Hello,
"Victor Duchovni" wrote:
> > 1. How to get SSL certificate of smtp.iol.cz
> > (and save it to
> > > file).
>
> Use "openssl s_client -showcerts"
Thanks - it works. Interesting is, that I get this way only 2
certificates:
CN=smtp.iol.cz (issuer CN=Thawte SSL CA) and
CN=Thawte SSL CA
Hello,
I have try it - see bellow,
but without removing also from PBL it fail, while
Peter Evans s server use zen.spamhouse.org which
includes also PBL list (dynamic address check).
LOG:
Mar 9 11:09:07 duron650 postfix/smtp[2873]: B316BA2A79:
to=, relay=mail.ixp.jp[222.147.76.196]:25, delay=
Hi,
I recently read about the trick by Wietse, defining a second DNS record
to skip the 450 delay that follows some postscreen tests. I modified my
DNS and it looks like this now:
host -t mx roessner-network-solutions.com
roessner-network-solutions.com mail is handled by 10
mx0.roessner-net.de.
r
Non-authoritative answer:
108.234.71.85.in-addr.arpa name = 108.234.broadband4.iol.cz.
[85.71.234.108] blocked using zen.spamhaus.org
sorry but what is your problem?
you can not use your home-machine as mailserver and
nothing will change this, so what is new in your
message after this long
mouss put forth on 3/8/2011 5:03 PM:
> [WARNING: Steven CC'd]
>
> things. so I'd say, do not consider performances as a primary target. go
> for catching spammers first. only tune after you get the irght rules,
> and only if needed (I personally don't tune anything here. I'm happy to
> focus on c
Am 09.03.2011 10:14, schrieb kapetr:
> Hello,
>
>
> "Victor Duchovni" wrote:
>>> 1. How to get SSL certificate of smtp.iol.cz
>>> (and save it to
file).
>>
>> Use "openssl s_client -showcerts"
>
> Thanks - it works. Interesting is, that I get this way only 2
> certificates:
>
> CN=smtp.
Hello,
RTFM, please.
The Postfix SASL_README file says:
Communication between the Postfix SMTP server and Dovecot
SASL happens via a UNIX-domain socket.
Support for inet: is NOT DOCUMENTED. It may disappear any time.
There is no promise nowhere that this actually works.
You use NOT DOCUMENTE
Randy Ramsdell put forth on 3/8/2011 3:57 PM:
> Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> FYI, the PBL isn't limited to dynamic listings. Many corporations add
>> their unused IP space to the PBL, along with other IPs within their
>> netblocks that shouldn't be sending direct mail. They do this as part
>> of a mu
Steve put forth on 3/8/2011 5:12 PM:
> Maybe using if/endif conditions like Stan Hoeppner has done on his pcre map
> could speedup things even more? -> http://www.hardwarefreak.com/fqrdns.pcre
You're giving me too much credit. ;) Again, I'm not the original author
of that table. That person cr
Dennis Guhl put forth on 3/8/2011 6:41 PM:
>> Dorothy, you're not in Kansas anymore.
>
> What does this saying mean?
It's a para-quote from the 1939 American movie "The Wizard of Oz".
Dorothy, a young girl living in farm house in Kansas, is swept away by a
powerful tornado. When the house lands
Hi guys
I need to configure my server to relay domains to and antispam server but by
different hosts. I was looking and now I have doubts.In my configuration Im
using two variables, relayhost and mydestination. I need to change it and I
found to use transport_maps but I don't view examples to unde
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 05:39:07AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Dennis Guhl put forth on 3/8/2011 6:41 PM:
>
> >> Dorothy, you're not in Kansas anymore.
> >
> > What does this saying mean?
>
> It's a para-quote from the 1939 American movie "The Wizard of Oz".
