Aggelos put forth on 2/2/2011 10:49 PM:
> on 02/03/2011 05:24 AM Aggelos wrote the following:
>
>> With that setup, if I wanted to accept mail from a specific Internet IP,
>> which would otherwise be filtered out, how would I do it?
>>
>
> I meant clients that are rejected like so:
> Feb 3 06:46
> Dominik Schulz:
>> I'm currently planning to migrate an Exim mailserver to Postfix due to
>> performance issues and security concerns.
>>
>> The Exim mailserver is configured to handle several virtual domains. If
>> a
>> recipient is not found in the virtual table, before rejecting this
>> recipi
> l...@ds.gauner.org:
>> I've configured recipient_bcc_maps to capture outgoing mail to some
domains to debug delivery issues, i.e. some senders can't send mails to
yahoo and yahoo wants the full body. So I thought I could just capture
these mails using recipient_bcc_maps and later forward them to
on 02/03/2011 10:05 AM Stan Hoeppner wrote the following:
> Aggelos put forth on 2/2/2011 10:49 PM:
>> on 02/03/2011 05:24 AM Aggelos wrote the following:
>>
>>> With that setup, if I wanted to accept mail from a specific Internet IP,
>>> which would otherwise be filtered out, how would I do it?
>>
Hello
I'm migrating my mailhub.
on the fly I'm converting the mailboxes format from MBOX to Maildir
and I wonder how to use the vacation program ( or equivalent ) with
Maiidir format ?
Thanks for any infos , links ... etc.
Am 03.02.2011 10:24, schrieb Frank Bonnet:
Hello
I'm migrating my mailhub.
on the fly I'm converting the mailboxes format from MBOX to Maildir
and I wonder how to use the vacation program ( or equivalent ) with
Maiidir format ?
Thanks for any infos , links ... etc.
Hi
take a look at dovec
On 02/02/2011 11:54 PM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> In the mean time, maybe give this a go. 1600+ expressions matching rDNS
>> patterns of many millions of broadband IPs worldwide that shouldn't be
>> sending
>> direct SMTP. Catches quite a bit
On 02/03/2011 10:36 AM, Daniel Bromberg wrote:
> The following spam got past all my filters. They're constantly
> evolving :-(
>
> I can't find the IP in any RBLs. Some meta-RBLs claim it's listed, but
> when I follow up to the actual RBL, it's clean. I use zen.spamhaus &
> spamcop. SpamAssassin wa
On 2/3/2011 4:44 AM, J4K wrote:
[snip]
I can attest to the awesomeness of Stan's pcre file. I run it on all 5
of our Postfix servers, and it catches a LOT of stuff. From my logs,
what it seems to do best is block zombie mailers on dynamic IPs.
And I updated to your latest version today, Stan. T
On 02/03/2011 10:56 AM, Daniel Bromberg wrote:
> On 2/3/2011 4:44 AM, J4K wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> I can attest to the awesomeness of Stan's pcre file. I run it on all 5
>>> of our Postfix servers, and it catches a LOT of stuff. From my logs,
>>> what it seems to do best is block zombie mailers on dyna
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 18:44:46 -0600
Stan Hoeppner articulated:
> Jeroen Geilman put forth on 2/2/2011 2:56 PM:
>
> > Debian won't have 2.8 in stable until at least 2013, although you
> > may be able to get it as a backport later this year:
> >
> > http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=postf
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 10:44:13 +0100
J4K wrote:
> On 02/02/2011 11:54 PM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Stan Hoeppner
> > wrote:
> >> In the mean time, maybe give this a go. 1600+ expressions matching rDNS
> >> patterns of many millions of broadband IPs worldwide that
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 04:36:26 -0500, Daniel Bromberg
wrote:
> Those who can block this, how did you do it? I hope whatever
> technique(s) also help block many more like it.
Blocked here with bogofilter (bayesian header+body filter).
M.
On 2/3/2011 3:34 AM, Aggelos wrote:
> on 02/03/2011 10:05 AM Stan Hoeppner wrote the following:
>> Aggelos put forth on 2/2/2011 10:49 PM:
>>> on 02/03/2011 05:24 AM Aggelos wrote the following:
>>>
With that setup, if I wanted to accept mail from a specific Internet IP,
which would other
Hi,
I have a server which accepts eMails for multiple Domains.
