Hi guys
Im a newbie using postfix and Im having problems with a domain. Im
having no more than 100 accounts subscribed using ldap + postfix, and
sometimes when users goes to send a message this arrives how a bad
subdomain, and always the same. User with domain u...@mydomain.com
arrives to other us
Hi,
A colleague of mine gets a lot of weird Delivery Status Notifications,
Failure Notice and Rejected messages. Yesterday she got 200 of them..
They all come from different servers and they are most from Russia and
Japan and they are countries that we have no connection to at all.
I've looked
Zitat von Patric Falinder :
Hi,
A colleague of mine gets a lot of weird Delivery Status
Notifications, Failure Notice and Rejected messages. Yesterday she
got 200 of them..
They all come from different servers and they are most from Russia
and Japan and they are countries that we have no
Hello!
I manage a mixed mail system (postfix, sendmail, etc).
The mail routing works with internal email addressing.
I don't want to communicate local/internal addresses with the "world".
I search about that, and i found body_check REPLACE solutions to hide
internal address(IP,email), but the p
Gary Smith put forth on 11/23/2010 11:47 PM:
>> "My general advice WRT to VPS/colo/hosting outfits such as Softlayer,
>> Limestone, Sharktech, Hostnoc, Colocation America, Colo4, SingleHop,
>> Liquid Web, ServePath, GigeNet, WholeSale Internet, FDCservers,
>> CarolinaNet, Hurricane Electric, et al
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de skrev 2010-11-24 10:22:
Zitat von Patric Falinder :
Hi,
A colleague of mine gets a lot of weird Delivery Status Notifications,
Failure Notice and Rejected messages. Yesterday she got 200 of them..
They all come from different servers and they are most from Russia and
Japan
Zitat von Patric Falinder :
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de skrev 2010-11-24 10:22:
Zitat von Patric Falinder :
Hi,
A colleague of mine gets a lot of weird Delivery Status Notifications,
Failure Notice and Rejected messages. Yesterday she got 200 of them..
They all come from different servers and they
Zitat von deconya :
Hi guys
Im a newbie using postfix and Im having problems with a domain. Im
having no more than 100 accounts subscribed using ldap + postfix, and
sometimes when users goes to send a message this arrives how a bad
subdomain, and always the same. User with domain u...@mydomain.
Hi,
I want to put throttling in postfix.
Throttling can be of two types :
1. Domain wise throttling (i.e. postfix should sent only 10 mails to
gmail.com and 20 to yahoo.com at a time)
2. On hour basis throttling (i.e. postfix should sent only 1 emails in 1
hour)
Is it possible to have such
Avinash Pawar // Viva put forth on 11/24/2010 4:48 AM:
> Hi,
>
> I want to put throttling in postfix.
>
> Throttling can be of two types :
>
> 1. Domain wise throttling (i.e. postfix should sent only 10 mails to
> gmail.com and 20 to yahoo.com at a time)
> 2. On hour basis throttling (i.e. postf
Stan Hoeppner:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> Wietse Venema put forth on 11/23/2010 6:57 PM:
> > Victor Duchovni:
> >> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 07:35:49PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >>
> >>> Victor Duchovni:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 05:20:11PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote
Wietse Venema put forth on 11/24/2010 6:18 AM:
> That's 0.5 seconds to read the table once, and milliseconds to query it.
Is it? I must be misreading this then. But it sure looks like each
query is taking over half a second.
Table has 67669 CIDRs:
[r...@greer]/etc/postfix/cidr_files$ time pos
Stan Hoeppner:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> Wietse Venema put forth on 11/24/2010 6:18 AM:
>
> > That's 0.5 seconds to read the table once, and milliseconds to query it.
>
> Is it? I must be misreading this then. But it sure looks like each
> query is taking over half a s
On 11/24/2010 7:17 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Avinash Pawar // Viva put forth on 11/24/2010 4:48 AM:
Hi,
I want to put throttling in postfix.
Throttling can be of two types :
1. Domain wise throttling (i.e. postfix should sent only 10 mails to
gmail.com and 20 to yahoo.com at a time)
2. On hour
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de skrev 2010-11-24 11:08:
Zitat von Patric Falinder :
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de skrev 2010-11-24 10:22:
Zitat von Patric Falinder :
Hi,
A colleague of mine gets a lot of weird Delivery Status Notifications,
Failure Notice and Rejected messages. Yesterday she got 200 of them..
T
Hello,
This is, again, for mail server 101.
It seems my postfix/dovecot server on ubuntu 10.10 is working well. However, I
notice that mail sent to 'mail@' is loaded with spam.
Is it possible to disable the 'mail' user, or reject mail sent to m...@? What
should I do?
Thank you, in advance, fo
On 2010-11-24 Patric Falinder wrote:
> lst_ho...@kwsoft.de skrev 2010-11-24 11:08:
>> Be sure to limit the usage of the list to the affected account and maybe
>> even to bounce sender addresses as a lot of legitim hosts are listed.
>> See http://www.backscatterer.org/?target=usage
>
> Ok, thanks!
On 2010-11-24 Bruce Perryman wrote:
> It seems my postfix/dovecot server on ubuntu 10.10 is working well.
> However, I notice that mail sent to 'mail@' is loaded with spam.
>
> Is it possible to disable the 'mail' user, or reject mail sent to
> m...@? What should I do?
You can set "local_recipien
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 08:53:45AM -0800, Bruce Perryman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is, again, for mail server 101.
