Hello Wietse,
Am Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:08:34 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema schrieb:
> If the connection is not AF_INET or AF_INET6, Postfix pretends it
> is localhost[127.0.0.1].
thanks. This helps a lot!
I just had a quick scan over the docs and couldn't find this info.
Thanks
Lars
Zitat von Stan Hoeppner :
On 7/14/2011 6:58 AM, Peter Tselios wrote:
Hallo,
I need to prepare a presentation for my company because we plan
to deploy a new mail system. I need to know the names of some
medium to large ISPs that uses Postfix as their SMTP server. Do you
know where I ca
Peter Tselios wrote:
> Do you work for them? Because, the server does not report it's name :(
>
>
> T-Online in Hungary uses Postfix.
>
> $ host t-online.hu
> t-online.hu has address 84.2.36.211
> t-online.hu mail is handled
Hi folks :-)
This it my first post..
reading howto of postfix I understand how keep a copy of all email that
forward my postfix.
I've only one production server, I'd like keep copy (on this server) of
all emails.
carbon copy :-)
How can configure postfix to keep emails?
thanks!
Pol
PS: I use
Le 14/07/2011 13:21, Axel Braun a écrit :
> Am Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2011 schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter:
> What is the problem? How can I enable SSL additionally?
p@p:~$ grep smtps /etc/services
ssmtp 465/tcp smtps # SMTP over SSL
>>>
>>> Thanks. I added
On 15/7/2011 11:48 πμ, Pol Hallen wrote:
I've only one production server, I'd like keep copy (on this server) of
all emails.
carbon copy :-)
Use:
always_bcc = mailstore@localhost
See: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html
Nick
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Am 15.07.2011 11:02, schrieb mouss:
> STARTTLS is the standard. so clients are encouraged to use it, so that
> one day we will be able to get rid of the non standard smtps (whishful
> thinking?)
what is in case of 465 non-standard?
[root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ cat /etc/services | grep smtps
smtps 465
Le 15/07/2011 11:15, Reindl Harald a écrit :
>
>
> Am 15.07.2011 11:02, schrieb mouss:
>
>> STARTTLS is the standard. so clients are encouraged to use it, so that
>> one day we will be able to get rid of the non standard smtps (whishful
>> thinking?)
>
> what is in case of 465 non-standard?
>
Lars T?uber:
> Hello Wietse,
>
> Am Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:08:34 -0400 (EDT)
> Wietse Venema schrieb:
> > If the connection is not AF_INET or AF_INET6, Postfix pretends it
> > is localhost[127.0.0.1].
>
> thanks. This helps a lot!
> I just had a quick scan over the docs and couldn't find this info.
On 7/14/2011 5:55 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 7/14/2011 6:58 AM, Peter Tselios wrote:
>> Hallo,
>> I need to prepare a presentation for my company because we plan to
>> deploy a new mail system. I need to know the names of some medium to large
>> ISPs that uses Postfix as their SMTP server.
Stan Hoeppner:
> In this case it appears they've replaced the 500 5.5.2 unrecognized
> command error with with a custom message:
> 214 See http://www.messagelabs.com/support
> Some of the Synacor systems do this as well, while others have
> the standard Postfix return message.
Hello
I' searching for ( if exists ... ) a vacation utility that respond ONLY to
validated addresses ( those in a list for example ) to avoid the sending
of a "real" addresses to spambots .
Thanks for any infos
On 07/15/2011 05:38 PM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
I' searching for ( if exists ... ) a vacation utility that respond
ONLY to
validated addresses ( those in a list for example ) to avoid the sending
of a "real" addresses to spambots .
Thanks for any infos
Forget it ! I found the answer ju
2011/7/14 Peter Tselios :
> Hallo,
> I need to prepare a presentation for my company because we plan to
> deploy a new mail system. I need to know the names of some medium to large
> ISPs that uses Postfix as their SMTP server. Do you know where I can find
> that information?
> Thanks
> Peter
We are an ISP of about 60,000 customers, and in the past our systems were
setup to allow networks from mynetworks (a large number of IPs) as well as
a lookup table that allows users who have previously popped the server to
relay mail. We recently added SMTP Auth capability, and are seriously
consi
> To summarize, we think SMTP Auth is the simplest and most useful way to
> allow people to send mail through our outbound mail system, and we are
> hoping to get some feedback from the community regarding this
> perspective.
Yes and No. for 99% of our client base, we use SMTP auth. We have a coup
Hello,
I want to restrict postfix to only send mail to our domain, yet to no others.
In other words, I want to set it up to not send mail to any outside address and
only to accounts within our domain (anyuser@our_domain_only.com). This is a
test server and is not a mail server, per say. Postfix
On 15/07/11 22:25, James D. Parra wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to restrict postfix to only send mail to our domain, yet to no others.
> In other words, I want to set it up to not send mail to any outside address
> and only to accounts within our domain (anyuser@our_domain_only.com). This is
> a t
James D. Parra:
> Hello,
>
> I want to restrict postfix to only send mail to our domain, yet to no others.
> In other words, I want to set it up to not send mail to any outside address
> and only to accounts within our domain (anyuser@our_domain_only.com). This is
> a test server and is not a m
Erwan David:
> On 15/07/11 22:25, James D. Parra wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I want to restrict postfix to only send mail to our domain, yet to no
> > others. In other words, I want to set it up to not send mail to any outside
> > address and only to accounts within our domain
> > (anyuser@our_do
Wietse Venema:
> Erwan David:
> > On 15/07/11 22:25, James D. Parra wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I want to restrict postfix to only send mail to our domain, yet to no
> > > others. In other words, I want to set it up to not send mail to any
> > > outside address and only to accounts within ou
Am 15.07.2011 22:25, schrieb James D. Parra:
> Hello,
>
> I want to restrict postfix to only send mail to our domain, yet to no others.
> In other words, I want to set it up to not send mail to any outside address
> and only to accounts within our domain (anyuser@our_domain_only.com). This is
> Yup, that would do the trick.
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
default_transport = error:5.7.1 This destination is prohibited.
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
/etc/postfix/transport:
example.com smtp:
This avoids regular expressions, and also has the same limitation
of n
On 7/15/2011 8:46 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Stan Hoeppner:
>> In this case it appears they've replaced the 500 5.5.2 unrecognized
>> command error with with a custom message:
>> 214 See http://www.messagelabs.com/support
>> Some of the Synacor systems do this as well, while others
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Frank Bonnet
> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 10:08 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Large ISP which use Postfix
>
> Anyone knows what Google or Hotmail us
On 7/15/2011 3:15 PM, l...@airstreamcomm.net wrote:
> To summarize, we think SMTP Auth is the simplest and most useful way to
> allow people to send mail through our outbound mail system, and we are
> hoping to get some feedback from the community regarding this perspective.
If I understand your
On 7/15/2011 5:55 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
>> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Frank Bonnet
>> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 10:08 PM
>> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
>> Subject: Re: Large ISP which u
On 7/15/2011 6:01 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> A. Newer versions of eCelerity use a different MTA
> B. They changed the code to make the help message user configurable
C. Stan didn't read the return codes thoroughly enough.
I believe the correct answer is C. :(
--
Stan
> > MessageLabs do not respond with postfix-ish error messages.
I mentioned earlier that they reply with a distinct qmail-ish twang
when I send an unimplemented command:
220 server-6.tower-36.messagelabs.com ESMTP
foobar
502 unimplemented (#5.5.1)
No other MTA that I know of implements enhanced
29 matches
Mail list logo
