Hi
I use PAM authentication method for send emal via postfix with Cyrus Sasl.
If use sasldb2 method instead PAM,it is more secure, or more Ok?Sasdb is
more usable?
Thanks
* gaby :
> I use PAM authentication method for send emal via postfix with Cyrus Sasl.
> If use sasldb2 method instead PAM,it is more secure, or more Ok?Sasdb is
> more usable?
There are two sections you need to pay attention for:
1. Transmission of identification data over the network
2. Stor
Good morning,
I configured dkim-milter (2.7.2-x) to postfix (2.7.2-x) on opensuse
11.4 64-bit, generated keys (named "mail"). In the dkim-milter config
I defined my options:
DKIM_MODES="sv"
DKIM_DOMAIN="ajetaci.cz"
DKIM_SELECTOR="mail"
DKIM_CANON="simple"
DKIM_REJECTION="bad=a,dns=t,no=a,
Am 07.11.2011 10:39, schrieb Josef Karliak:
> Good morning,
> I configured dkim-milter (2.7.2-x) to postfix (2.7.2-x) on opensuse
> 11.4 64-bit, generated keys (named "mail"). In the dkim-milter config I
> defined my options:
> DKIM_MODES="sv"
> DKIM_DOMAIN="ajetaci.cz"
> DKIM_SELECTOR="mail"
>
Am 07.11.2011 10:46, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 07.11.2011 10:39, schrieb Josef Karliak:
>> Good morning,
>> I configured dkim-milter (2.7.2-x) to postfix (2.7.2-x) on opensuse
>> 11.4 64-bit, generated keys (named "mail"). In the dkim-milter config I
>> defined my options:
>> DKIM_MODES="
Hi,
modes "sv" is configured - see my config bellow. That's crazy on
that. When I "ps -ef" :
/usr/bin/dkim-filter -p inet:8891@localhost -b sv -c simple -C
bad=a,dns=t,no=a,sec=t -d ajetaci.cz -S rsa-sha256 -s mail -k
/etc/mail/dkim/mail.private -l -h -D
Thanks
J.K.
Cituji Robert
Hi,
modes "sv" is configured - see my config bellow. That's crazy on
that. When I "ps -ef" :
/usr/bin/dkim-filter -p inet:8891@localhost -b sv -c simple -C
bad=a,dns=t,no=a,sec=t -d ajetaci.cz -S rsa-sha256 -s mail -k
/etc/mail/dkim/mail.private -l -h -D
Thanks
J.K.
Cituji Robert
In the message header I've :
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.7.2 kostnew.ajetaci.cz 8840B239C3
Authentication-Results: kostnew.ajetaci.cz; dkim=none (no signature)
header.i=unknown; dkim-adsp=fail
And in the mail log:
Nov 7 10:48:37 kostnew dkim-filter[16623]: 8840B239C3 external host
[192
Am 07.11.2011 10:56, schrieb Josef Karliak:
> In the message header I've :
> X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.7.2 kostnew.ajetaci.cz 8840B239C3
> Authentication-Results: kostnew.ajetaci.cz; dkim=none (no signature)
> header.i=unknown; dkim-adsp=fail
>
> And in the mail log:
> Nov 7 10:48:37 ko
Hi Users,
I am relaying mail for many IPs using postfix version 2.1.6. For some
particular IPs, I would like to just drop their email (rather than
turn off relaying for them). Is that possible?
I appreciate your help.
Tim
Am 07.11.2011 11:02, schrieb Timothy Smith:
> Hi Users,
>
> I am relaying mail for many IPs using postfix version 2.1.6. For some
> particular IPs, I would like to just drop their email (rather than
> turn off relaying for them). Is that possible?
>
> I appreciate your help.
>
> Tim
rejecting i
Am 07.11.2011 11:10, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 07.11.2011 11:02, schrieb Timothy Smith:
>> Hi Users,
>>
>> I am relaying mail for many IPs using postfix version 2.1.6. For some
>> particular IPs, I would like to just drop their email (rather than
>> turn off relaying for them). Is that possib
Hi,
thanks for tips, I used "-i ilistfile containing list of
internal (signing) hosts".
