Re: Dead Destination configuration

Can you please name the topic, so I can search about it? It would be of great help. On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: > On 2011-12-05 15:36, DN Singh wrote: > >> Yes, I tried to figure it out that way, but the numbers aren't constant. >> > > Have you considered that this is

Re: Dead Destination configuration

Am 06.12.2011 10:02, schrieb DN Singh: > Can you please name the topic, so I can search about it? It would be of > great help. look here for basic ideas http://configs.blogspot.com/2010/05/postfix-fallback-relay.html study http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_fallback_relay > > On Mon,

Re: hide private ip in header

Thanks for suggestion.   I have created header_check filter with following but no success. /^Received:.*\[127\.0\.0\.1/ IGNORE /^Received:.*\[10\.2\.1\.83/ IGNORE /^Received:.*\[192\.168\.1\.[0-9]/ IGNORE anything i am missing. Regards, Ramesh

Log/convert users plain password

Hi, I have Postfix + OpenLdap + DoveCot configuration, and it's running succesfuly, i wantto convert users pop3 password NTPassword and LMPassword, so i ne plain passwor dof users, how can i do that. (Normaly using perl's ntlmgen function i convert password , but in plain) (both smtp or pop3)

Re: Log/convert users plain password

Am 06.12.2011 14:07, schrieb Selcuk Yazar: > > Hi, > > I have Postfix + OpenLdap + DoveCot configuration, and it's running > succesfuly, > > i wantto convert users pop3 password NTPassword and LMPassword, so i ne plain > passwor dof users, > > how can i do that. (Normaly using perl's ntlmge

Re: Log/convert users plain password

Hi, i actualyy logging users' password in plain format in server side. thanks. On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 06.12.2011 14:07, schrieb Selcuk Yazar: > > > > Hi, > > > > I have Postfix + OpenLdap + DoveCot configuration, and it's running > succesfuly, > > > > i w

Re: hide private ip in header

Ramesh: > Thanks for suggestion. > I have created header_check filter with following but no success. > /^Received:.*\[127\.0\.0\.1/ IGNORE > /^Received:.*\[10\.2\.1\.83/ IGNORE > /^Received:.*\[192\.168\.1\.[0-9]/ IGNORE > > anything i am missing. You are deleting the headers in mail

Re: hide private ip in header

On 12/6/2011 6:47 AM, Ramesh wrote: > Thanks for suggestion. > > I have created header_check filter with following but no success. > > /^Received:.*\[127\.0\.0\.1/ IGNORE > /^Received:.*\[10\.2\.1\.83/ IGNORE > /^Received:.*\[192\.168\.1\.[0-9]/ IGNORE > > anything i am missing. [D

Re: Log/convert users plain password

dovecot.conf: auth_mechanisms = CRAM-MD5 DIGEST-MD5 APOP NTLM PLAIN LOGIN Am 06.12.2011 14:17, schrieb Selcuk Yazar: > i actualyy logging users' password in plain format in server side. > > thanks. > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Reindl Harald > wrote: > > >

Re: Non-encoded 8bit data in header?

Le 2011-12-05 13:48, Ralf Hildebrandt a écrit : * Pierre Girard: The email is sent automatically by the autoupdate program and it's using mail/mailx to send it. In that case I'd blame mail/mailx :) Are you sure it's using those instead of just piping to sendmail? I'm pretty sure. There's thi

upgraded postfix. won't start

Freebsd 7.2 was postfix from last march, 2.8? upgraded to postfix-current 2.9-2025 Dec 6 11:54:42 mx1..net/mx1..net postfix/master[14638]: warning: process /usr/local/libexec/postfix/qmgr pid 14721 exit status 1 Dec 6 11:54:42 mx1..net/mx1..net postfix/master[14638]: warni

Re: upgraded postfix. won't start

Len Conrad : > Freebsd 7.2 > > was postfix from last march, 2.8? > > upgraded to postfix-current 2.9-2025 > > Dec 6 11:54:42 mx1..net/mx1..net postfix/master[14638]: warning: > process /usr/local/libexec/postfix/qmgr pid 14721 exit status 1 How many versions of Berkeley DB are the

Re: upgraded postfix. won't start

-- Original Message -- From: Wietse Venema Reply-To: Postfix users Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:05:39 -0500 (EST) >Len Conrad : >> Freebsd 7.2 >> >> was postfix from last march, 2.8? >> >> upgraded to postfix-current 2.9-2025 >> >> Dec 6 11:54:42 mx1.

