Janantha Marasinghe:
> Hi All,
>
> I have configured a mail system on Zarafa (collaboration platform). In
> that mails are stored on the mysql db. What i want to do is to use
> always_bcc and send all sent/recieved mail on postfix to a particular
> user but the mail to be stored on maildir for
Hi Janantha,
> I have configured a mail system on Zarafa (collaboration platform). In that
> mails are stored on the mysql db. What i want to do is to use always_bcc
> and send all sent/recieved mail on postfix to a particular user but the mail
> to be stored on maildir format. Is this possible t
Hello,
I had a look at spamass-milter and honestly I didn't like it much. The
functionality it implements is simple but the implementation is quite
convoluted in my opinion and involves
Therefore I wrote a python spamd client (to avoid having to fork twice
on each request) and python implementati
Hi all
I am using postfix 2.8.4 on centos 5.7 and I want to configure another
instance of postfix. I followed instructions in the following link
http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html but when i try to start
the second instance it does not start . I start it using command
postmulti -p
Andrew,
Yes, I agree. And furthermore, I now have some evidence that this might
have been caused by the Symantec antivirus program on the client. I am
told it did work in the past, but not recently. I will pass on your
suggestions for future reference. It does feel client side related to me.
Amira Othman:
> Hi all
>
> I am using postfix 2.8.4 on centos 5.7 and I want to configure another
> instance of postfix. I followed instructions in the following link
> http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html but when i try to start
> the second instance it does not start . I start it us
It's been a long time since I have participated in this list (goes to
show how good Postfiix is when it can run for years with so few
problems). Our company has decided to start using an outside SPAM
filtering service. Overall, this is doing a very good job. But we are
getting SPAM directly i
On 11/2/2011 10:43 AM, Keith Steensma wrote:
> It's been a long time since I have participated in this list (goes
> to show how good Postfiix is when it can run for years with so few
> problems). Our company has decided to start using an outside SPAM
> filtering service. Overall, this is doing a v
On 2011-11-02 11:43 AM, Keith Steensma wrote:
It's been a long time since I have participated in this list (goes to
show how good Postfiix is when it can run for years with so few
problems). Our company has decided to start using an outside SPAM
filtering service. Overall, this is doing a very g
Am 02.11.2011 16:43, schrieb Keith Steensma:
> It's been a long time since I have participated in this list (goes to show
> how good Postfiix is when it can run for
> years with so few problems). Our company has decided to start using an
> outside SPAM filtering service. Overall,
> this is doi
On Wednesday 02 November 2011 10:43:35 Keith Steensma wrote:
> It's been a long time since I have participated in this list (goes
> to show how good Postfiix is when it can run for years with so few
> problems). Our company has decided to start using an outside SPAM
> filtering service. Overall, t
The original message from the company said 'It's a block of 8 Class C
networks'. I (just) read things wrong. And said (to myself), 'self',
that's 8 ip's, right, right! (Dumb!!) Thanks to all.
Keith
On 11/2/2011 11:00 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Wednesday 02 November 2011 10:43:35 Keith Steensm
- PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA -
> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 20:23:08 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Wietse Venema
> Subject: Re: SASL forward problem
>
> kapetr:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I use posfix as forwarder.
> >
> > The target server is connected via stunnel4. It
> > was working, but now
> > > I have changed ISP
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 02:17:03PM +0200, Amira Othman wrote:
> I am using postfix 2.8.4 on centos 5.7 and I want to configure another
> instance of postfix. I followed instructions in the following link
> http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html but when i try to start
> the second insta
Hi list,
I would like to create autoresponder functionality in my mail system,
but I don't know how to start.
User should turn on/off autoresponder from client application and set
message text which will be send in autoreply message.
My system work on RHEL 6.1: postfix, dovecot, squirrelmail,
On 1 November 2011 18:53, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 11/1/2011 1:31 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>> On 31 October 2011 15:16, Noel Jones wrote:
>>> On 10/31/2011 12:31 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
Googling led me to this thread:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/210413
B
Today for some reason my company Postfix server is no longer working.