It is signing now, but signature fails on the verifier :
Nov 7 12:40:54 celer dkim-filter[4888]: 5CCC8C750A SSL
error:04077068:rsa routines:RSA_verify:bad signature
Nov 7 12:40:54 celer dk
Thank you Robert,
I was able to follow your instructions and achieved what I want. I am
now rejecting with a message.
Sorry about the misleading subject.
Kind Regards,
Tim
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 07.11.2011 11:02, schrieb Timothy Smith:
>> Hi Users,
>>
>>
Am 07.11.2011 12:50, schrieb Josef Karliak:
> Hi,
> thanks for tips, I used "-i ilistfile containing list of
> internal (signing) hosts".
> It is signing now, but signature fails on the verifier :
> Nov 7 12:40:54 celer dkim-filter[4888]: 5CCC8C750A SSL
> error:04077068:rsa routines:
Hi:
I have a Postfix+MySQL+Dovecot+PostfixAdmin[Lenny server] setup, and
works very nice. But I need to put quota in my webmail[RoundCube], and
after a long research in Internet, I see DoveAdm as a good option,the
issue is...
- It´s DoveAdm a command part of Dovecot, if so, where is it?
- O
On Monday, November 07, 2011 at 15:41:38 UTC, les...@electrica.cujae.edu.cu
confabulated:
> Hi:
> I have a Postfix+MySQL+Dovecot+PostfixAdmin[Lenny server] setup, and
> works very nice. But I need to put quota in my webmail[RoundCube], and
> after a long research in Internet, I see DoveAdm as a
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.8.7.html]
Postfix stable release 2.8.7 is available. This contains a workaround
for a problem that is fixed in Postfix 2.9.
* The postscreen daemon, which is not enabled by default,
On 7/11/2011 5:41 μμ, Leslie León Sinclair wrote:
But I need to put quota in my webmail
Hi,
Use postfix and dovecot, with lda or lmtp and setup quotas in dovecot.
See: http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2011-February/057630.html
Hope that helps,
Nick
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Crypto
Am 07.11.2011 15:48, schrieb Duane Hill:
> On Monday, November 07, 2011 at 15:41:38 UTC, les...@electrica.cujae.edu.cu
> confabulated:
>
>> Hi:
>
>> I have a Postfix+MySQL+Dovecot+PostfixAdmin[Lenny server] setup, and
>> works very nice. But I need to put quota in my webmail[RoundCube], and
>>
Thanks That was the clue I was needing. I had to explicitly set mynetworks on
the guest OS.
seemed to fix it.
RIck
On Nov 6, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Blair, Rick:
>> [root@guestServer init.d]# telnet fileserver 25
>> Trying 192.168.1.31...
>> Connected to fileserver.
>> Esc
The problem is the query for MySQL... I have quotas in a table in mysql,
but there´s a lot of parameters that I dont know when to use it.
For example:
1- The quota query in MySQL -> query = SELECT quota FROM mailbox WHERE
username='%s'
2- The quota query in Dovecot -> user_query = SELECT home,
The issue is that I have multiple quotas/domains, for my users. Some
users have 10MB, others have 100MB, and Admin/Root[postmaster,
webmaster, abuse, hostmaster] have 500MB and I need to fetch the quota,
for the specific user with MySQL.
Best regards.
--
/*
Am 07.11.2011 18:02, schrieb Leslie León Sinclair:
> The issue is that I have multiple quotas/domains, for my users. Some users
> have 10MB, others have 100MB, and
> Admin/Root[postmaster, webmaster, abuse, hostmaster] have 500MB and I need to
> fetch the quota, for the specific
> user with MyS
2011/11/7 Robert Schetterer :
> post your problem dkim-milter list
>
> http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=139420
FYI - that list doesn't exist any more. dkim-milter has been
deprecated in favor of OpenDKIM (http://opendkim.org/). It's an
actively-supported milter project, and switching over fro
On Monday, November 07, 2011 at 17:02:24 UTC, les...@electrica.cujae.edu.cu
confabulated:
> The issue is that I have multiple quotas/domains, for my users. Some
> users have 10MB, others have 100MB, and Admin/Root[postmaster,
> webmaster, abuse, hostmaster] have 500MB and I need to fetch the qu
On 11/07/2011 05:15 PM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
2011/11/7 Robert Schetterer:
post your problem dkim-milter list
http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=139420
FYI - that list doesn't exist any more. dkim-milter has been
deprecated in favor of OpenDKIM (http://opendkim.org/). It's an
actively-suppor
Thanks again, and sorry the thread, I´am stacked here. Almost near the
solution.
