On 10/9/2011 4:49 PM, karave...@mail.bg wrote:
> I run a couple of busy postfix MX servers with queues now on XFS:
> average: 400 deliveries per minute
> peak: 1200 deliveries per minute.
>
> 4 months ago they were hosted on 8 core Xeon, 6xSAS10k RAID 10
> machines. The spools were on ext4.
>
Firewall sitting on submission port?
suomi
On 2011-10-10 08:56, Tolga wrote:
Hi,
I was reported that the e-mails people send never get to my server. When
I first was reported, I tested and it was true. I tested some more and
found out I couldn't get e-mail when I switch to submission port. How
On 10/9/2011 6:27 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 06:03:36PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> XFS has been seeing substantial development for a few years now due to
>> interest from RedHat, who plan to make it the default RHEL filesystem in
>> the future. They've dedicated seriou
On 10/10/2011 4:18 AM, postfix wrote:
> Firewall sitting on submission port?
Log entries of the transactions would be very helpful. The list welcome
msg instructed you to include log entries. If there are no
corresponding log entries for the attempted connections that info would
be helpful as w
Sorry, I have absolutely no log for that entry. And no, there is no
firewall.
On 10/10/2011 12:41 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 10/10/2011 4:18 AM, postfix wrote:
Firewall sitting on submission port?
Log entries of the transactions would be very helpful. The list welcome
msg instructed you to
For a couple of weeks I have been using "reject_unknown_helo_hostname" in
my "smtpd_helo_restrictions". This has helped to reject some 500 unsolicited
mail messages per day, on a total of around 1500.
Unfortunately, I've had to whitelist some 10 mail servers that are
misconfigured
but legitimate
hi guys
I'm seeing a funny response from a remote Postifx server.
If I manually telnet to it, the SMTP banner comes in very slowly, one
letter at a time.
It looks like someone is manually responding :-)
Is it a postfix feature that causes this behaviour?
Thanks!!
--
Dyonisius (Dick) Visser
Sys
On 10/9/2011 3:42 PM, vg_ us wrote:
> will postmark transaction test do? here -
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2639_fs&num=1
> stop arguing - I think postmark transaction was the only relevant test
> XFS was loosing badly - not anymore...
> search www.phoronix.com for o
On 10/10/2011 4:56 AM, Tolga wrote:
> Sorry, I have absolutely no log for that entry. And no, there is no
> firewall.
Can you ping your Postfix host by name and IP address from the remote host?
--
Stan
On 10/10/2011 01:27 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 10/10/2011 4:56 AM, Tolga wrote:
Sorry, I have absolutely no log for that entry. And no, there is no
firewall.
Can you ping your Postfix host by name and IP address from the remote host?
Yes.
On 10/10/2011 1:56 AM, Tolga wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was reported that the e-mails people send never get to my server.
> When I first was reported, I tested and it was true. I tested some
> more and found out I couldn't get e-mail when I switch to submission
> port. How can I fix this? You can find my
On Monday, October 10, 2011, 06:23:07, Dyonisius (Dick) Visser wrote:
> I'm seeing a funny response from a remote Postifx server.
> If I manually telnet to it, the SMTP banner comes in very slowly, one
> letter at a time.
> It looks like someone is manually responding :-)
> Is it a postfix feature
Bron Gondwana:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 04:42:25PM -0400, vg_ us wrote:
> > will postmark transaction test do? here -
> > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2639_fs&num=1
>
> Oh:
>
> http://blog.goolamabbas.org/2007/06/17/postmark-is-not-a-mail-server-benchmark/
>
> "Th
Dyonisius (Dick) Visser:
> hi guys
>
> I'm seeing a funny response from a remote Postifx server.
> If I manually telnet to it, the SMTP banner comes in very slowly, one
> letter at a time.
> It looks like someone is manually responding :-)
>
> Is it a postfix feature that causes this behaviour?
Stan Hoeppner:
> I'll work on getting access to suitable hardware so I can publish some
> thorough first hand head-to-head numbers, hopefully with a test harness
> that will use Postfix/SMTP and Dovecot/IMAP instead of a purely
> synthetic benchmark.
