> > default_process_limit is set to what?
>
> We haven't set it, so I presume that means it's using the default of
> 100. I just checked, and we're using 44 of them.
For what? smtp? smtpd? pstree output can help - it shows lines like:
||-8*[smtp]
||-32*[smtpd]
> I'm g
On 27/07/2011 16:56, Roger Goh wrote:
> If users send mails to abc@postfix_pop3.com, I don't get
> this looping problem; it's only when they send mails to
> abc@exchange_pop3.com.
>
> Also, previously when POP3 was enabled on Exchange 2003
> server & "auto-forwarding" was not set up on the Exchan
Hi list,
does anybody have experienced data about the delivery rate of a single
postfix smtp server in the following scenario
- server is a Dell PowerEdge 2850
- 2x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU
- 4 GiB memory
- running a caching DNS resolver locally
- 75 MiBit/s backbone to the internet
Thanks,
Ma
On 07/27/11 17:41, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 27.07.2011 23:22, schrieb Wietse Venema:
>>
>> Is this machine running a webserver? Look in the access logs
>
> if this is the reason consider disable smtp on 127.0.0.1
> because most of dumb injected scripts are trying this instead
> the network
Am 28.07.2011 15:49, schrieb Michael Orlitzky:
> On 07/27/11 17:41, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 27.07.2011 23:22, schrieb Wietse Venema:
>>>
>>> Is this machine running a webserver? Look in the access logs
>>
>> if this is the reason consider disable smtp on 127.0.0.1
>> because most of dumb
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 03:42:59PM +0200, Martin Bley wrote:
> does anybody have experienced data about the delivery rate of a single
> postfix smtp server in the following scenario
Something between 2/s, if everything needs to go through a single
spamassassin process doing expensive tests, and 30
Zitat von Martin Bley :
Hi list,
does anybody have experienced data about the delivery rate of a single
postfix smtp server in the following scenario
- server is a Dell PowerEdge 2850
- 2x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU
- 4 GiB memory
- running a caching DNS resolver locally
- 75 MiBit/s backbone t
Hi Andreas,
sorry for the personal reply, here again as a List-Reply.
* lst_ho...@kwsoft.de am 28.07.11, 17:43:
> You have omitted some relevant facts:
>
> - The performance of the I/O system (bandwidth/latency)?
Hi Bastian,
* Bastian Blank am 28.07.11,
17:13:
> Please provide more information what you want to do.
sorry, please see my reply <20110729061552.GA3407@bvl-bsn004>
Thanks,
Martin
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
