How can I increase mail sending speed in postfix
On 25/04/2011, at 7:16 PM, Johan Pappu wrote:
> How can I increase mail sending speed in postfix
Buy a fatter pipe? Get bigger iron? Ask a sensible question?
-- James
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
If you are not able to give the answer or don't know about postfix then do
not under estimate others or do not reply to mail.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:04 PM, James Gray wrote:
> On 25/04/2011, at 7:16 PM, Johan Pappu wrote:
>
> > How can I increase mail sending speed in postfix
>
> Buy a fatter
Dear James,
If you are not able to give the answer or don't know about postfix then do
not under estimate others or do not reply to mail.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Johan Pappu wrote:
> If you are not able to give the answer or don't know about postfix then do
> not under estimate others
On Monday, April 25, 2011 at 11:16 CEST,
Johan Pappu wrote:
> How can I increase mail sending speed in postfix
Find out where your bottleneck is and attack it.
I'm sorry, but it's impossible to give a more specific answer
without additional details. Usually Postfix performance is bound
by
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:09:49 +0530
Johan Pappu articulated:
> If you are not able to give the answer or don't know about postfix
> then do not under estimate others or do not reply to mail.
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:04 PM, James Gray wrote:
>
> > On 25/04/2011, at 7:16 PM, Johan Pappu wrot
Hello
I'm trying to get Postfix (DMZ) to relay only users listed in the
relay_recipients to an internal Exchange server and if not in file look
for a local account /etc/passwd then drop.
I can get it to try and forward with the main.cf below but it will not
look local if not in relay_recipients.
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 06:29:21PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 23.04.2011 07:56, schrieb Johan Pappu:
> > How can I send 10 mails using postfix in 5 minutes
>
> * take HIGHE AMOUNT of money in your hand
> * by some good hardware (disk I/O)
> * spread the hardware over some networks
> * s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dam...@isys.ca said the following on 25/04/11 13:31:
> I can get it to try and forward with the main.cf below but it will not
> look local if not in relay_recipients. I know it has to do with the
> local_recipient_maps but I can't seem to find out ho
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 06:50:36PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> snce we are speaking abount desnder-dependent %s is the sender
> %d would be the sender-domain, on other mysql-config places %s
> and %d stands for rcpt/rcpt-domain
No, in both cases '%s' is the lookup key and '%d' is its domain par
Am 25.04.2011 15:11, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 06:50:36PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> snce we are speaking abount desnder-dependent %s is the sender
>> %d would be the sender-domain, on other mysql-config places %s
>> and %d stands for rcpt/rcpt-domain
>
> No, in bo
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 03:16:42PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > No, in both cases '%s' is the lookup key and '%d' is its domain part, if
> > the lookup key is an address of the form localpart@domain. When '%d' or
> > '%u' is used in the query template, lookups with keys that are not of the
> >
Am 25.04.2011 15:28, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 03:16:42PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> sometimes it would be really useful to build a query
>> depending on sender AND rcpt whis is AFAIK not possible
>
> Not possible, because Postfix table driven mechanisms (virtual(5)
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 03:44:12PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > In all cases the table driven mechanisms just see a key/value table, and
> > don't know anything about the internal capabilities of the table driver.
> > In addition, tables don't know the semantics of the keys or values.
>
> you
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 07:31:09AM -0400, dam...@isys.ca wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm trying to get Postfix (DMZ) to relay only users listed in the
> relay_recipients to an internal Exchange server and if not in file look
> for a local account /etc/passwd then drop.
For a domain with some users local
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 02:59:27PM -0400, John Baker wrote:
> There are several ways to make this work right including virtual aliases
> but the cleanest way seemed to me to be a per user transport map lookups
> for cloud users.
I think that per-user transport lookups are unwise.
- Map eac
Le 25/04/2011 04:07, ben thielsen a écrit :
> given two lines in header_checks, both work when testing with postmap, but
> only one works when processing actual mail. it's my sense that it's related
> to the fact that the non working header check has to do with mail submitted
> via sendmail(1),
Hello,
One of our clients is trying to send us email and this is what I see in the
Logs:
# grep -i "u...@tld.com" /var/log/maillog | more
Apr 25 06:49:01 host postfix/smtpd[27269]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]: 554 5.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find your
hostname,
Am 25.04.2011 23:48, schrieb motty.cruz:
> Hello,
>
> One of our clients is trying to send us email and this is what I see in the
> Logs:
>
> # grep -i “u...@tld.com" /var/log/maillog | more
>
> Apr 25 06:49:01 host postfix/smtpd[27269]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> unknown[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 02:48:56PM -0700, motty.cruz wrote:
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
> reject_unauth_destination,
> reject_unknown_client, <-- unwise, and cause
>-- of the reported issue
> reject_
I ran into an issue with Postfix plus LDAP
where configuring the LDAP server to be '127.0.0.1'
works, but 'localhost' fails with an error.
I wanted to inquire if this was planned behavior
because it certainly confused me.
In detail:
Basic context:
OS: OpenBSD 4.8
Postfix: version: 2.7.1 (
John Dorian:
> actual mail fails, with what I thought was the most notable error being:
> "dict_ldap_debug: ldap_connect_to_host: getaddrinfo failed: no address
> associated with name"
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#no_chroot
Try turning off chroot operation in master.cf
A common mi
>John Dorian:
>> actual mail fails, with what I thought was the most notable error being:
>> "dict_ldap_debug: ldap_connect_to_host: getaddrinfo failed: no address
>> associated with name"
>Wietse Venema:
>http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#no_chroot
>
>Try turning off chroot operation i
Hello all,
Yes, this again. I promise it's slightly different this time.
I have users in LDAP and they're brought in as local users by
libnss-ldapd. With local_recipient_maps set to use a LDAP map instead of
unix:passwd.byname, smtpd correctly tempfails incoming mail when the
LDAP service is unav
24 matches
Mail list logo
