hi
we are having a full-featured server and some internal relays
for website-forms and such things with no restrictions
on the full-featured server is a existing mysql-view
"dbma_recipients" with all addresses we would accept
incoming mails including some "@domain.tld"
what would be the simplest
Am 17.04.2011 13:38, schrieb Reindl Harald:
> hi
>
> we are having a full-featured server and some internal relays
> for website-forms and such things with no restrictions
>
> on the full-featured server is a existing mysql-view
> "dbma_recipients" with all addresses we would accept
> incoming ma
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 17:18:04 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> why is "reject_unlisted_sender" before "permit_mynetworks" ignored?
>
> Apr 17 17:16:41 arrakis postfix/smtpd[31521]: B244136033:
> client=unknown[10.0.0.6]
> Apr 17 17:16:41 arrakis postfix/cleanup[31524]: B244136033:
> message-id=
>
Am 17.04.2011 17:34, schrieb Sahil Tandon:
> On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 17:18:04 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> why is "reject_unlisted_sender" before "permit_mynetworks" ignored?
>>
>> Apr 17 17:16:41 arrakis postfix/smtpd[31521]: B244136033:
>> client=unknown[10.0.0.6]
>> Apr 17 17:16:41 arrakis p
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 17:39:34 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 17.04.2011 17:34, schrieb Sahil Tandon:
> > On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 17:18:04 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >> why is "reject_unlisted_sender" before "permit_mynetworks" ignored?
> >>
> >> Apr 17 17:16:41 arrakis postfix/smtpd[31521
Am 17.04.2011 17:50, schrieb Sahil Tandon:
> On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 17:39:34 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> Am 17.04.2011 17:34, schrieb Sahil Tandon:
>>> On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 17:18:04 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
why is "reject_unlisted_sender" before "permit_mynetworks" ignored?
Am 17.04.2011 17:50, schrieb Sahil Tandon:
> On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 17:39:34 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> Am 17.04.2011 17:34, schrieb Sahil Tandon:
>>> On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 17:18:04 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
why is "reject_unlisted_sender" before "permit_mynetworks" ignored?
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 17:59:35 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> everybody on this machine should can use the machines ip-addr as
> >> smtp-relay but only with domains listed on our main-server
> >
> > You could use check_sender_access to enforce specific sender domains.
>
> this was one of my th
below my working configuration in the hope somebody saves time and energy
Am 17.04.2011 18:56, schrieb Sahil Tandon:
> On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 17:59:35 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> one of my guesses would be
>> query = select 'OK' from dbma_mta where mydestination='%d';
>
> To accomplish your
hello postfix guru
hello wieste
hello mouss
I would like to add anti-abuse headers. I just spent a good little time to
watch list archives and found no answers
example of a header that I want to appear in my mail
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any
Trying to complete initial setup of postfix.
My box is on a dynamic ip internet connection.
I have a FQDN and DNS forwarding service through no-ip.com.
I am starting with this one domain, and one virtual user.
Thus far, postfix is not receiving mail and when I try send email by
testing with "telne
Mike wrote:
tcpdump -i eth0 port 25 (demonstrating incoming mail from a gmail
account to the postfix box on eth0 -- provided "zeros" to the ip
address for security):
In your case, tcpdump output illuminates nothing about the problem.
And here's the /var/log/maillog on the slackware/postfix b
On 4/17/2011 6:28 PM, fakessh wrote:
hello postfix guru
hello wieste
hello mouss
I would like to add anti-abuse headers. I just spent a good little time to
watch list archives and found no answers
example of a header that I want to appear in my mail
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to tra
Sahil,
Thank you for your help.
I created the virtual_alias_maps and now receive the expected response
when initiating telnet session:
~:/var/spool# telnet localhost 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 localhost ESMTP Postfix
quit
221 2.0.0 Bye
Connection
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 10:01 PM, masegaloeh wrote:
> Your problem was similiar to problem that i found in this link
> http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0608/1215.html
>
> The solution is "Try turning off chroot operation in master.cf"
> http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#no_chroot
> --
>
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 11:00 PM, masegaloeh wrote:
> On 4/18/2011 8:28 AM, Mike wrote:
>>
>> I manually created the /var/spool/example.com/user1/ directories.
>> I also applied directory ownership to: vmail:vmail
>
> why you create directory in /var/spool/example.com but your mailbox_base is
> /
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Mike <1100...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ~# ls -la /var/spool/vmailbox
> total 12
> drwxr-xr-x 3 1001 vmail 4096 2011-04-17 12:19 ./
> drwxr-xr-x 17 root root 4096 2011-04-17 12:03 ../
> drwxr-xr-x 3 1001 vmail 4096 2011-04-17 13:39 example.com/
>
chown'ed everything
Le lundi 18 avril 2011 03:27, Noel Jones a écrit :
> On 4/17/2011 6:28 PM, fakessh wrote:
> > hello postfix guru
> > hello wieste
> > hello mouss
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I would like to add anti-abuse headers. I just spent a good little time
> > to watch list archives and found no answers
> >
> > examp
18 matches
Mail list logo