> Dorothy, a young girl living in f
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 08:30 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 01:38:28PM +0100, Raven wrote:
>
> > I would like to implement server-to-server TLS encryption between two
> > postfix instances I manage. One of the servers already has
> > TLS-capabilities but they are only used
On 3/9/2011 4:29 AM, Christian Roessner wrote:
Hi,
I recently read about the trick by Wietse, defining a second DNS record
to skip the 450 delay that follows some postscreen tests. I modified my
DNS and it looks like this now:
host -t mx roessner-network-solutions.com
roessner-network-solutions
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 12:57:26 +
Mauro wrote:
> I my logs I have:
>
>
> Feb 13 06:27:57 mail1-xen postfix/qmgr[8336]: BF683A28247:
> from=<..>
>
> That number BF683A28247 is a unique number?
Yes and no.
It is unique in a timespan.
If you use logrotate(8) it is probably unique for
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Randy Ramsdell put forth on 3/8/2011 3:57 PM:
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
FYI, the PBL isn't limited to dynamic listings. Many corporations add
their unused IP space to the PBL, along with other IPs within their
netblocks that shouldn't be sending direct mail. They do this as
Am 09.03.2011 13:57, schrieb Mauro:
> I my logs I have:
>
>
> Feb 13 06:27:57 mail1-xen postfix/qmgr[8336]: BF683A28247:
> from=<..>
> That number BF683A28247 is a unique number?
yes for this messages
with "cat /var/log/maillog | grep BF683A28247"you get all lines
from this messag
On 3/9/2011 6:57 AM, Mauro wrote:
I my logs I have:
Feb 13 06:27:57 mail1-xen postfix/qmgr[8336]: BF683A28247: from=<..>
That number BF683A28247 is a unique number?
The postfix queueid identifies a single message while it's in
the queue. The queueid is created from the queue fi
Hello,
I know that full messages can be added in any failed DSN but I would like to
configure DSN to add in all cases the original message.
Could you tell me if this functionality could be added in futures releases ?
Thanks for your help !
Thanks Wietse,
In order to run multiple postfix instances on a single host,
I read in the http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html that we need to
upgrade the Postfix to 2.6 and preferably to 2.7.3
This would take us some time to evaluate, so maybe the simplest thing is to
clone the m
Just my 2c:
Here:
http://stevejenkins.com/blog/2011/01/building-postfix-2-8-on-rhel5-centos-5-from-source/
you can find directions to build Postfix from source, fully-compatible
with CentOS Postfix packages.
The above process should be identical in RHEL 5.
I have found that building/upgradin
moildard moildard:
> Hello,
>
> I know that full messages can be added in any failed DSN but I would like to
> configure DSN to add in all cases the original message.
Postfix NEVER sends full originals when:
a) The sender specified RET=HDRS (return headers only). See RFC
3461 for details abou
On 3/9/2011 6:29 AM, deconya wrote:
Hi guys
I need to configure my server to relay domains to and antispam
server but by different hosts. I was looking and now I have
doubts.In my configuration Im using two variables, relayhost
and mydestination. I need to change it and I found to use
transport_
On 9 March 2011 14:04, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 3/9/2011 6:57 AM, Mauro wrote:
>>
>> I my logs I have:
>>
>>
>> Feb 13 06:27:57 mail1-xen postfix/qmgr[8336]: BF683A28247:
>> from=<..>
>>
>> That number BF683A28247 is a unique number?
>
> The postfix queueid identifies a single message wh
* Mauro :
> On 9 March 2011 14:04, Noel Jones wrote:
> > On 3/9/2011 6:57 AM, Mauro wrote:
> >>
> >> I my logs I have:
> >>
> >>
> >> Feb 13 06:27:57 mail1-xen postfix/qmgr[8336]: BF683A28247:
> >> from=<..>
> >>
> >> That number BF683A28247 is a unique number?
> >
> > The postfix queu
> > Has the second-MX solution any advantages? Should I stay on the current
> > setup?
>
> Your current setup looks fine.
thanks for explaining the different aspects :)
Christian
--
Roessner-Network-Solutions
Bachelor of Science Informatik
Nahrungsberg 81, 35390 Gießen
F: +49 641 5879091, M: +4
On 9 March 2011 15:46, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * Mauro :
>> On 9 March 2011 14:04, Noel Jones wrote:
>> > On 3/9/2011 6:57 AM, Mauro wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I my logs I have:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Feb 13 06:27:57 mail1-xen postfix/qmgr[8336]: BF683A28247:
>> >> from=<..>
>> >>
>> >> That
[root@mail:~]$ cat maillog | grep -i sasl | grep reindl | tail -n 2
Mar 9 15:00:22 mail postfix/smtpd[7582]: 0BA7FE9:
client=rh.thelounge.net[10.0.0.99], sasl_method=PLAIN,
sasl_username=h.rei...@thelounge.net
Mar 9 16:23:45 mail postfix/smtpd[8877]: 614CEE8:
client=rh.thelounge.net[10.0.0.99],
On 9 March 2011 16:19, Reindl Harald wrote:
> [root@mail:~]$ cat maillog | grep -i sasl | grep reindl | tail -n 2
> Mar 9 15:00:22 mail postfix/smtpd[7582]: 0BA7FE9:
> client=rh.thelounge.net[10.0.0.99], sasl_method=PLAIN,
> sasl_username=h.rei...@thelounge.net
> Mar 9 16:23:45 mail postfix/smt
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 02:22:15PM +, Katzir, Igal wrote:
> Thanks Wietse,
>
> In order to run multiple postfix instances on a single host,
> I read in the http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html that we need
> to upgrade the Postfix to 2.6 and preferably to 2.7.3
You can run mul
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 01:36:46PM +0100, Raven wrote:
> How can I apply this to $relayhost without having to list all local
> domains in the transport map (as they are already listed in
> $virtual_mailbox_domains)?
Why are you using virtual_mailbox_domains for addresses that are relayed
to anoth
On 3/9/2011 10:26 AM, Mauro wrote:
On 9 March 2011 16:19, Reindl Harald wrote:
[root@mail:~]$ cat maillog | grep -i sasl | grep reindl | tail -n 2
Mar 9 15:00:22 mail postfix/smtpd[7582]: 0BA7FE9:
client=rh.thelounge.net[10.0.0.99], sasl_method=PLAIN,
sasl_username=h.rei...@thelounge.net
Mar
Noel Jones:
> On 3/9/2011 10:26 AM, Mauro wrote:
> > On 9 March 2011 16:19, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> [root@mail:~]$ cat maillog | grep -i sasl | grep reindl | tail -n 2
> >> Mar 9 15:00:22 mail postfix/smtpd[7582]: 0BA7FE9:
> >> client=rh.thelounge.net[10.0.0.99], sasl_method=PLAIN,
> >> sasl_u
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 01:17:38PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Correct. With current Postfix implementations, there are two "marker"
> records that you can use:
>
> - The "postfix/qmgr removed" record that says the file is deleted.
> This record was introduced with Postfix version 2.1.
>
Victor Duchovni:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 01:17:38PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Correct. With current Postfix implementations, there are two "marker"
> > records that you can use:
> >
> > - The "postfix/qmgr removed" record that says the file is deleted.
> > This record was introdu
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 01:56:50PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Perhaps it is time to replace the time-in-microseconds portion of
> the queue ID by a sufficient number of random bits.
I would not replace the microsecond time, its monotonicity has useful
properties.
Rather, we could augment the
For what it's worth, sendmail's implementation encodes the current time down to
the second plus the pid of the handling process in its queue IDs. A collision
then could only happen if the same pid got re-used twice in the same second.
It doesn't include the inode or any random data.