Best regards.
You should move this discussion over to the Dovecot mailing list.
--
/***
*Leslie León Sinclair
*Administrador de Redes
*Facultad de Ingenieria E
I use TLS withPAM,but what is disadvantage PAM versus sasldb ?
Sasldb is more security?
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Ben Koetter
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: sasldb or PAM
* gaby :
> I use PAM authentication method for send
* gaby :
> I use TLS withPAM,but what is disadvantage PAM versus sasldb ?
> Sasldb is more security?
sasldb must be read/write protected from other uses, but remain readable to
the user postfix or one of the groups it is in e.g. group sasl.
sasldb must reside on the same machine as the Postfix ins
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Josef Karliak
> Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 3:50 AM
> To: Robert Schetterer
> Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: dkim-milter verify, but don't sign.
>
>Hi
Hello Guys
Yesterday i buy new EMC storage and i want move few ppl from old SATA HDD to
new FC EMC HDD but i got problem and don`t know how resolve this problem mayby
You help me:
1. I mount new storage to /mnt/EMC
2. I create a /mnt/EMC/var/spool/mail/
3. i move user file (test) from /var/spool/
Marek Kr?likowski:
> Hello Guys
> Yesterday i buy new EMC storage and i want move few ppl from old SATA HDD to
> new FC EMC HDD but i got problem and don`t know how resolve this problem
> mayby You help me:
> 1. I mount new storage to /mnt/EMC
> 2. I create a /mnt/EMC/var/spool/mail/
> 3. i move
-Oryginalna wiadomość-
From: Wietse Venema
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 2:27 AM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Symlink problem = file is a symbolic link or Mailbox
vulnerable - directory /var/spool/mail must have 1777 protection
Marek Krolikowski:
Hello Guys
Yesterday i buy new EMC
We have Exchange 2010 with a few domains and have run across the need
to split outgoing mail direct to the Internet and also to smart hosts
depending on their @domain.tld. Exchange 2010 does not support this "by
design" so if Postfix does, is this functionality a relay? Looking at
the BASIC_CON
Hi,
We had a user account hacked (weak password) and our SMTP server was used for
sending spam. We discovered it after our mail server IP began to show up in
RBLs. We improved the passwords, however the question is how best to watch the
server in case a similar thing happens again.
We created
On 11/7/2011 11:13 PM, Marek Królikowski wrote:
> -Oryginalna wiadomość- From: Wietse Venema
> Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 2:27 AM
> To: Postfix users
> Subject: Re: Symlink problem = file is a symbolic link or Mailbox
> vulnerable - directory /var/spool/mail must have 1777 protection
-Oryginalna wiadomość-
From: Stan Hoeppner
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 8:26 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Symlink problem = file is a symbolic link or Mailbox
vulnerable - directory /var/spool/mail must have 1777 protection
Simply mount the EMC device to a tempora
On 11/8/2011 1:13 AM, Geert Mak wrote:
> We had a user account hacked (weak password) and our SMTP server was used for
> sending spam. We discovered it after our mail server IP began to show up in
> RBLs. We improved the passwords, however the question is how best to watch
> the server in case
On 11/8/2011 1:29 AM, Marek Krolikowski wrote:
>> -Oryginalna wiadomość- From: Stan Hoeppner
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 8:26 AM
>> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
>> Subject: Re: Symlink problem = file is a symbolic link or Mailbox
>> vulnerable - directory /var/spool/mail must have
40 matches
Mail list logo