I'm running 'postfix-2.3.3-2.3.el5_6' & have not made any changes and
or updates to the server. I checked the queue in Postfix using
'postqueue -p' and it's backed up with the following error:
(host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 45
* Carlos Mennens :
> Today for some reason my company Postfix server is no longer working.
> I'm running 'postfix-2.3.3-2.3.el5_6' & have not made any changes and
> or updates to the server. I checked the queue in Postfix using
> 'postqueue -p' and it's backed up with the following error:
>
> (hos
kapetr:
> 220 mailout1.t-email.cz ESMTP
> EHLO 251-43-13-46.tmcz.cz
> 250-mailout1.t-email.cz
> 250-PIPELINING
> 250-SIZE 1536
> 250-VRFY
> 250-ETRN
> 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN
> 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
> 250-8BITMIME
> 250 DSN
> AUTH LOGIN
> 334 xx
> yyy
> 334
> yyy
> 2
* pch0317 :
> Hi list,
>
> I would like to create autoresponder functionality in my mail
> system, but I don't know how to start.
> User should turn on/off autoresponder from client application and
> set message text which will be send in autoreply message.
>
> My system work on RHEL 6.1: postfix
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
wrote:
> That's probably amavis, not postfix
> Look at the amavis messages in your mail.log
I think you're right. Postfix appears to be working fine. I'll view
the logs and hit up the Amavisd-new mailing list. Sadly nothing in
/var/log/maillog show
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 14:31:14 -0400
Simon Brereton wrote:
[snip]
>
> ## SPAM STUFF and REJECT CODES ##
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> reject_non_fqdn_sender,
> reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
> permit_sasl_authenticated,
> check_helo_access hash:/etc/postfix/helo_che
On 2 November 2011 15:53, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
> wrote:
>> That's probably amavis, not postfix
>> Look at the amavis messages in your mail.log
>
> I think you're right. Postfix appears to be working fine. I'll view
> the logs and hit up the Amav
Is there a command in Postfix to remove / delete all messages in the
queue? All I could find is using 'postsuper -d .
On 2 November 2011 15:53, James Seymour wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 14:31:14 -0400
> Simon Brereton wrote:
>
> [snip]
>>
>> ## SPAM STUFF and REJECT CODES ##
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>> reject_non_fqdn_sender,
>> reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
>> permit_sasl_authentic
Carlos Mennens:
> Today for some reason my company Postfix server is no longer working.
> I'm running 'postfix-2.3.3-2.3.el5_6' & have not made any changes and
> or updates to the server. I checked the queue in Postfix using
> 'postqueue -p' and it's backed up with the following error:
>
> (host 1
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:12:07 -0400
Simon Brereton wrote:
[snip]
> ... but if I put reject_unknown_recipient_domain there
> postconf.5 says it will
>
> Reject the request when Postfix is not final destination for the
> recipient domain, and the RCPT TO domain has no DNS A or MX record, or
> when i
* Carlos Mennens :
> Is there a command in Postfix to remove / delete all messages in the
> queue? All I could find is using 'postsuper -d .
postsuper -d ALL
but isn't that a bit harsh?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus
On 2 November 2011 16:26, James Seymour wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:12:07 -0400
> Simon Brereton wrote:
>
> [snip]
>> ... but if I put reject_unknown_recipient_domain there
>> postconf.5 says it will
>>
>> Reject the request when Postfix is not final destination for the
>> recipient domain, an
Simon Brereton:
> On 2 November 2011 16:26, James Seymour wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:12:07 -0400
> > Simon Brereton wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >> ... but if I put reject_unknown_recipient_domain there
> >> postconf.5 says it will
> >>
> >> Reject the request when Postfix is not final destinati
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> MIME::Parser is a Perl module. Postfix is not written in Perl.
>
>http://search.cpan.org/~dskoll/MIME-tools-5.502/lib/MIME/Parser.pm
>
> Are you using a content filter that is written in Perl?
I'm aware Postfix isn't coded in Perl. I'm g
On 11/2/2011 2:33 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>> The checks "above" permit_mynetworks and permit_sasl_authenticated
>> are checks you want applied to your networks and authenticated
>> users. Generally it's better to put those checks in
>> smtpd_sender_restrictions.
>
> But I thought the recommend
32 matches
Mail list logo
