Am 16.12.2010 13:14, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Markus Sch?pflin:
So is it possible to get postfix to do the SMPT line length limit handling
(split long lines and insert CR LF) for this kind of setup?
Perhaps surprisingly, Postfix enforces the SMTP line length limit
only delivery via SMTP.
Not r
Hi,
we don't have procmail or maildrop. just postfix.I wannt abort forwarding
mail it's subject contains Spam think.
thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/.Forward-file-piping-forwarded-mail-%28abort-sendmail%29-tp30470508p30479046.html
Sent from the Postfix mailing li
On 2010-12-17 Boštjan Müller wrote:
> I have a problem with aliases, and would like to make it work.
> I have the following situation I have two servers one postfix v 2.0.18
> and on the other (new one) v 2.6.5.
> The problem is that I have migrated some users to the new server and
> set up transp
Markus Sch?pflin:
> Am 16.12.2010 13:14, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> > Markus Sch?pflin:
> >> So is it possible to get postfix to do the SMPT line length limit handling
> >> (split long lines and insert CR LF) for this kind of setup?
> >
> > Perhaps surprisingly, Postfix enforces the SMTP line length
Bo?tjan M?ller:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with aliases, and would like to make it work.
> I have the following situation I have two servers one postfix v 2.0.18
> and on the other (new one) v 2.6.5.
> The problem is that I have migrated some users to the new server and set
> up transport maps f
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:07:33 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema articulated:
> This is a mis-diagnosis. The variable in question is a boolean
> type, and there is no way that Postfix can resuse an SMTP connection
> while sender-dependent SASL authentication is turned on.
I assume that the PATCH as well a
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 07:24:24AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:07:33 -0500 (EST)
> Wietse Venema articulated:
>
> > This is a mis-diagnosis. The variable in question is a boolean
> > type, and there is no way that Postfix can resuse an SMTP connection
> > while sender-dependent
Victor Duchovni escribió:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 02:42:00PM +, Roger Dura?ona Vargas wrote:
>
>> I have set up sasl and a saslpass file with the first account:
>> smtp.correo.yahoo.es u...@yahoo.es:pass
>
> This is wrong. The lookup key needs to be the sender address, and
> you need to ena
hi all
can i use '&' character in the local part of the email address ?
thanks
-bharathan
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 02:44:35PM +0200, K bharathan wrote:
> can i use '&' character in the local part of the email address ?
Yes, but don't, such an address will run in a variety of interoperability
issues.
--
Viktor.
On 12/17/2010 01:17 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Bo?tjan M?ller:
Hi,
I have a problem with aliases, and would like to make it work.
I have the following situation I have two servers one postfix v 2.0.18
and on the other (new one) v 2.6.5.
The problem is that I have migrated some users to the new se
Bo?tjan M?ller:
> On 12/17/2010 01:17 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Bo?tjan M?ller:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have a problem with aliases, and would like to make it work.
> >> I have the following situation I have two servers one postfix v 2.0.18
> >> and on the other (new one) v 2.6.5.
> >> The problem
On 12/17/2010 02:51 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Bo?tjan M?ller:
On 12/17/2010 01:17 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Bo?tjan M?ller:
Hi,
I have a problem with aliases, and would like to make it work.
I have the following situation I have two servers one postfix v 2.0.18
and on the other (new one) v 2.6.
Bo?tjan M?ller:
> what about using an entry in full email adress form in /etc/aliases?
Wietse:
> As documented, the left-hand side must not have a domain.
Bo?tjan M?ller:
> No, not on the left side, left side is named a single word that only
> contains letters like the following example:
>
> my
Am 17.12.2010 13:16, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Markus Sch�pflin:
Am 16.12.2010 13:14, schrieb Wietse Venema:
[...]
OTOH I'm still wondering whether this is something the cleanup daemon
should be able to do? Opinions?
Yes. SMTP protocol issues should be dealt with in the SMTP client
and serve
Markus Sch??pflin:
> Am 17.12.2010 13:16, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> > Markus Sch?pflin:
> >> Am 16.12.2010 13:14, schrieb Wietse Venema:
>
> [...]
>
> >> OTOH I'm still wondering whether this is something the cleanup daemon
> >> should be able to do? Opinions?
