Re: postscreen stats

Am 23.08.2011 21:33, schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter: > * Wietse Venema : >> Stan Hoeppner: >>> On 8/23/2011 9:10 AM, Kov?cs J?nos wrote: Thanks Ralf! It's amazing how much spam the pregreet test and a good RBL can catch. Do you have any data on how many spam emails survived postscreen?

Re: postscreen stats

Zitat von Patrick Ben Koetter : * Wietse Venema : Stan Hoeppner: > On 8/23/2011 9:10 AM, Kov?cs J?nos wrote: > > Thanks Ralf! It's amazing how much spam the pregreet test and a good RBL can catch. > > Do you have any data on how many spam emails survived postscreen? > > Overall, Postscreen i

Re: postscreen stats

* Stan Hoeppner : > On 8/23/2011 9:10 AM, Kovács János wrote: > > Thanks Ralf! It's amazing how much spam the pregreet test and a good RBL > > can catch. > > Do you have any data on how many spam emails survived postscreen? > > Overall, Postscreen is no better nor worse at stopping spam than what

Re: postscreen stats

Let me share my own stats: I configured only the pregreet test (no rbl, no deep protocol test), and applied selective greylisting (affecting only smtp hosts with a PTR record resembling to a dialup/cable/dsl/... client hostname) after postscreen. I found that postscreen blocked 15% of the zombie

Too many TLS sessions : at sender or recipient's end?

All four of us (, , mmm, ppp) suddenly received a notification email below: An app from xxxportal.com's postfix server was sending an email to all four of our mailboxes (in sss.com.au's mail server). So is the notification below indicating we need to tune TLS at xxxportal.com's postfix se

Re: Too many TLS sessions : at sender or recipient's end?

Roger Goh: > The original message was received at Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:14:02 +0800 > from [172.19.21.28] > >- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - > > >- Transcript of session follows - while talking to > gate2.sss.com.au.: > >>> STARTTLS dialogue

Integrating a program for authentication and adding it to the makefile

Hi, I'm trying to integrate a program i wrote into postfix. The program generates a signature which i want to append to the RCPT TO command, this is part of my bachelor thesis. So i am calling my function for generating a signature in smtp_proto.c , and i want to add some librarys which i need to t

Re: Date: header - Received instead of sent?

Thank you very much! Sorry for my delayed reply. Pablo p.s. I meant to do it on time, but I realized I wasn't a member of this Group and perhaps my initial reply didn't go through for that reason. I'm now subscribed. --- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com, Victor Duchovni wrote: > > On Tue, Ju

Re: Integrating a program for authentication and adding it to the makefile

Tobias Kloht: > My problem is that it will not compile when using make, because there > are all kinds of errors with the librarys i have added, mainly > "undefined references". See the excerpt from make's error messages below. > My program does compile if i do it by hand, but i have to use some gcc

Re: Integrating a program for authentication and adding it to the makefile

First of all, thank you for your great help. It has resolved almost all of the errors. However, i still get unresolved references to some (not all!) of my references to functions of the pbc library. These are the errors: smtp_proto.o: In function `scan_element': /usr/local/src/postfix-2.6.11/src/s

Re: Integrating a program for authentication and adding it to the makefile

Tobias Kloht: > First of all, thank you for your great help. It has resolved almost > all of the errors. > However, i still get unresolved references to some (not all!) of my > references to functions of the pbc library. > > These are the errors: > smtp_proto.o: In function `scan_element': > /usr/