Ansgar Wiechers skrev 2010-11-24 18:11:
On 2010-11-24 Patric Falinder wrote:
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de skrev 2010-11-24 11:08:
Be sure to limit the usage of the list to the affected account and maybe
even to bounce sender addresses as a lot of legitim hosts are listed.
See http://www.backscatterer.or
Hello,
I've used the following Slackware build script to create a Slackware
13.1 Postfix 2.7.1 package:
http://pastebin.com/cfDZJGXf
When I use the same script to build a 2.7.2 package, I get this error
when I try to start Postfix:
postsuper: fatal: scan_dir_push: open directory defer: Permissi
On 2010-11-25 Patric Falinder wrote:
> Ansgar Wiechers skrev 2010-11-24 18:11:
>> On 2010-11-24 Patric Falinder wrote:
>>> lst_ho...@kwsoft.de skrev 2010-11-24 11:08:
Be sure to limit the usage of the list to the affected account and maybe
even to bounce sender addresses as a lot of legit
Zitat von Patric Falinder :
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de skrev 2010-11-24 11:08:
Zitat von Patric Falinder :
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de skrev 2010-11-24 10:22:
Zitat von Patric Falinder :
Hi,
A colleague of mine gets a lot of weird Delivery Status Notifications,
Failure Notice and Rejected messages. Yes
El 24/11/10 18:41, Victor Duchovni escribió:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 06:35:19PM +0100, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
Hello,
I'm running postfix (version 2.5.5, from debian lenny package) with
amavis
and spamassassin for spam checks.
For amavis and SA to work, we have 2 postfix instan
El 25/11/10 01:05, Jeroen Geilman escribió:
header_checks is a cleanup(8) setting, not an smtpd(8) one.
You can specify a different cleanup service by adding
-o cleanup_service_name=my_cleanup_service
to your SA resubmission smtpd listener, and defining
my_cleanup_service unix - - - - - clea
On 23/11/2010 17.37, Noel Jones wrote:
On 11/23/2010 5:54 AM, Angelo Amoruso wrote:
Hi,
is there any way for postfix to change the outgoing relayhost
using a sort of policy server?
Postfix doesn't directly support that, although there may be
workarounds for some situations. What information
Ansgar Wiechers skrev 2010-11-25 09:44:
On 2010-11-25 Patric Falinder wrote:
Ansgar Wiechers skrev 2010-11-24 18:11:
On 2010-11-24 Patric Falinder wrote:
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de skrev 2010-11-24 11:08:
Be sure to limit the usage of the list to the affected account and maybe
even to bounce sender
Hi, i'm having some problems in my mta server.
I'm running Suse 10.1 , Postfix 2.2.9.
Suddenly i started receiving ths var/log/mail logs:
...
Nov 25 08:43:28 cluster2 postfix/smtpd[7088]: fatal: watchdog timeout
Nov 25 08:43:28 cluster2 postfix/smtpd[7062]: fatal: watchdog timeout
Nov 25 08:43
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:33:33AM +0100, Angelo Amoruso wrote:
> One situation is when having Postfix using as smarthost your ISP
> smtp server.
> Nowadays the smtp server DNS record is actually a round-robin dns
> name or set of aliases which points to a pool of smtp servers.
>
> Example:
>
> s
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 06:34:03AM -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> And "dig outmx.site. mx" yields this:
> outmx.site. IN 600 10 goodrelay.1.example.net.
> outmx.site. IN 600 10 goodrelay.2.example.net.
> ...
Coffee deprivation, sorry. More like this:
outmx.site. 600 IN
Augusto Casagrande:
> daemon_timeout = 5
Delete that line from main.cf.
Wietse
I have a file: recipient_checks with mym...@example.com REJECT and the
corresponding hashed recipient_checks.db.
In main.cf I have:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
..
..
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/maps/recipient_checks
The transport is: virtual_transport = dovecot.
When
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 09:22:09AM +0100, Thomas L?cke wrote:
> I've used the following Slackware build script to create a Slackware
> 13.1 Postfix 2.7.1 package:
>
> http://pastebin.com/cfDZJGXf
Alan's a good ol' boy and friend and colleague of mine, but I told
him that hardcoding the version i
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 01:54:49PM +0100, Mauro wrote:
> I have a file: recipient_checks with mym...@example.com REJECT and the
> corresponding hashed recipient_checks.db.
> In main.cf I have:
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>..
> ..
The elided lines might have been significant.
>
On 2010-11-25 Patric Falinder wrote:
> Ansgar Wiechers skrev 2010-11-25 09:44:
>> You could try something like this:
>>
>> # /etc/postfix/main.cf
>> ...
>> smtpd_restriction_classes = backscatter_rbl
>> backscatter_rbl = reject_rbl_client ips.backscatterer.org
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>>
Stephen Thorne:
> G'day,
>
> I've been investigating an issue with using Sender Address Verification
> using address_verify_sender.
>
> I've established that there is a problem with the implementation of
> pipelining used by Microsoft's servers, here's an example of the broken
> behaviour:
>
> #
On 11/25/2010 07:06 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 09:22:09AM +0100, Thomas L?cke wrote:
I've used the following Slackware build script to create a Slackware
13.1 Postfix 2.7.1 package:
http://pastebin.com/cfDZJGXf
Alan's a good ol' boy and friend and colleague of mine, but I tol
Hello,
my question is about not sending "non-delivery notification". I want
to tell postfix, that in case on non delivery it has not to send any
messages.. Is it possible?
It should be useful for mass mailing servers..