Re: upgraded postfix. won't start

-- Original Message -- From: "Len Conrad " Reply-To: Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 19:11:47 +0100 >-- Original Message -- >From: Wietse Venema >Reply-To: Postfix users >Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:05:39 -0500 (EST) > >>Len

bounce problem

I use Kerio for email service and have setup Postfix to handle outgoing email on the same hardware. I'm using Postfix for outbound email since it can be bound to a particular IP address and Kerio cannot. Setup looks like this: Kerio SMTP ---> (127.0.0.1) Postfix > (public IP) Internet My p

Re: upgraded postfix. won't start

Len Conrad : > >How many versions of Berkeley DB are there on your system? > > afaics, only one: > > pkg_info | egrep -i berk > db41-4.1.25_4 The Berkeley DB package, revision 4.1 That makes two, because you also have to the BDB version 1 that is used by the libc routines for nsswitch plu

postfix skipping bad MXs ??

I have recently upgraded a server that was running a pretty outdated postfix version (2.2.9) to a new 2.8.5. i'm facing some weird problems with a particular customer which has 2 MXs published. The first one (lower priority number) is rejecting our emails lots of times (421 You are d

Re: postfix skipping bad MXs ??

Leonardo Rodrigues: > I have recently upgraded a server that was running a pretty > outdated postfix version (2.2.9) to a new 2.8.5. > > i'm facing some weird problems with a particular customer which has > 2 MXs published. The first one (lower priority number) is rejecting our > emai

Re: bounce problem

Rick Hazey: > My problem occurs when Postfix can't deliver an email, might be a > non-existent email address for example. Postfix generates a bounce > message for the sender but won't deliver it and complains that it > "loops back on myself". You have the same myhostname on multiple servers (Postf

Re: bounce problem

Thanks for the insight. The warning "greeted me with my own hostname" appears in the log file when delivery of the bounce is attempted. Sounds like a bad assumption on my part: I assumed since it was labeled a warning it wasn't fatal but a notification. Both SMTP servers do have the same hostna

Re: bounce problem

On Tuesday 06 December 2011 12:55:18 Rick Hazey wrote: > I use Kerio for email service and have setup Postfix to handle > outgoing email on the same hardware. I'm using Postfix for > outbound email since it can be bound to a particular IP address > and Kerio cannot. Setup looks like this: I don't

Re: bounce problem

Rick Hazey: > Thanks for the insight. The warning "greeted me with my own hostname" > appears in the log file when delivery of the bounce is attempted. > Sounds like a bad assumption on my part: I assumed since it was > labeled a warning it wasn't fatal but a notification. > > Both SMTP servers do

Re: bounce problem

I had configured inet_interfaces = localhost but did not realize Postfix required a different hostname for each MTA. My lack of understanding is the problem, not Postfix. Thanks for the explanation. On Dec 6, 2011, at 4:04 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > As a matter of sanity, Postfix requires that

Re: Non-encoded 8bit data in header?

On 2011-12-06 14:51, Pierre Girard wrote: > I installed the nail package (which installed heirloom-mailx) and > that seems to be doing the encoding correctly. Since that also > changed the /etc/alternatives/mail, it should fix the automated > message as well. Since you mention "nail", I'd like to

Re: bounce problem

On Dec 6, 2011, at 4:26 PM, Rick Hazey wrote: > Thanks for the insight. The warning "greeted me with my own hostname" appears > in the log file when delivery of the bounce is attempted. Sounds like a bad > assumption on my part: I assumed since it was labeled a warning it wasn't > fatal but a

Re: hide private ip in header

Here is log at recipient end, 164.164.87.90 is public ip address and 10.3.1.83 is private ip of mail server and 192.168.1.114 is local client ip address. how to hide our private ip address (10.3.1.83 and Local subnet) ##Log Return-Path: X-YahooFilteredBulk: 164.164.87.90 Received-SPF: