sender_bcc - patterns questions

2011-08-10 Thread Troy Piggins
Hi there, I have a few questions about sender_bcc_maps. Until recently I have been using these to archive sent mail with a hash table like this: us...@mydomain.com user1_s...@mydomain.com and some procmail rules took messages sent to user1_s...@mydomain.com and piped it through gzip into a mo

Re: Problem with DNS lookup when chrooted

2011-08-10 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 2011-08-10 07:10, ricardus1867 wrote: Hi! By trying to add a second postfix instance (something seems to have went terribly wrong), I managed to screw up my postfix. Badly. Nothing would work anymore. So I tried the scorched earth approach (purge, then install). That worked more or less, exc

Re: sender_bcc - patterns questions

2011-08-10 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 2011-08-10 09:20, Troy Piggins wrote: Hi there, I have a few questions about sender_bcc_maps. Until recently I have been using these to archive sent mail with a hash table like this: us...@mydomain.com user1_s...@mydomain.com and some procmail rules took messages sent to user1_s...@mydom

Re: Problem with DNS lookup when chrooted

2011-08-10 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 8/10/2011 12:10 AM, ricardus1867 wrote: > By trying to add a second postfix instance (something seems to have went > terribly wrong), I managed to screw up my postfix. Badly. Nothing would work > anymore. So I tried the scorched earth approach (purge, then install). > > That worked more or les

Re: sender_bcc - patterns questions

2011-08-10 Thread Ansgar Wiechers
On 2011-08-10 Jeroen Geilman wrote: > On 2011-08-10 09:20, Troy Piggins wrote: >> 2. Can you recommend a better or more elegant solution to the second >> part of the table with the /us...@mydomain.com/ etc? I tried using >> something like this: >> >> /(user1)@mydomain.com/ \1_s...@mydomain.

Re: sending mass mail

2011-08-10 Thread Jacqui Caren-home
On 09/08/2011 18:45, Peter Blair wrote: fail their sniff test and that's a pretty good indicator that what you're trying to do won't be very successful. Or a disreputable one will take you money, hammer out your email and ruin your business. Jacqui

Milter makros

2011-08-10 Thread Christian Roessner
Hi, I try to understand the documentation, but I fail :-) I have looked for some valuse: postconf -d milter_connect_macros milter_connect_macros = j {daemon_name} v I need {client_ptr} and {client_connections}, but do not know, how to add them. What is the syntax? Is it: milter_connect_macros

[SOLVED] Re: Milter makros

2011-08-10 Thread Christian Roessner
Hi, > postconf -d milter_connect_macros > milter_connect_macros = j {daemon_name} v okay, got it: milter_connect_macros = j {daemon_name} {client_ptr} {client_connections} v Not sure about the "v" at the _end_ of the line. But it works. Thanks Christian -- Roessner-Network-Solutions Bachelor

Re: postscreen deep protocol tests without mail delays

2011-08-10 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Noel Jones [2011.08.10.0120 +0200]: > > 10 primary-0.mx 20 secondary.mx 30 primary-1.mx > > > > In this scenario, what will the spammers hit? > > All of them. What is your intent here? My intent is to combine postscreen, using the dual-MX approach outlined by Wietse, with a physica

Re: Order of milter execution

2011-08-10 Thread Noel Jones
On 8/10/2011 1:47 AM, Steve Fatula wrote: Using Postfix 2.8.4, I have the following options to smtpd: -o content_filter=dspam:unix:/var/dspam/dspam.sock -o smtpd_milters=unix:/var/run/clamav/clamav-milter.sock,unix:/var/run/opendkim/opendkim.sock,unix:/usr/local/var/milter-greylist/milter-greyl

Re: postscreen deep protocol tests without mail delays

2011-08-10 Thread Noel Jones
On 8/10/2011 5:14 AM, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Noel Jones [2011.08.10.0120 +0200]: 10 primary-0.mx 20 secondary.mx 30 primary-1.mx In this scenario, what will the spammers hit? All of them. What is your intent here? My intent is to combine postscreen, using the dual-MX approach

Re: Problem with DNS lookup when chrooted

2011-08-10 Thread ricardus1867
That did it. Thanks! ricardus Jeroen Geilman wrote: > > On 2011-08-10 07:10, ricardus1867 wrote: >> Hi! >> >> By trying to add a second postfix instance (something seems to have went >> terribly wrong), I managed to screw up my postfix. Badly. Nothing would >> work >> anymore. So I tried the s

Re: Problem with DNS lookup when chrooted

2011-08-10 Thread ricardus1867
> Chroot and multiple instance support are, or should be, handled properly by the Postfix init scripts. should be. Exactly! I did the re-install with a single instance, but it was troublesome. dpkg kept throwing errors because of some post-installation modifications. The second instance effective

building mail server on virtual machine

2011-08-10 Thread Amira Othman
Hi all, I need to configure postfix on virtual machine for testing purpose but I don't know how to do that as I don't have mx record .is there something to do so simulate that something like virtual mx record . Regards Amira Othman Server Administrator www.ca

Re: building mail server on virtual machine

2011-08-10 Thread Erwan Loaëc
Depending of the test purpose, a A record can be enough to have a working solution. -- Erwan Loaec Amira Othman wrote: Hi all, I need to configure postfix on virtual machine for testing purpose but I don’t know how to do that as I don’t have mx record .is there something to do so simulate

Re: building mail server on virtual machine

2011-08-10 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 2011-08-10 15:15, Amira Othman wrote: Hi all, I need to configure postfix on virtual machine for testing purpose but I don't know how to do that as I don't have mx record .is there something to do so simulate that something like virtual mx record . MX records are not required for funct

postfix with archiving and e-discovery

2011-08-10 Thread Donny Brooks
Hello all, I have done some research on this but cannot find an easy to implement solution that doesn't need us to send our mail to an outside company. We need an in-house email archiving and e-discovery solution that would work with our existing postfix/dovecot setup. Being a state gove

Re: postscreen deep protocol tests without mail delays

2011-08-10 Thread Wietse Venema
martin f krafft: > My theory was that spammers would try the lowest priority MX first > (primary-1.mx), in this case the second IP on the main MX. With my two MX records pointing to one host, about 10% of spambots goes to the backup IP address only. Thus, MX policy enforcement stops only a small p

RE: Order of milter execution

2011-08-10 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
> -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org > [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Steve Fatula > Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 11:48 PM > To: Postfix Users > Subject: Order of milter execution > > Using Postfix 2.8.4, I have the following options to smt

Re: Problem with DNS lookup when chrooted

2011-08-10 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 8/10/2011 9:17 AM, ricardus1867 wrote: > >> Chroot and multiple instance support are, or should be, handled properly > by the Postfix init scripts. > > should be. Exactly! I did the re-install with a single instance, but it was > troublesome. dpkg kept throwing errors because of some post-inst

Re: Sending massive mails

2011-08-10 Thread Peter Blair
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Bjron Mork wrote: > I do have the same concerns, is there any way to implement users bases > sending policies through postfix … Not really. Postfix accepts messages into one of its queues, and will pick those messages up (depending on its retry formula) and attemp

Re: Order of milter execution

2011-08-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Murray S. Kucherawy: > > -Original Message- > > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org > > [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Steve Fatula > > Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 11:48 PM > > To: Postfix Users > > Subject: Order of milter execution > > > > Using Postfix 2.8.4

Re: Sending massive mails

2011-08-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Peter Blair: > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Bjron Mork wrote: > > I do have the same concerns, is there any way to implement users bases > > sending policies through postfix ? > > Not really. Postfix accepts messages into one of its queues, and will > pick those messages up (depending on its

Re: Problem with DNS lookup when chrooted

2011-08-10 Thread ricardus1867
I'm running Ubuntu 10.04 and I installed Postfix 2.8.4 from Christian Roessner's PPA. ricardus Stan Hoeppner wrote: > > On 8/10/2011 9:17 AM, ricardus1867 wrote: >> >>> Chroot and multiple instance support are, or should be, handled properly >> by the Postfix init scripts. >> >> should be.

Re: Order of milter execution

2011-08-10 Thread Steve Fatula
> From: Wietse Venema > To: Postfix users > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 12:03 PM > Subject: Re: Order of milter execution > >> In the sendmail implementation, milters operate in order specifically >> so that filters later in the chain see the effects of those that >> come before.

Re: Problem with DNS lookup when chrooted

2011-08-10 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 8/10/2011 3:07 PM, ricardus1867 wrote: > > I'm running Ubuntu 10.04 and I installed Postfix 2.8.4 from Christian > Roessner's PPA. I just went through the Debian 6.x Postfix 2.7.1 init script, and I'm sorry to say that it appears multi instance support was never added. Christian's init script

Re: Problem with DNS lookup when chrooted

2011-08-10 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, August 10, 2011 05:16:50 PM Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 8/10/2011 3:07 PM, ricardus1867 wrote: > > I'm running Ubuntu 10.04 and I installed Postfix 2.8.4 from Christian > > Roessner's PPA. > > I just went through the Debian 6.x Postfix 2.7.1 init script, and I'm > sorry to say that it

Re: postfix with archiving and e-discovery

2011-08-10 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 2011-08-10 16:39, Donny Brooks wrote: Hello all, I have done some research on this but cannot find an easy to implement solution that doesn't need us to send our mail to an outside company. We need an in-house email archiving and e-discovery solution that would work with our existing

Re: postfix with archiving and e-discovery

2011-08-10 Thread Miles Fidelman
Jeroen Geilman wrote: On 2011-08-10 16:39, Donny Brooks wrote: Hello all, I have done some research on this but cannot find an easy to implement solution that doesn't need us to send our mail to an outside company. We need an in-house email archiving and e-discovery solution that would

Re: sender_bcc - patterns questions

2011-08-10 Thread Troy Piggins
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:47:37AM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote: > On 2011-08-10 09:20, Troy Piggins wrote: > >1. Could you please confirm that the pattern between the slashes is just the > >sender's address that we're trying to match? > > sender_bcc_maps matches the envelope sender address. > >

Re: sender_bcc - patterns questions

2011-08-10 Thread Troy Piggins
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:11:49AM +0200, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: > On 2011-08-10 Jeroen Geilman wrote: > > On 2011-08-10 09:20, Troy Piggins wrote: > > It is not a variable expansion. Use this instead: > > > > /(user1)@mydomain.com/ $1_s...@mydomain.com > > > > Read http://www.postfix.org/p