And I wanna provide for each Domain a SSL certificate.
How can I use SNI (Server Name Indication) with postfix or is there
another way to solve this problem?
Regards,
alokat
Hello
Just few words to say how postscreen is great !
Thanks for that !!!
Alokat:
> Hi,
>
> I have a server which accepts eMails for multiple Domains.
> And I wanna provide for each Domain a SSL certificate.
>
> How can I use SNI (Server Name Indication) with postfix or is there
> another way to solve this problem?
This is not yet implemented in Postfix. One option i
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 09:16:27AM +0100, l...@ds.gauner.org wrote:
> I've tried Victor's suggestion using check_recipient_access backend by a
> longish MySQL query and empty relay_recipient_maps, but I'm still unsure
> wheter this'd be the best solution.
Using an access map instead of "relay_rec
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:30:33AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Alokat:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a server which accepts eMails for multiple Domains.
> > And I wanna provide for each Domain a SSL certificate.
> >
> > How can I use SNI (Server Name Indication) with postfix or is there
> > another
On 02/03/2011 05:03 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:30:33AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Alokat:
Hi,
I have a server which accepts eMails for multiple Domains.
And I wanna provide for each Domain a SSL certificate.
How can I use SNI (Server Name Indication) with postfix
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 05:16:58PM +0100, Alokat wrote:
>> For MUAs reaching a submission server, the picture is much more simple,
>> so this is perhaps viable, but which MUAs are SNI enabled?
>
> Okay ... thanks for all your comments.
> So how would you solve my problem? Multiple Instances?
Idea
Am 03.02.2011 17:16, schrieb Alokat:
> Okay ... thanks for all your comments.
> So how would you solve my problem? Multiple Instances?
>
> Regards,
> Alokat
* One Servername
* One Certificate
I see really no reason why not "mail.yourcompany.tld" using in all
MX-records and client-configs, nobod
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:44 AM, J4K wrote:
> Its a good idea, but this would limit a user from using a server on his
> residential ADSL from being an Email server, and force them to use their
> ISPs relay. Else they might have to upgrade to a business package or spend
> more money for a static IP
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:31:07PM +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> Just few words to say how postscreen is great !
>
> Thanks for that !!!
Indeed, but I'd like to add some content to this thread and ask the
list as a whole:
1. What are you using for dnsbl sites and threshold?
2. Have you enabled d
on 02/03/2011 04:13 PM Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote the following:
> On 2/3/2011 3:34 AM, Aggelos wrote:
>> on 02/03/2011 10:05 AM Stan Hoeppner wrote the following:
>>> Aggelos put forth on 2/2/2011 10:49 PM:
on 02/03/2011 05:24 AM Aggelos wrote the following:
> With that setup,
On 03.02.2011 00:27, wrote Matt:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Matt wrote:
>>> I'm working on replacing an ageing Posfix install with a new server.
>>>
>>> On the old and new server we use virtual domains.
>>>
>>> On the old server we
On 2/3/2011 11:53 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:31:07PM +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Just few words to say how postscreen is great !
Thanks for that !!!
Indeed, but I'd like to add some content to this thread and ask the
list as a whole:
1. What are you using for dnsbl sites
On 2/3/11 9:18 AM, l...@ds.gauner.org wrote:
l...@ds.gauner.org:
I've configured recipient_bcc_maps to capture outgoing mail to some
domains to debug delivery issues, i.e. some senders can't send mails to
yahoo and yahoo wants the full body. So I thought I could just capture
these mails using r
Did anyone have tips to integrate PostScreen with SenderBase DNSBL has
the Cisco IronMail blacklist ?
Bestr regards
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 08:16:58 -0800, Alokat wrote:
On 02/03/2011 05:03 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:30:33AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Alokat:
Hi,
I have a server which accepts eMails for multiple Domains.
And I wanna provide for each Domain a SSL certificate.
How
Am 03.02.2011 20:05, schrieb Chris Tandiono:
> You can get a multi-domain SSL certificate. It is one certificate that lists
> all the
> domains for which it is valid.
in theory xes
but this is not scaleable
If you get 3 new customers with their own domains you cert
does not include them and
Hi,
I have been reading about prioritizing mail in Postfix on this list. It seems
that the answer is, there is a shared queue and mail is not prioritized. I
want to make sure that I fully understand if this applies to my situation.