Details:
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Victor Duchovni
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 2:02 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Message is modified after after-queue filter
>
> > My current work-ar
Murray S. Kucherawy:
> For what it's worth, sendmail's implementation encodes the current
> time down to the second plus the pid of the handling process in
> its queue IDs. A collision then could only happen if the same
> pid got re-used twice in the same second. It doesn't include the
> inode or
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 04:05:18PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Postfix uses the inode number in the name, because the name needs
> to be unique across the incoming, active, and deferred directories.
>
> Postfix could lengthen the time before reuse, by including more
> time information (four hex
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 04:05:18PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Postfix uses the inode number in the name, because the name needs
to be unique across the incoming, active, and deferred directories.
Postfix could lengthen the time before reuse, by including more
time infor
Sorry if this is a silly question, but I'm something of a Postfix (and
mail servers in general) newbie.
My Postfix server is all working fine, and is happily acting as a
relay for my local network.
However, I'm having problems when a user tries to send a single, large
message to a large numb
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 09:40:26PM +, Tim wrote:
> What happens is that Postfix receives the message from the sender, queues
> it, then immediately connects to *all* of the destination servers
> simultaneously and starts sending the message to them. This completely
> saturates the upstream
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 09:40:26PM +, Tim wrote:
What happens is that Postfix receives the message from the sender, queues
it, then immediately connects to *all* of the destination servers
simultaneously and starts sending the message to them. This completely
satura
Victor Duchovni:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 04:05:18PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Postfix uses the inode number in the name, because the name needs
> > to be unique across the incoming, active, and deferred directories.
> >
> > Postfix could lengthen the time before reuse, by including more
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 10:21:44PM +, Tim wrote:
> Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 09:40:26PM +, Tim wrote:
>>> What happens is that Postfix receives the message from the sender, queues
>>> it, then immediately connects to *all* of the destination servers
>>> simultaneo
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 10:21:44PM +, Tim wrote:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 09:40:26PM +, Tim wrote:
What happens is that Postfix receives the message from the sender, queues
it, then immediately connects to *all* of the destination servers
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Tim wrote:
>
> What happens is that Postfix receives the message from the sender, queues
> it, then immediately connects to *all* of the destination servers
> simultaneously and starts sending the message to them. This completely
> saturates the upstream Internet li
Seeing a problem with inbound delivery from relays. Incoming client
connections are timing out, but I'm able to telnet to port 25 on my host
and immediately get the 220 banner every time. Sometimes the connection
times out before the 220 banner is displayed, sometimes it doesn't and
the client neve
On 03/10/2011 01:00 AM, Adam N. Copeland wrote:
Seeing a problem with inbound delivery from relays. Incoming client
connections are timing out, but I'm able to telnet to port 25 on my host
and immediately get the 220 banner every time. Sometimes the connection
times out before the 220 banner is d
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 08:36:36PM -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
> Fix the problem on the right way, use traffic control. Example to
> outgoing email 1Mbit limit.
That won't help with the timing out deliveries. There will still be very
slow deliveries across many connections and they may wel
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 01:14:48AM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>> Mar 9 18:38:03 pmx4 postfix/smtpd[13358]: [ID 197553 mail.info] connect
>> from unknown[134.53.6.74]
>>
> okay
>
>> Mar 9 18:41:03 pmx4 postfix/smtpd[13243]: [ID 197553 mail.info]>
>> unknown[134.53.6.74]: 421 4.4.2 smtp-in.m
On 03/10/2011 01:56 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 01:14:48AM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Mar 9 18:38:03 pmx4 postfix/smtpd[13358]: [ID 197553 mail.info] connect
from unknown[134.53.6.74]
okay
Mar 9 18:41:03 pmx4 postfix/smtpd[13243]: [ID 197553 mail
HI All ,
My self kshitij and i am using postfix MTA for mailing service around
1.5 year EXP.
I want to built an new coustome queue same as like HOLD queue .
currrent sinerio is like i donot want any mail to be rejected as per
my mangement instruction
all the filter i applied on the smtpd_*_restr
54 matches
Mail list logo
