Am 08.04.2011 18:31, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Randy Ramsdell:
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Randy Ramsdell:
Apr 8 10:10:30 atlbl6 postfix/qmgr[11959]: warning: connect to transport
private/retry: Connection refused
grep retry /etc/postfix/master.cf
what do you see?
# grep
Hello
The reason behind to apply smtpd_client_restriction is to control the
spammers, now what is happening spammers (even those doesn't belongs to our
network) are configuring our fake email address of our domain and sending
spam emails to the internet which causing our. server black list i
Good morning List.
Is it possible to rate limit based on individual network ranges?
We have multiple network ranges (3G, DSL& leased line) and I would like
to setup a different sending rate limit for the individual networks.
For example, is it possible limit the 3G network to 300 mails per da
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 12:46:03AM +1000, Voytek Eymont wrote:
> Apr 10 00:37:13 palm postfix/smtp[12024]: setting up TLS connection to
> gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[7
> 4.125.127.27]:25
>
> Apr 10 00:37:13 palm postfix/smtp[12024]: certificate verification failed
> for gmail-smtp-in.l.googl
> e.c
Zitat von "pf at alt-ctrl-del.org" :
Has anyone implemented or experimented with selectively greylisting
specific networks, with a long delay? Let's say 4 hours...
If so, what are your results?
Background:
1. Greylisting seems to have lost much of its value, and I stopped
using it about a y
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 11:44:12PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 4/8/2011 11:29 PM, email builder wrote:
>>
>> Or is this of no concern and/or does the junk command limit take care of
>> it?
>
> If you have no use for ETRN just set
> smtpd_etrn_restrictions = reject
> or maybe better
> smtpd_etrn
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 11:09:00PM -0700, email builder wrote:
> I'm wondering about the usefulness of smtp(d)_tls_CAfile(path) when using
> opportunistic encryption in both incoming and outgoing connections. The
> TLS_README suggests that certificate and key files be left empty for
> opportuni
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 04:07:57PM +1000, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
> I'm migrating virtual mail domain/users to new Postfix server,
> new server setup and working, I'm altering MX to point to the new server;
>
> I want the 'old' server to forward any new traffic over to the new server,
> last time
On 11/04/2011 10:09, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
> Good morning List.
>
> Is it possible to rate limit based on individual network ranges?
try http://postfwd.org/
--
Simone Caruso
IT Consultant
On 4/11/2011 1:08 AM, mejaz wrote:
Hello,
Many thanks for your feedback it works for me after replacing
“hash” with “cidr” but after that whenever I was trying to
send emails to outside domains it says relay access denied
although the trusted IPs are listed in my network file.
Please help
Ejaz
Hi folks,
what is the best solution for discarding email to be sended/trasnfered
to all recipients when there is one concrete addres in to, cc bcc
fields.
i need that for functional testing of our e-shop, where we testing in
production environment. And we don't want to spam our clients with
"orde
Hello all!
I'm looking at logs of my postfix-2.6.6 and wonder how postfix chooses
which MX it'll connect.
There is some "cool" configured domain simplusnet.pl:
simplusnet.pl.300INSOAplusmx1.polkomtel.com.pl.
postmaster.plusgsm.pl. 2010122205 28800 7200 1209600 86400
simp
On 4/10/2011 11:55 PM, Nasser Heidari wrote:
Anyone has any idea ?
Thanks for Your answer, Here is my postconf -n output:
Please don't top-post.
Please show us "postconf -n" output and non-comment entries
from master.cf, along with logging demonstrating the problem.
-- Noel Jones
HI all ,
Which the best lookup for postfix databases from the following one :
mysql
ldap
hash-db
cdb
I want to migrate from qmail to postfix which would be having 1378 email
account
Regards,
Kshitij
On 4/11/2011 7:05 AM, Jiri Vitek wrote:
Hi folks,
what is the best solution for discarding email to be sended/trasnfered
to all recipients when there is one concrete addres in to, cc bcc
fields.
i need that for functional testing of our e-shop, where we testing in
production environment. And we
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 02:06:51PM +0200, Administrator Systemu wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I'm looking at logs of my postfix-2.6.6 and wonder how postfix chooses
> which MX it'll connect.
Random DNS order, as perturbed by demand-caching of sessions. Log parsers
should look at lines without "conn_u
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 07:07:49AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 4/10/2011 11:55 PM, Nasser Heidari wrote:
>> Anyone has any idea ?
>>
>> Thanks for Your answer, Here is my postconf -n output:
>>
>>
>
> Please don't top-post.
>
> Please show us "postconf -n" output and non-comment entries from mas
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 05:39:09PM +0530, kshitij mali wrote:
> HI all ,
>
> Which the best lookup for postfix databases from the following one :
>
> mysql
> ldap
> hash-db
> cdb
Use cdb when you want simple read-only, indexed files.
Use btree for Postfix dynamic caches (TLS session cache, verif
W dniu 11.04.2011 14:14, Victor Duchovni pisze:
Mail deliveries will try mx1, but if that tempfails, mx2 or perhaps
mx3 may be tried in turn.
mx1& mx3 resolve to the same IP address, and permanently refuses
connections to smtp port.
Works only mx2. And now going back to logs:
Apr 11 00:15:27
Administrator Systemu:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> W dniu 11.04.2011 14:14, Victor Duchovni pisze:
> > Mail deliveries will try mx1, but if that tempfails, mx2 or perhaps
> > mx3 may be tried in turn.
> >> mx1& mx3 resolve to the same IP address, and permanently refuses
>
Thanks a lot Jones.
I am using /etc/postfix/mynetworks where I can list "trusted" network
addresses (IPADDRESS) is it?
Postconf -n output
bounce_queue_lifetime = 1d
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
de
Hello,
I've got border MTA (postfix + antispam) and MDA (postfix + dovecot) where
emails are delivered to. Users on MDA are limited by dovecot-based quota.
How can I pass information about "this user's quota is reached, do not
receive email for him and reject it with relevant 5xx message" to the b
On 9 apr 2011, at 18:54, Nasser Heidari wrote:
> We have an Exchange for our local Emails and Exchange uses Postfix as
> Smarthost.
> Address Rewriting is Working properly for Emails from Exchange to
> Outside network, but For Emails from Exchange to Postfix Virtually
> hosted Domains or Postfix
Hello there,
We have been facing this problem for few weeks and could not find the right
solution yet... One of our customers' system is experiencing a persistent email
delivery delay (either for local or oustide recipients) and after making
multiple changes to postfix settings, we keep on hav
Zozime Rakotondrazafy:
> Hello there,
>
>
> We have been facing this problem for few weeks and could not find
> the right solution yet... One of our customers' system is experiencing
> a persistent email delivery delay (either for local or oustide
> recipients) and after making multiple changes t
Wietse Venema wrote:
Randy Ramsdell:
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
* Randy Ramsdell :
Apr 8 10:10:30 atlbl6 postfix/qmgr[11959]: warning: connect to transport
private/retry: Connection refused
grep retry /etc/postfix/master.cf
what do you see?
# grep retry /etc/postfix/mas
Hi,
>> Apr 11 03:32:07 alex postfix/smtpd[2278]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
>> ut-tul-1.tul.getthere.net[151.193.164.249]: 450 4.1.8
>> : Sender address rejected: Domain not
>> found; from= to=
>> proto=ESMTP helo=
>>
>> Would adding "st...@wl0.tul.getthere.net OK" to my sender_access map
>> perm
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:02:47AM -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
> Argh, I ran postfix upgrade-configuration but not set-permissions. When I
> do add the set-permissions argument, there is an error for README_FILES.
>
> postfix upgrade-configuration set-permissions
> chown: cannot access `/usr/sha
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:18:34AM -0400, Alex wrote:
> > Sounds as if the mail is being rejected by reject_unknown_sender_domain.
> > ?Your check_sender_access whitelist needs to be before
> > ?reject_unknown_sender_domain in the same smtpd_*_restrictions section.
>
> Okay, I've even put the sen
On 4/11/2011 7:37 AM, Ejaz wrote:
Thanks a lot Jones.
I am using /etc/postfix/mynetworks where I can list "trusted"
network addresses (IPADDRESS) is it?
*_Postconf –n output_*
bounce_queue_lifetime = 1d
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon_directory = /usr/li
that work like a charm.
Thank you Noel
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 07:14 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 4/11/2011 7:05 AM, Jiri Vitek wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > what is the best solution for discarding email to be sended/trasnfered
> > to all recipients when there is one concrete addres in to, cc bcc
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:02:47AM -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Argh, I ran postfix upgrade-configuration but not set-permissions. When I
do add the set-permissions argument, there is an error for README_FILES.
postfix upgrade-configuration set-permissions
chown: cannot
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:54:57AM -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
> Now I am on dict_mysql.so. So I stalled postfix-mysql, now exiting for
> pqsql.
>
> Is there a way to edit a configuration so the program skips certain
> features?
No, you need to fix all the problems. It seems that Postfix you a
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:54:57AM -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Now I am on dict_mysql.so. So I stalled postfix-mysql, now exiting for
pqsql.
Is there a way to edit a configuration so the program skips certain
features?
No, you need to fix all the problems. It seems
Hello,
in my mail.log I have lines where the message-id is not encircled with
'<' and '>'. This has broke my parsing scripts.
It seems that it only happens in the cleanup process. The messages-id
hadn't domain portions.
In about one month, I had seen two examples of this problem. I will
s
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 05:17:22PM +0200, Javier Amor Garcia wrote:
> Hello,
> in my mail.log I have lines where the message-id is not encircled with '<'
> and '>'. This has broke my parsing scripts.
>
> It seems that it only happens in the cleanup process. The messages-id
> hadn't domain porti
Zitat von Victor Duchovni :
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 05:17:22PM +0200, Javier Amor Garcia wrote:
Hello,
in my mail.log I have lines where the message-id is not encircled with '<'
and '>'. This has broke my parsing scripts.
It seems that it only happens in the cleanup process. The messages-id
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 05:34:46PM +0200, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
>> Postfix logs the content of the message-id header. Some messages are
>> more equal than others.
>
> So it is a case of "shit in, shit out"??
Postfix logs the content of the Message-Id header as received. To
determine whether
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:54:57AM -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Now I am on dict_mysql.so. So I stalled postfix-mysql, now exiting
for pqsql.
Is there a way to edit a configuration so the program skips certain
features?
No, you need to fix all
On Friday, April 8, 2011, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> email builder put forth on 4/8/2011 10:14 PM:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm thinking about trying the example suggested in the documentation for
>> "sleep":
>>
>>
>> /etc/postfix/main.cf:
>> smtpd_client_restrictions =
>> sleep 1, reject_unauth_pipeli
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:49:00AM -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
> Okay every single man page, and there are MANY, is also causing an error.
> This are all related to opensuse's postfix-docs rpm which does not create
> sym links to the gzipped page.
If they change the names of the installed file
Hello Daniel
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 22:19 -0400, "Daniel Bromberg"
wrote:
> It's not that there's a magic formula, but ideally you just want to
> apply the principle of Least Privilege and reason it out from there.
That was a good explanation. I had been thinking that since PostFix is
designed to
Javier Amor Garcia:
> mail.log.2:41222:Mar 24 12:49:45 kif postfix/cleanup[808]: EFA813D790:
> message-id=468a9c3f8b21b9d8fe7af2181f4ddd99
>
> This is a bug?
The system that created the Message-ID header does not comply
with the Internet email RFCs (RFC 5322 in this case).
If you were expecting
Hi,
I've been trying to follow http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html and
trying to get it working, but I keep getting relay access denied. As far
as I know, SASL AUTH works (I've tested). Can you help me? Below is my
postconf -n output and relevant log.
postconf -n:
command_directory = /u
Tolga:
> mail.log:
> [snip]
> Apr 11 16:25:39 216235 postfix/smtpd[24241]: connect from
> unknown[193.255.135.1]
> Apr 11 16:25:40 216235 postfix/smtpd[24241]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> unknown[193.255.135.1]: 554 5.7.1 : Relay
> access denied; from=
> to= proto=ESMTP helo=
> Apr 11 16:25:42
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:49:00AM -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Okay every single man page, and there are MANY, is also causing an error.
This are all related to opensuse's postfix-docs rpm which does not create
sym links to the gzipped page.
If they change the names o
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:43:38PM -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
> Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:49:00AM -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
>>> Okay every single man page, and there are MANY, is also causing an error.
>>> This are all related to opensuse's postfix-docs rpm which d
Hello again.
I got postscreen working with content filtering and passing good mail
through. I'm able to receive and send mail, and headers all look like
it seems they should. It's good to feel some progress even if just first
steps.
I learned that we really should have both a primary and a backu
On 4/11/2011 11:30 AM, Tolga wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to follow
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html and trying to get it
working, but I keep getting relay access denied. As far as I
know, SASL AUTH works (I've tested). Can you help me? Below is
my postconf -n output and relevant log.
pos
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:43:38PM -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:49:00AM -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
Okay every single man page, and there are MANY, is also causing an error.
This are all related to opensuse's postfix-do
First, you can't run multiple postscreen daemons with the same
postscreen_cache_map setting, as that will corrupt the database.
I'm adding a check for this.