All of our servers that send mail go through our Postfix gate
On 02/03/2011 11:24 AM, James R. Marcus wrote:
Hi,
I have been reading about prioritizing mail in Postfix on this list. It seems
that the answer is, there is a shared queue and mail is not prioritized. I
want to make sure that I fully understand if this applies to my situation.
All of our s
On 2/3/2011 11:53 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:31:07PM +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Just few words to say how postscreen is great !
The only drawback, which is minor from our point of view, but maybe
major for the DNSBL operators, is that every connection means a hit
on every
* David Touzeau :
> Did anyone have tips to integrate PostScreen with SenderBase DNSBL has
> the Cisco IronMail blacklist ?
Please rephrase and please do mention how one would query the
SenderBase DNSBL!
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedi
On 2/2/11 12:20 AM, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Postfix logs the ID whenever one is available, and it did in your case.
> I'm wondering what exactly you seem to be missing. If it's about the
> client connection as logged by postfix/smtpd, then it has no connection
> to individual messages, hence does
Am 03.02.2011 20:41, schrieb Alan Batie:
> On 2/2/11 12:20 AM, Matthias Andree wrote:
>
>> Postfix logs the ID whenever one is available, and it did in your case.
>> I'm wondering what exactly you seem to be missing. If it's about the
>> client connection as logged by postfix/smtpd, then it has
Matt Rude:
> On 2/3/2011 11:53 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:31:07PM +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> >> Just few words to say how postscreen is great !
> >
> > The only drawback, which is minor from our point of view, but maybe
> > major for the DNSBL operators, is that every con
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:52:47 -0600, Noel Jones
wrote:
> list.dnswl.org*-5
this includes dnswl_none just a note
> hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com=127.0.0.1*-5
super that its is supported, still missing rhsbl in postscreen ?
Benny Pedersen:
> On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:52:47 -0600, Noel Jones
> wrote:
> > list.dnswl.org*-5
>
> this includes dnswl_none just a note
>
> > hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com=127.0.0.1*-5
>
> super that its is supported, still missing rhsbl in postscreen ?
There is not yet a us
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:01:56PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Benny Pedersen:
> > super that its is supported, still missing rhsbl in postscreen ?
>
> There is not yet a user interface design for rhsbl in postscreen.
> Suggestions are welcome.
I don't see how it would be useful. The only thing
/dev/rob0:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:01:56PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Benny Pedersen:
> > > super that its is supported, still missing rhsbl in postscreen ?
> >
> > There is not yet a user interface design for rhsbl in postscreen.
> > Suggestions are welcome.
>
> I don't see how it woul
Sorry, I rephrase
How can we set PostScreen to query SenderBase DNBSL ?
Best regards
Le jeudi 03 février 2011 à 20:37 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt a écrit :
> * David Touzeau :
>
> > Did anyone have tips to integrate PostScreen with SenderBase DNSBL has
> > the Cisco IronMail blacklist ?
>
> Pleas
On 2/3/11 8:31 PM, Joe wrote:
On 02/03/2011 11:24 AM, James R. Marcus wrote:
Hi,
I have been reading about prioritizing mail in Postfix on this list.
It seems that the answer is, there is a shared queue and mail is not
prioritized. I want to make sure that I fully understand if this
applie
On 2/4/11 12:33 AM, David Touzeau wrote:
Sorry, I rephrase
How can we set PostScreen to query SenderBase DNBSL ?
Best regards
Le jeudi 03 février 2011 à 20:37 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt a écrit :
* David Touzeaumailto:da...@touzeau.eu>>:
> Did anyone have tips to integrate PostScreen with Send
On 2/3/11 1:44 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Jeroen Geilman put forth on 2/2/2011 2:56 PM:
Debian won't have 2.8 in stable until at least 2013, although you may be able to
get it as a backport later this year:
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=postfix
They lag behind something awful.
