Can I configure my postfix server to send all bounces to a single
mailbox , instead of the sender of the mail
Hello list,
I have come here with hesitation as I don't know exactly where should I ask
this question.
Hope to have some enlightenment from you.
I have running mailman and postfix on the same server. I had to add the
following into main.cf to
integrate mailman into postfix
`
al
On 01/02/2012 02:00 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
I have a 'border' postfix MTA that doesn't host any mailboxes, indeed it
doesn't even know what the valid usernames are for the domain.
It merely serves to check messages for viruses, and block DoS attacks.
As such, I need it to perform aliasin
On 2012-01-02 7:17 AM, Ram wrote:
Can I configure my postfix server to send all bounces to a single
mailbox , instead of the sender of the mail
In 99.9% of cases, doing this would be a very bad idea.
As you were advised in the welcome message you received when signing up
for this list, pleas
On 01/02/2012 01:17 PM, Ram wrote:
Can I configure my postfix server to send all bounces to a single
mailbox , instead of the sender of the mail
No.
--
J.
On 1/1/2012 11:19 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> I am using the following directive for filtering. The mail goes
> through 2 grey listing filters, bl lookup using policy_daemon, dkim,
> spf, dspam, etc... I don't want to start adding a whitelist entry to
> every filter.
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrict
Today I wanted to give postfix-2.9-20111230-nonprod a spin, but got
this:
...
gcc -Wmissing-prototypes -Wformat -Wl,--as-needed -DUSE_TLS -DHAS_PCRE
-DHAS_CDB -DHAS_LDAP -DSNAPSHOT -DNONPROD -g -O -I. -DLINUX3 -c dict.c
dict.c:377:9: warning: no previous prototype for 'dict_error'
[-Wmissing-pr
On Jan 2, 2012, at 2:29 AM, J. Bakshi wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have come here with hesitation as I don't know exactly where should I ask
> this question.
> Hope to have some enlightenment from you.
> …
> Now the mailserver has been moved to a different server. How can I inform
> mailman abo
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> dict_cdb.c: In function 'dict_cdbq_lookup':
> dict_cdb.c:106:5: error: 'dict_errno' undeclared (first use in this function)
> dict_cdb.c:106:5: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for
> each function it appears in
s/dict_errno/dict->error/
Wietse
* Wietse Venema :
> Ralf Hildebrandt:
> > dict_cdb.c: In function 'dict_cdbq_lookup':
> > dict_cdb.c:106:5: error: 'dict_errno' undeclared (first use in this
> > function)
> > dict_cdb.c:106:5: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > for each function it appears in
>
> s/dict_
Hello,
You can put this lines on main.cf
notify_classes = resource, software, bounce
bounce_notice_recipient = bou...@yourdomain.com
Cheers,
Otthon Coelho
At 12:59 02/01/2012, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-01-02 7:17 AM, Ram wrote:
Can I configure my postfix server to send all bounces
On Monday, January 02, 2012 at 16:39:47 UTC, otthoncoe...@yahoo.com.br
confabulated:
> Hello,
> You can put this lines on main.cf
> notify_classes = resource, software, bounce
> bounce_notice_recipient = bou...@yourdomain.com
The bounce_notice_recipient would receive a copy of the messa
On Monday 02 January 2012 10:39:47 Otthon Yahoo wrote:
> You can put this lines on main.cf
>
> notify_classes = resource, software, bounce
> bounce_notice_recipient = bou...@yourdomain.com
Wrong, that is not what the OP asked. A bounce *notice* is not the
bounce itself.
> At 12:59 02/01/2012, C
On Monday 02 January 2012 09:26:18 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 1/1/2012 11:19 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> > I am using the following directive for filtering. The mail goes
> > through 2 grey listing filters, bl lookup using policy_daemon,
> > dkim, spf, dspam, etc... I don't want to start adding a
On 1/2/12 7:08 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 01/02/2012 02:00 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> I have a 'border' postfix MTA that doesn't host any mailboxes, indeed it
>> doesn't even know what the valid usernames are for the domain.
>>
>> It merely serves to check messages for viruses, and block
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 06:00:46PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> I have a 'border' postfix MTA that doesn't host any mailboxes, indeed it
> doesn't even know what the valid usernames are for the domain.
>
> It merely serves to check messages for viruses, and block DoS attacks.
>
> As such,
telnet localhost 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1).
Escape character is '^]'.
220 AAA-AAD..com ESMTP Postfix
ehlo localhost
250-AAA-AAD..com
250-PIPELINING
250-SIZE 31457280
250-VRFY
250-ETRN
250-STARTTLS
250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN
250-A
* Pls ignore this figured it out. It was disabled.
Thanks
telnet localhost 25
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> Connected to localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1).
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 220 AAA-AAD..com ESMTP Postfix
> ehlo localhost
> 250-AAA-AAD..com
> 250-PIPELINING
18 matches
Mail list logo