Until you have first-hand experience, perhaps y
I have a cluster of mailservers , so when a mail arrives it is sent to
the actual recipient by using virtual alias maps
How can I configure postfix to send NDR's like quota bounces with the
original recipient address and not the expanded alias
Thanks
Ram
Hi,
I have a Postfix 2.7 running on our LAN to relay mails from servers
and such stuff to our hosted email service.
We have a photocopier that can also scan to PDF and email the
resulting file. Unfortunately our email-provider does not like mails
above the size of 20mb, so large scans can't get th
On 10/10/2011 9:57 AM, Anders Bruun Olsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a Postfix 2.7 running on our LAN to relay mails from servers
> and such stuff to our hosted email service.
> We have a photocopier that can also scan to PDF and email the
> resulting file. Unfortunately our email-provider does not l
How about defining your scan-transport in a transport table? did you
forget that?
suomi
On 2011-10-10 16:57, Anders Bruun Olsen wrote:
Hi,
I have a Postfix 2.7 running on our LAN to relay mails from servers
and such stuff to our hosted email service.
We have a photocopier that can also scan t
On 2011-10-10 17:30, postfix wrote:
How about defining your scan-transport in a transport table? did you
forget that?
He did not forget it; he thought using relay_transport would work for
smtpd submission.
A transport map is based on the recipient address; how would you
determine which ma
On 2011-10-10 12:22, Pim Zandbergen wrote:
For a couple of weeks I have been using "reject_unknown_helo_hostname" in
my "smtpd_helo_restrictions". This has helped to reject some 500
unsolicited
mail messages per day, on a total of around 1500.
Unfortunately, I've had to whitelist some 10 mail
On 2011-10-10 03:50, Janantha Marasinghe wrote:
Hi All,
I want to know if postfix can be used to save a copy of every e-mail
sent and received (including attachments) by a mail server for email
retention. If it could indexed for easier searching that would be great!
Thnks
J
Not postfix rel
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 05:15:20PM -0400, Simon Brereton wrote:
> postfix/smtpd[25614]: warning: TLS library problem: 25614:error:14094416:SSL
> routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:sslv3 alert certificate unknown:s3_pkt.c:1102:SSL
> alert number 46:
This client could not verify your server certificate, it
On 2011-10-10 2:56 AM, Tolga wrote:
I was reported that the e-mails people send never get to my server. When
I first was reported, I tested and it was true. I tested some more and
found out I couldn't get e-mail when I switch to submission port. How
can I fix this? You can find my postconf -n an
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:37:02PM +1030, Tom Lanyon wrote:
> > When using a LDAP lookup table the 'special_result_attribute'
> > parameter is available to allow me to recurse to other DNs [e.g.
> > recursing to members of a LDAP group]. I can also use the
> > 'leaf_result_attribute' parameter to
On Oct 10, 2011, at 10:59 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 2011-10-10 03:50, Janantha Marasinghe wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I want to know if postfix can be used to save a copy of every e-mail sent
>> and received (including attachments) by a mail server for email retention.
>> If it could indexed
I'm trying to get postgrey up and running, but I seem to have a problem
with the ordering of my restrictions.
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_sasl_authenticated,
permit_mynetworks,
reject_invalid_helo_hostname,
reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname,
reject_n
On 10/10/2011 2:32 PM, Erik Christiansson wrote:
> I'm trying to get postgrey up and running, but I seem to have a
> problem with the ordering of my restrictions.
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> permit_sasl_authenticated,
> permit_mynetworks,
> reject_invalid_helo_hostn
Hi there,
I have read some docs about virtual mailboxes and address rewrite but I
could not find a solution for my problem:
I want to have a file
/etc/postfix/virtual
containing something like
p...@stefan-bertels.destefan
anotheraddr...@yahoo.de anotheruser
thirdaddr...@gmail.