Second, to make postscreen listen on more than once address, list
all addresses in main.cf:
inet_interfaces = 1.2.3.4 1.2.3.5 127.0.0.1
On 04/11/11 12:49, jeremy.als...@imap-mail.com wrote:
>
> I learned that we really should have both a primary and a backup MX
> assigned, and that they should be different IPs.
>
I'm going question this wisdom with the hope that it might save you some
pain. Why would it be better to have two MXe
Hello Wietse
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:16 -0400, "Wietse Venema"
wrote:
> First, you can't run multiple postscreen daemons with the same
> postscreen_cache_map setting, as that will corrupt the database.
> I'm adding a check for this.
>
> Second, to make postscreen listen on more than once address,
jeremy.als...@imap-mail.com:
> How do I do that and get different greetings on each IP it listens on?
You do not need different banners on different IP addresses
when you implement the following:
MAIL EXCHANGER POLICY TESTS
When a remote SMTP client is not on the permanent access
Hi Michael
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:41 -0400, "Michael Orlitzky"
wrote:
> On 04/11/11 12:49, jeremy.als...@imap-mail.com wrote:
> >
> > I learned that we really should have both a primary and a backup MX
> > assigned, and that they should be different IPs.
> >
>
> I'm going question this wisdom
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:02 -0400, "Wietse Venema"
wrote:
> If the above required different banners on different IP addresses,
> then surely I would have mentioned this.
>
> If the above required TWO postscreen daemons running on the same
> host, then surely I would have mentioned this.
>
> I cou
On 04/11/11 14:02, jeremy.als...@imap-mail.com wrote:
> Hi Michael
>
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:41 -0400, "Michael Orlitzky"
> wrote:
>> On 04/11/11 12:49, jeremy.als...@imap-mail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> I learned that we really should have both a primary and a backup MX
>>> assigned, and that they shou
jeremy.als...@imap-mail.com:
>
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:02 -0400, "Wietse Venema"
> wrote:
> > If the above required different banners on different IP addresses,
> > then surely I would have mentioned this.
> >
> > If the above required TWO postscreen daemons running on the same
> > host, then s
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 01:04:46PM -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
[..]
> What is the "postfix-files" that list say postmap.1 vs.
If you take a peek at postfix.1 you will see a section FILES. There
you can find the files referenced in this man page, including the
postfix-files:
$daemon_directory/
Dennis Guhl wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 01:04:46PM -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
[..]
What is the "postfix-files" that list say postmap.1 vs.
If you take a peek at postfix.1 you will see a section FILES. There
you can find the files referenced in this man page, including the
postfix-files:
On Monday, April 11, 2011, 14:02:37, jeremy.als...@imap-mail.com wrote:
> ...
> There's no wisdom here, just what I've been told -- use a minimum of 2.
> All of the examples that I see have at least two MX records.
> One of the fellas at the user group who told us about PostFix wast
> talking abo
On 04/11/11 15:29, Rod Dorman wrote:
> On Monday, April 11, 2011, 14:02:37, jeremy.als...@imap-mail.com wrote:
>> ...
>> There's no wisdom here, just what I've been told -- use a minimum of 2.
>> All of the examples that I see have at least two MX records.
>> One of the fellas at the user group w
11-04-2011 19:41, Wietse Venema yazmış:
Tolga:
mail.log:
[snip]
Apr 11 16:25:39 216235 postfix/smtpd[24241]: connect from
unknown[193.255.135.1]
Apr 11 16:25:40 216235 postfix/smtpd[24241]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[193.255.135.1]: 554 5.7.1: Relay
access denied; from=
to= proto=ESMT
11-04-2011 19:59, Noel Jones yazmış:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_unauth_destination
It worked, thanks a lot Noel :)
Regards,
Tolga
Thanks for the answer. Things are clearer now.
message-id=468a9c3f8b21b9d8fe7af2181f4ddd99
This is a bug?
Postfix logs the content of the message-id header. Some messages are
more equal than others.
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 23:14:10 +0300
> Von: Tolga
> An: Postfix users
> Betreff: Re: SASL
>
>
> 11-04-2011 19:41, Wietse Venema yazmış:
> > Tolga:
> >> mail.log:
> >> [snip]
> >> Apr 11 16:25:39 216235 postfix/smtpd[24241]: connect from
> >> unknown[193
pf at alt-ctrl-del.org put forth on 4/10/2011 10:33 PM:
> My thought on auto combating this is to use a CIDR list to kick these
> networks (and only these networks) over to a greylist policy that delays
> these emails for 4+ hours. By then, most of the bad IPs would be listed
> in one or more RBL
Hi
Probably not the best place for this, but hopefully someone will tell me what
I'm doing wrong anyway..