> >
> > Yes. SMTP protocol issues sh
On 12/17/2010 03:19 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
[...]
If there is any indication that the program does not behave according
to the documentation, please describe the symptoms in a manner that
allows the problem to be reproduced (i.e. configuration + logging).
Wietse
The problem is, if I w
Bo?tjan M?ller:
> On 12/17/2010 03:19 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > [...]
> > If there is any indication that the program does not behave according
> > to the documentation, please describe the symptoms in a manner that
> > allows the problem to be reproduced (i.e. configuration + logging).
> >
> >
Am 17.12.2010 15:44, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Markus Schöpflin:
Am 17.12.2010 13:16, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Markus Sch?pflin:
Am 16.12.2010 13:14, schrieb Wietse Venema:
[...]
OTOH I'm still wondering whether this is something the cleanup daemon
should be able to do? Opinions?
Yes. SMTP p
Markus Sch?pflin:
> Am 17.12.2010 15:44, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> > Markus Sch_pflin:
> >> Am 17.12.2010 13:16, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> >>> Markus Sch?pflin:
> Am 16.12.2010 13:14, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> OTOH I'm still wondering whether this is something the cleanu
So I finally got around to getting a web server stood up on VMware so
that I can implement 'webmail' for my mail server. I'm using Postfix
2.7.1-2 and my servers are configured as follows:
mail = 192.168.0.200 /
web = 192.168.0.201 /
Now when my webmail service on the web server tries to send mai
On 12/17/2010 3:02 PM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
So I finally got around to getting a web server stood up on VMware so
that I can implement 'webmail' for my mail server. I'm using Postfix
2.7.1-2 and my servers are configured as follows:
mail = 192.168.0.200 /
web = 192.168.0.201 /
Now when my webm
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List
wrote:
> This really sounds like a DNS issue on the *client side*.
> One possible solution is to add "mail.domain.tld" to /etc/hosts so your
> clients points to 192.168.0.200.
I adjusted the entries in /etc/hosts so now I see the followi
sum changes is main.postfix file
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 192.168.0.201 192.168.0.200
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List
> wrote:
> > This really sounds like a DNS issue on the *client side*.
> > One possible so
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Ravindra Gupta // Viva
wrote:
>
>
> sum changes is main.postfix file
> mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 192.168.0.201 192.168.0.200
In my '/etc/postfix/mynetworks' file I have the following:
127.0.0.0/8
192.168.0.0/24
In my '/etc/postfix/main.cf' file I have:
[r...@mai
On 12/17/2010 4:13 PM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Ravindra Gupta // Viva
wrote:
sum changes is main.postfix file
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 192.168.0.201 192.168.0.200
In my '/etc/postfix/mynetworks' file I have the following:
127.0.0.0/8
192.168.0.0/24
In my '/et
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List
wrote:
> We do not need verbose logs unless you were asked for them.
Nobody asked for them but I assumed they could shed some light on the
issue. My apologies for the inconvenience.
Hi there,
I am using a script to process each incoming message into Postfix.
In master.cf, I have something like this. The python script calls
another Java program do the heavy-lifting message processing.
connector unix - n n - - pipe
flags= user=hubdire
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 04:47:41PM -0500, Zhou, Yan wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am using a script to process each incoming message into Postfix.
>
> In master.cf, I have something like this. The python script calls
> another Java program do the heavy-lifting message processing.
>
> connector
On 12/17/10 10:47 PM, Zhou, Yan wrote:
I added code in the
heavy-lifting Java program to send a message back to SMTP server. I got
an error:"you must issue STARTTLS first".
You apparently configured postfix to require encryption on mail submission.
I have no idea why Postfix asks for tha
Zhou, Yan:
> Hi there,
>
> I am using a script to process each incoming message into Postfix.
>
> In master.cf, I have something like this. The python script calls
> another Java program do the heavy-lifting message processing.
>
> connector unix - n n - -
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 05:28:27PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> And whatever you send back, NEVER NEVER NEVER USE the address in
> the FROM and TO message header. Instead, use the envelope sender,
> which are supplied with the pipe(8) ${sender} and ${recipient}
> macros. Again, if you respond to
32 matches
Mail list logo