--
Lukas
UAB nSoft
http://www.nsoft.lt
+370 655 10 655
* Lukas :
> Hello,
>
> my question is about not sending "non-delivery notification". I want
> to tell postfix, that in case on non delivery it has not to send any
> messages.. Is it possible?
Yes
> It should be useful for mass mailing servers..
Why not use the non-delivery notifications to cl
Hi,
>> my question is about not sending "non-delivery notification". I want
>> to tell postfix, that in case on non delivery it has not to send any
>> messages.. Is it possible?
>
> Yes
And how?
>> It should be useful for mass mailing servers..
>
> Why not use the non-delivery notifications to
On 11/25/2010 2:44 AM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
On 2010-11-25 Patric Falinder wrote:
Ansgar Wiechers skrev 2010-11-24 18:11:
On 2010-11-24 Patric Falinder wrote:
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de skrev 2010-11-24 11:08:
Be sure to limit the usage of the list to the affected account and maybe
even to bounce s
Lukas:
> Hi,
>
> >> ?my question is about not sending "non-delivery notification". I want
> >> to tell postfix, that in case on non delivery it has not to send any
> >> messages.. Is it possible?
> >
> > Yes
> And how?
>
> >> ?It should be useful for mass mailing servers..
> >
> > Why not use the
* Lukas :
> Hi,
>
> >> my question is about not sending "non-delivery notification". I want
> >> to tell postfix, that in case on non delivery it has not to send any
> >> messages.. Is it possible?
> >
> > Yes
> And how?
You could create a bounce template containing a random character
sequence a
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> Maybe use the normal header_checks instead... But I wonder if a bounce
> (as generated by Postfix) is subject to header_checks!
Nope. But one can change this using:
internal_mail_filter_classes = bounce
bounce
Inspect the content of delivery status notifications.
notify
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a requirement to be able to monitor a postfix queue over time,
and to determine whether any messages are delayed due to problems
connecting to a remote servers.
The mail system concerned is pretty simple; messages are generated
locally and rel
Hi,
in the past couple of days we have been somewhat hit by quite a lot of
brute force SASL related attacks.
I've now adapted fail2ban to catch those attacks, but I am wondering how
others fight those attacks.
Maybe there is something similar like a RBL for brute force attacks?
--
Udo Rader, C
Mark Watts:
>
> I have a requirement to be able to monitor a postfix queue over time,
> and to determine whether any messages are delayed due to problems
> connecting to a remote servers.
>
> The mail system concerned is pretty simple; messages are generated
> locally and relayed to a remote serv
Augusto Casagrande:
> I change it to 5 , because my system went u_n_s_t_a_b_l_e and it crashed.
Get a better machine, or set default_process_limit=10 in main.cf
and restart Postfix.
Wietse
> If i put the default parameter, the use of the cpu is permanent and
> the system does not respond
On 2010-11-25 Noel Jones wrote:
> On 11/25/2010 2:44 AM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
>> However, you can't use reject_rbl_client in these tables (see man 5
>> access).
>
> Yes, you can use reject_rbl_client (or any other built-in restriction)
> as a result of a table lookup. Restriction classes are onl
On Thursday 25 November 2010 17:12:22 Lukas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> my question is about not sending "non-delivery notification". I want
> >> to tell postfix, that in case on non delivery it has not to send any
> >> messages.. Is it possible?
> >
> > Yes
>
> And how?
>
> >> It should be useful fo
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:24:32AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
>> However, you can't use reject_rbl_client in these tables (see man 5
>> access).
>
> Yes, you can use reject_rbl_client (or any other built-in restriction) as a
> result of a table lookup. Restriction classes are only required if you
Le 24/11/2010 11:04, Patric Falinder a écrit :
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de skrev 2010-11-24 10:22:
Zitat von Patric Falinder :
Hi,
A colleague of mine gets a lot of weird Delivery Status Notifications,
Failure Notice and Rejected messages. Yesterday she got 200 of them..
They all come from different
Zitat von mouss :
Le 24/11/2010 11:04, Patric Falinder a écrit :
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de skrev 2010-11-24 10:22:
Zitat von Patric Falinder :
Hi,
A colleague of mine gets a lot of weird Delivery Status Notifications,
Failure Notice and Rejected messages. Yesterday she got 200 of them..
They all
On 2010-11-25, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Looks like Microsoft has "bluewashed" the Frontbridge software
> after acquiring that company (i.e. they replaced the alien code
> by their own). Bluewashing is the word at IBM for this process.
We have reported this bug to Microsoft through our clients who ar
No, i believe it is a disk issue. I'm changing it.
Thanks
El , Wietse Venema escribió:
Augusto Casagrande:
> I change it to 5 , because my system went u_n_s_t_a_b_l_e and it
crashed.
Get a better machine, or set default_process_limit=10 in main.cf
and restart Postfix.
Wietse
On 2010-11-25, Udo Rader wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in the past couple of days we have been somewhat hit by quite a lot of
> brute force SASL related attacks.
>
> I've now adapted fail2ban to catch those attacks, but I am wondering how
> others fight those attacks.
>
> Maybe there is something similar lik
Am 26.11.2010 01:39, schrieb Stephen Thorne:
> On 2010-11-25, Udo Rader wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> in the past couple of days we have been somewhat hit by quite a lot of
>> brute force SASL related attacks.
>>
>> I've now adapted fail2ban to catch those attacks, but I am wondering how
>> others fight thos
Hi,
I need to create statistics for postfix mailserver, mainly counting
number each user incoming and outcoming emails/day.
What is best software for this kind of statics?
br,
--
Eero
39 matches
Mail list logo