You
On 02/03/2011 03:51 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 2/3/11 8:31 PM, Joe wrote:
On 02/03/2011 11:24 AM, James R. Marcus wrote:
Hi,
I have been reading about prioritizing mail in Postfix on this
list. It seems that the answer is, there is a shared queue and
mail is not prioritized. I want to ma
On 2/3/2011 1:59 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:52:47 -0600, Noel Jones
wrote:
list.dnswl.org*-5
this includes dnswl_none just a note
I intentionally don't want to RBL block sometimes-legit hosts.
To only whitelist low..high trusted hosts, something like:
l
Jeroen Geilman:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> On 2/3/11 8:31 PM, Joe wrote:
> > On 02/03/2011 11:24 AM, James R. Marcus wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I have been reading about prioritizing mail in Postfix on this list.
> >> It seems that the answer is, there is a shared queue and mail is n
On 2/4/11 1:25 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jeroen Geilman:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
Oops... Bad Thunderbird.
On 2/3/11 8:31 PM, Joe wrote:
On 02/03/2011 11:24 AM, James R. Marcus wrote:
Hi,
I have been reading about prioritizing mail in Postfix on this list.
It seems that t
Jeroen Geilman:
> >>> One huge improvement you can make is to specify the "relay" transport
> >>> for incoming mail.
> >> To achieve what ?
> > Postfix has separate "smtp" and "relay" transports for a good
> > reason.
> >
> > The scheduler uses round-robin destination selection.
>
> Does this mean
On 2/4/11 3:38 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jeroen Geilman:
One huge improvement you can make is to specify the "relay" transport
for incoming mail.
To achieve what ?
Postfix has separate "smtp" and "relay" transports for a good
reason.
The scheduler uses round-robin destination selection.
Does
Daniel Bromberg put forth on 2/3/2011 3:36 AM:
> The following spam got past all my filters. They're constantly evolving :-(
>
> I can't find the IP in any RBLs. Some meta-RBLs claim it's listed, but when I
> follow up to the actual RBL, it's clean. I use zen.spamhaus & spamcop.
> SpamAssassin was
J4K put forth on 2/3/2011 3:44 AM:
> Its a good idea, but this would limit a user from using a server on his
> residential ADSL from being an Email server,
As the directions in the file itself state, fix situations like this with a
simple whitelist. Given the number of hobbyist servers your MX w
J4K put forth on 2/3/2011 4:09 AM:
> True. Some of the matches don't reject, but prepend this header:
> X-GenericStaticHELO
> What is this header used for?
This exists due to the grey area between "residential" and "business"
classification. Some providers offer static IP service to small busi
Jerry put forth on 2/3/2011 5:19 AM:
> FreeBSD had the 2.8 release in its ports system a few days after it was
> officially released. The 2.9(beta) release will be released into the
> ports system shortly. The original 2.8(beta) was available almost
> from its inception. The speed with which a pac
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 12:51:36AM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>> That will create a separate queue from the outgoing mail which is using
>> the "smtp" transport,
>
> There is one queue.
Physically, yes. Logically, and this is what matters more: no. Each
transport has a separate pool of delive
Steve Jenkins put forth on 2/3/2011 11:18 AM:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:44 AM, J4K wrote:
>> Its a good idea, but this would limit a user from using a server on his
>> residential ADSL from being an Email server, and force them to use their
>> ISPs relay. Else they might have to upgrade to a bus
Jeroen Geilman put forth on 2/3/2011 5:55 PM:
> If it uses the common query method, just add it to your list of DNSBLs.
from: http://spamlinks.net/filter-dnsbl-lists.htm
query.senderbase.orgSENDERBASE ... Returns TXT records
Not suitable for direct Postfix use.
I manually dug a fe
Le 03/02/2011 10:24, Frank Bonnet a écrit :
> Hello
>
> I'm migrating my mailhub.
>
> on the fly I'm converting the mailboxes format from MBOX to Maildir
> and I wonder how to use the vacation program ( or equivalent ) with
> Maiidir format ?
>
vacation has nothing to do with the storage.
> Th
Le 02/02/2011 21:25, Noel Jones a écrit :
> On 2/2/2011 1:48 PM, mouss wrote:
>> Le 02/02/2011 19:28, Steve Jenkins a écrit :
>>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>>> permit_sasl_authenticated,
>>> permit_mynetworks,
>>> reject_unauth_destination,
>>> check_client_
61 matches
Mail list logo
