On 6/4/2011 6:25 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> My recommendation to the OP is to consider outsourcing this. It will
> not cost that much, and a reputable email service provider can be
> well worth what they charge.
>
> Conversely to do it inhouse I would recommend tearing it all down and
> starting o
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 05:52:53 -0500
Stan Hoeppner articulated:
> On 6/4/2011 6:25 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>
> > My recommendation to the OP is to consider outsourcing this. It
> > will not cost that much, and a reputable email service provider can
> > be well worth what they charge.
> >
> > Convers
Am 05.06.2011 14:30, schrieb Jerry:
> On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 05:52:53 -0500
> Stan Hoeppner articulated:
>> +1
>>
>> Outsource the sending of these shareholder notifications to a
>> reputable bulk mailer. Stating you are running an EOL OS and EOL
>> Postfix tells us you are not up to the task of s
/dev/rob0:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 01:09:28PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > postscreen_whitelist_interfaces matters only for clients that are
> > not yet whitelisted (or that have expired).
>
> Issue: previously whitelisted client gets WHITELIST VETO on secondary
Of course, being whitelisted
Stan Hoeppner:
> On 6/4/2011 6:25 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>
> > My recommendation to the OP is to consider outsourcing this. It will
> > not cost that much, and a reputable email service provider can be
> > well worth what they charge.
> >
> > Conversely to do it inhouse I would recommend tearing
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 09:21:21AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> /dev/rob0:
> > On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 01:09:28PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > postscreen_whitelist_interfaces matters only for clients that
> > > are not yet whitelisted (or that have expired).
> >
> > Issue: previously whitel
On 6/5/2011 8:36 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Stan Hoeppner:
>> On 6/4/2011 6:25 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>>
>>> My recommendation to the OP is to consider outsourcing this. It will
>>> not cost that much, and a reputable email service provider can be
>>> well worth what they charge.
>>>
>>> Conversely
/dev/rob0:
> Jun 5 01:50:46 cardinal postfix/postscreen[15628]: CONNECT from
> [174.37.3.121]:33695 to [216.23.247.74]:25
> Jun 5 01:50:52 cardinal postfix/postscreen[15628]: PASS OLD
> [174.37.3.121]:33695
> Jun 5 01:50:52 cardinal postfix/smtpd[15816]: connect from
> 174.37.3.121-static.rev
Hello all,
Since till now i was using postfix 2.5 i am planning to upgrade to 2.8
because i see 2 major feature multi -instance and postscreen can any one
give me with example of an ideal conguration .
Regards,
Kshitij
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> /dev/rob0:
> > Jun
Hello -
I am a new subscriber to this mail list and am in need of some help
configuring Postfix/Sendmail to work with the Apache James email server.
Don't get me wrong on this, Postfix is probably a fine MTA, but I have
some complex mailets designed which run under Apache James. ;-) Anywise,
in th
On 06/05/2011 04:54 PM, kshitij mali wrote:
Hello all,
HI!
Please:
1. DO NOT Top-post,
2. Reply to the LIST, and
3. DO NOT hijack threads for your own issues.
Thanks!
--
J.
Marc Chamberlin:
> Hello -
>
> I am a new subscriber to this mail list and am in need of some help
> configuring Postfix/Sendmail to work with the Apache James email server.
> Don't get me wrong on this, Postfix is probably a fine MTA, but I have
> some complex mailets designed which run under Apa
On 23/5/2011 9:26 πμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
With some googling I found this rather old message:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2004-03/2663.html where
Wietse suggested to increase the var_flock_tries undocumented
parameter in main.cf (from 20 to 40).
Would this suggestion be
Nikolaos Milas:
> On 23/5/2011 9:26 ??, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>
> > With some googling I found this rather old message:
> > http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2004-03/2663.html where
> > Wietse suggested to increase the var_flock_tries undocumented
> > parameter in main.cf (from 20
On 6/5/2011 9:36 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Marc Chamberlin:
>> Hello -
>>
>> I am a new subscriber to this mail list and am in need of some help
>> configuring Postfix/Sendmail to work with the Apache James email server.
>> Don't get me wrong on this, Postfix is probably a fine MTA, but I have
>>
On 06/06/2011 01:02 AM, Marc Chamberlin wrote:
Thanks Wietse for replying! From your reply, I think you are
interpreting my question as asking how Apache James can use
Postfix/Sendmail to process email for it. Actually, what I need is the
other way around, how to configure Postfix/Sendmail to r
On 06/06/2011 01:11 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 06/06/2011 01:02 AM, Marc Chamberlin wrote:
Thanks Wietse for replying! From your reply, I think you are
interpreting my question as asking how Apache James can use
Postfix/Sendmail to process email for it. Actually, what I need is the
other way
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 10:21:38AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> /dev/rob0:
> > Jun 5 01:50:46 cardinal postfix/postscreen[15628]: CONNECT from
> > [174.37.3.121]:33695 to [216.23.247.74]:25
> > Jun 5 01:50:52 cardinal postfix/postscreen[15628]: PASS OLD
> > [174.37.3.121]:33695
> > Jun 5 01:5
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 08:24:40PM +0530, kshitij mali wrote:
> Since till now i was using postfix 2.5 i am planning to upgrade to
> 2.8 because i see 2 major feature multi -instance and postscreen
> can any one give me with example of an ideal conguration .
2.8 is a very good idea. I can highly
19 matches
Mail list logo