I've gotten the TLS up and working. And SASL auth seemed to be working. I
installed saslfinger and everything was fine there. But when trying to locally
inject mail on the submission po
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:43:09 -0500
Stan Hoeppner articulated:
> pf at alt-ctrl-del.org put forth on 4/10/2011 10:33 PM:
>
> > My thought on auto combating this is to use a CIDR list to kick
> > these networks (and only these networks) over to a greylist policy
> > that delays these emails for 4+
Hello,
I've recently been getting spam that has the first received header filled in
with multiple users. This is an example.
Received: from 79.14.233.16 (account ,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
Hello,
using postfix 2.8.2 under Solaris 10 with
postscreen_cache_map = dbm:$data_directory/verify_cache
it appears that cache cleanup logging gives erratic numbers of retained entries,
ranging between 1875 and as high as 727916:
Apr 3 11:32:25 postfix/postscreen[760]: [ID 197553 mail.info] c
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:39:43 -0400
Jerry wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:43:09 -0500
> Stan Hoeppner articulated:
>
> > pf at alt-ctrl-del.org put forth on 4/10/2011 10:33 PM:
> >
> > > My thought on auto combating this is to use a CIDR list to kick
> > > these networks (and only these network
Jerry put forth on 4/11/2011 4:39 PM:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:43:09 -0500
> Stan Hoeppner articulated:
>
>> pf at alt-ctrl-del.org put forth on 4/10/2011 10:33 PM:
>>
>>> My thought on auto combating this is to use a CIDR list to kick
>>> these networks (and only these networks) over to a greyli
Jose Hales-Garcia put forth on 4/11/2011 4:47 PM:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've recently been getting spam that has the first received header filled in
> with multiple users. This is an example.
>
> Received: from 79.14.233.16 (account ,
> ,
>HELO domain)
> by domain (CommuniGate P
Stan Hoeppner:
> Have you heard of a case of an SMTP sender suing an SMTP receiver for
> message rejection, and winning the case?
http://www.spamhaus.org/organization/statement.lasso?ref=3
They sued, and the US judge awarded them US$11.7 million for damages.
Wietse
Peter Schultze:
> Hello,
>
> using postfix 2.8.2 under Solaris 10 with
> postscreen_cache_map = dbm:$data_directory/verify_cache
>
> it appears that cache cleanup logging gives erratic numbers of retained
> entries,
> ranging between 1875 and as high as 727916:
>
> Apr 3 11:32:25 postfix/post
On 4/11/2011 7:07 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stan Hoeppner:
Have you heard of a case of an SMTP sender suing an SMTP receiver for
message rejection, and winning the case?
http://www.spamhaus.org/organization/statement.lasso?ref=3
They sued, and the US judge awarded them US$11.7 million for damag
Wietse Venema put forth on 4/11/2011 6:07 PM:
> Stan Hoeppner:
>> Have you heard of a case of an SMTP sender suing an SMTP receiver for
>> message rejection, and winning the case?
>
> http://www.spamhaus.org/organization/statement.lasso?ref=3
>
> They sued, and the US judge awarded them US$11.7 m
"Stan Hoeppner" Monday, April 11, 2011 4:43 PM
pf at alt-ctrl-del.org put forth on 4/10/2011 10:33 PM:
My thought on auto combating this is to use a CIDR list to kick these
networks (and only these networks) over to a greylist policy that delays
these emails for 4+ hours. By then, most of the b
On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:44 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> My first idea for handling these messages is writing a filter in
>> header_checks using regexp. Is this the best approach to take using Postfix
>> 2.4.3?
>
> Probably not. Provide the full header and we may be able to give you
> better opt
mynetworks isn't listed here.
Thank you so much for you help.
Sorry may some lines were not copied properly in my previous Email. Here is
the ouput of postconf -n and you will find mynetworks in second last line.
bounce_queue_lifetime = 1d
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /et
I'm running Postfix 2.8.1 and Cyrus 2.3.16 on an Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid)
server.
I'm having trouble with incoming mail from Google's Postini help forum.
The messages I'm getting contain null characters in the body, so Cyrus
is saying "554 5.6.0 Message contains NUL characters (in reply to end
of DATA
Jose Hales-Garcia put forth on 4/11/2011 8:00 PM:
>
> On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:44 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>>> My first idea for handling these messages is writing a filter in
>>> header_checks using regexp. Is this the best approach to take using
>>> Postfix 2.4.3?
>>
>> Probably not. Provide
83 matches
Mail list logo
