.01.2012 15:42, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> On 20.01.2012 16:01, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > [] >>> As it turns out the OP has Seagate LP drives which are not Advanced >>> Format 512/4096 drives. No alignment issue there. >> >> I never had/usd these so

Postfix 2.8 + and Berkerley DB > 4.7

2012-01-21 Thread The Doctor
Any issues with Berkeley DB > 4.7 with current Postfix ? -- Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising! https://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Birthdate : 29 Jan 1969 Croydon, Surre