I recently was able to convince my company to move their mail off of Strongmail
and onto postfix. Everything is working great, but today a bug was found that
didn't exist while we were using Strongmail. My guess is that we're doing
something wrong and that Strongmail was just more lenient abou
On 10-10-2011 21:09, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-10-10 2:56 AM, Tolga wrote:
I was reported that the e-mails people send never get to my server. When
I first was reported, I tested and it was true. I tested some more and
found out I couldn't get e-mail when I switch to submission port. How
ca
... and I figured it out. We just need to quote the name. Thanks!
On Oct 10, 2011, at 12:57 PM, Michael Barrett wrote:
> I recently was able to convince my company to move their mail off of
> Strongmail and onto postfix. Everything is working great, but today a bug
> was found that didn't ex
Michael Barrett:
> I recently was able to convince my company to move their mail off
> of Strongmail and onto postfix. Everything is working great, but
> today a bug was found that didn't exist while we were using
> Strongmail. My guess is that we're doing something wrong and that
> Strongmail wa
Tolga:
> On 10-10-2011 21:09, Charles Marcus wrote:
> > On 2011-10-10 2:56 AM, Tolga wrote:
> >> I was reported that the e-mails people send never get to my server. When
> >> I first was reported, I tested and it was true. I tested some more and
> >> found out I couldn't get e-mail when I switch t
To deliver some users locally, see
http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.html#some_local
Wietse
On 2011-10-10 4:17 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Tolga:
On 10-10-2011 21:09, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-10-10 2:56 AM, Tolga wrote:
I was reported that the e-mails people send never get to my server. When
I first was reported, I tested and it was true. I tested some more and
found out I couldn
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Wietse Venema wrote:
To deliver some users locally, see
http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.html#some_local
Does not work. :-/
/etc/postfix/main.cf
...
virtual_alias_map = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
/etc/postfix/virtual
p...@stefa
Stefan Bertels:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > To deliver some users locally, see
> > http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.html#some_local
>
> Does not work. :-/
It works only if you follow the instructions.
> /etc/postfix/virtual
> p...@stefan-bertels.de
Hi All,
I want to know if postfix can be used to save a copy of every e-mail sent
and received (including attachments) by a mail server for email
retention. If it could indexed for easier searching that would be great!
Thnks
J
Not postfix related, but for long-term storage with optional t
On 10/10/2011 4:43 PM, andreas wrote:
> Could this variable is used with mysql table, like this
> always_bcc = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-user.cf
> If i wont this to happen system wide?
>
Perhaps surprisingly, postfix has documentation.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#always_bcc
Contrast t
Perhaps surprisingly, postfix has documentation.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#always_bcc
Contrast the above with
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#sender_bcc_maps
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#recipient_bcc_maps
-- Noel Jones
I completely misunderstood in which m
FYI: I have used postfix for years on linux ubuntu, but ubuntu has
done most of the work for me, so I am functionally a noob.
Am conversant with the command line.
I am attempting to configure postfix on a mac mini with Lion (osx
10.7).
When I run
postfix start
I get a compaint that the setgid_grou
On 10/10/2011 11:41 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-10-10 4:17 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Tolga:
On 10-10-2011 21:09, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-10-10 2:56 AM, Tolga wrote:
I was reported that the e-mails people send never get to my
server. When
I first was reported, I tested and it wa
Hello,
I have created some user like nore...@mail.com etc... where automated mails is
sent
through these users. How can I restrict these users not to receive any incoming
mail ?
TIA
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 12:05 +0530, J. Bakshi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have created some user like nore...@mail.com etc... where automated mails
> is sent
> through these users. How can I restrict these users not to receive any
> incoming mail ?
You soon will not receive any mail because you go to
Hello TIA,
If email will be send to noreply@, what you want:
1. DSN send to sender about unknown user
2. or no action?
On 11 October 2011 10:35, J. Bakshi wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have created some user like nore...@mail.com etc... where automated
> mails is sent
> through these users. How can I
Am 11.10.2011 08:35, schrieb J. Bakshi:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have created some user like nore...@mail.com etc... where automated mails
> is sent
> through these users. How can I restrict these users not to receive any
> incoming mail ?
>
> TIA
you might use an access table to reject
after all thi
47 matches
Mail list logo
