What are the right users & groups to use for spampd & clamav when used with PostFix?

2011-04-10 Thread jeremy . alsten
Hello. I'm plugging along on content filtering for Postfix. I decided to have PostFix use 'spampd', the Spamassassin Proxy Daemon, instead of 'spamd', and to set up ClamAV as a SpamAssassin plugin. I read that it's pretty easy to open up some nasty holes in your security if you get users & permi

Re: What are the right users & groups to use for spampd & clamav when used with PostFix?

2011-04-10 Thread Daniel Bromberg
On 4/10/2011 8:33 PM, jeremy.als...@imap-mail.com wrote: Hello. I'm plugging along on content filtering for Postfix. I decided to have PostFix use 'spampd', the Spamassassin Proxy Daemon, instead of 'spamd', and to set up ClamAV as a SpamAssassin plugin. I read that it's pretty easy to open up

selective greylisting with a long delay

2011-04-10 Thread pf at alt-ctrl-del.org
Has anyone implemented or experimented with selectively greylisting specific networks, with a long delay? Let's say 4 hours... If so, what are your results? Background: 1. Greylisting seems to have lost much of its value, and I stopped using it about a year ago. 2. By using and monitoring the l

Sender access issue

2011-04-10 Thread Alex
Hi, I've read the access man page and help pages at postfix.org, but I still don't understand. I think I may be trying to use check_sender_access in a way in which it wasn't intended. I have the following message: Apr 11 03:32:07 alex postfix/smtpd[2278]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from ut-tul-1.tul.g

Re: Sender access issue

2011-04-10 Thread Daniel Bromberg
On 4/10/2011 11:38 PM, Alex wrote: Hi, I've read the access man page and help pages at postfix.org, but I still don't understand. I think I may be trying to use check_sender_access in a way in which it wasn't intended. I have the following message: Apr 11 03:32:07 alex postfix/smtpd[2278]: NOQU

Re: Sender access issue

2011-04-10 Thread Noel Jones
On 4/10/2011 10:38 PM, Alex wrote: Hi, I've read the access man page and help pages at postfix.org, but I still don't understand. I think I may be trying to use check_sender_access in a way in which it wasn't intended. I have the following message: Apr 11 03:32:07 alex postfix/smtpd[2278]: NOQU

RE: Address Rewrite Problem

2011-04-10 Thread Nasser Heidari
Anyone has any idea ? Thanks for Your answer, Here is my postconf -n output: --- postconf -n : alias_database = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases anvil_rate_time_unit = 1m anvil_status_update_time = 5m append_at_myorigin = yes append_dot_mydomain = yes b

migrating to new server ?

2011-04-10 Thread lists
I'm migrating virtual mail domain/users to new Postfix server, new server setup and working, I'm altering MX to point to the new server; I want the 'old' server to forward any new traffic over to the new server, last time what I used was static entry in main.cf like: transport_maps = static:smtp:

RE: smptd_client_restriction

2011-04-10 Thread mejaz
Hello, Many thanks for your feedback it works for me after replacing "hash" with "cidr" but after that whenever I was trying to send emails to outside domains it says relay access denied although the trusted IPs are listed in my network file. Please help Ejaz -Original M