>
> It seems my postfix/dovecot server on ubuntu 10.10 is working well. However,
> I notice that mail sent to 'mail@' is loaded with spam.
>
> Is it possible to disable the 'mail'
Hello,
for setting up some mailing lists I don't want to list the users mail
addresses directly in the group (as in the LDAP-Howto #1), nor would I
like to use the dn (as in Example #2).
We use a uidNumber as user attribute that never changes (except if it is
deleted), so it would be conveni
Hello,
I'm running postfix (version 2.5.5, from debian lenny package) with
amavis and spamassassin for spam checks.
For amavis and SA to work, we have 2 postfix instances, the main one
running in port 25 and other running in other port 2500 that receive
mails from amavis.
In the first o
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 06:31:18PM +0100, Neven Luetic wrote:
> for setting up some mailing lists I don't want to list the users mail
> addresses directly in the group (as in the LDAP-Howto #1), nor would I like
> to use the dn (as in Example #2).
If you don't want to do it the right way, you g
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 06:35:19PM +0100, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm running postfix (version 2.5.5, from debian lenny package) with
> amavis
> and spamassassin for spam checks.
>
> For amavis and SA to work, we have 2 postfix instances, the main one
> running in port 25
for setting up some mailing lists I don't want to list the users mail
addresses directly in the group (as in the LDAP-Howto #1), nor would I like
to use the dn (as in Example #2).
If you don't want to do it the right way, you get to do it the hard way,
whatever that is.
amazing ...
Suppo
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 07:44:57PM +0100, Neven Luetic wrote:
>
>>
>>> for setting up some mailing lists I don't want to list the users mail
>>> addresses directly in the group (as in the LDAP-Howto #1), nor would I
>>> like
>>> to use the dn (as in Example #2).
>>
>> If you don't want to do it t
Wietse Venema put forth on 11/24/2010 7:20 AM:
> Stan Hoeppner:
> [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
>> Wietse Venema put forth on 11/24/2010 6:18 AM:
>>
>>> That's 0.5 seconds to read the table once, and milliseconds to query it.
>>
>> Is it? I must be misreading this then. But it
Stan Hoeppner:
> Wietse Venema put forth on 11/24/2010 6:18 AM:
>
> > That's 0.5 seconds to read the table once, and milliseconds to query it.
>
> Is it? I must be misreading this then. But it sure looks like each
> query is taking over half a second.
>
> Table has 67669 CIDRs:
>
> [r...@gree
Some text was lost ruring cut-and-paste. I have added it below.
Wietse
Stan Hoeppner:
> Wietse Venema put forth on 11/24/2010 6:18 AM:
>
> > That's 0.5 seconds to read the table once, and milliseconds to query it.
>
> Is it? I must be misreading this then. But it sure looks like each
On Nov 24, 2010, at 1:50 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> You'd be better off with SliceHost (RackSpace) than HE, and SliceHost
> sucks from a delivery standpoint.
Hmm... Interesting. Delivery as in transactional or bulk? I only had one or
two slices from them, and off the bat had decent reputation
Wietse Venema put forth on 11/24/2010 1:35 PM:
> Stan Hoeppner:
>> Wietse Venema put forth on 11/24/2010 6:18 AM:
>>
>>> That's 0.5 seconds to read the table once, and milliseconds to query it.
>>
>> Is it? I must be misreading this then. But it sure looks like each
>> query is taking over half a
Brian Evans - Postfix List put forth on 11/24/2010 7:54 AM:
> On 11/24/2010 7:17 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> -o transport_destination_rate_delay = 16s
>
> It's worth noting that transport_destination_rate_delay is implemented
> in qmgr and not the smtp client.
> Therefore, specifying "-o" is wort
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 02:06:52PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Thank you for the detailed explanation Wietse. Given the low mail
> volume of this MX (<2000 connections/day) would increasing max_idle from
> 100s to something like 5m or 10m be sane, to keep proxymap alive longer,
Yes, that may b
Stan Hoeppner:
> Thank you for the detailed explanation Wietse. Given the low mail
> volume of this MX (<2000 connections/day) would increasing max_idle from
> 100s to something like 5m or 10m be sane, to keep proxymap alive longer,
> thus decreasing the frequency of table parsing, and thus total
On 11/24/2010 3:22 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Brian Evans - Postfix List put forth on 11/24/2010 7:54 AM:
On 11/24/2010 7:17 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
-o transport_destination_rate_delay = 16s
It's worth noting that transport_destination_rate_delay is implemented
in qmgr and not the smtp client.
On 11/24/2010 3:35 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
No.. it's [transport-name]_destination_rate_delay. "slowdown" is the
transport in this example.
This allows processes such as qmgr to control things per transport (a
feature of Postfix 2.5+)
Please ignore the "feature of Postfix 2.5" for
Will Fong put forth on 11/24/2010 1:51 PM:
> On Nov 24, 2010, at 1:50 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> You'd be better off with SliceHost (RackSpace) than HE, and SliceHost
>> sucks from a delivery standpoint.
>
> Hmm... Interesting. Delivery as in transactional or bulk? I only had one or
> two s
Brian Evans - Postfix List:
> On 11/24/2010 3:35 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> > No.. it's [transport-name]_destination_rate_delay. "slowdown" is the
> > transport in this example.
> > This allows processes such as qmgr to control things per transport (a
> > feature of Postfix 2.5+)
>
Wietse Venema put forth on 11/24/2010 2:26 PM:
> My objection was to your suggestion that a single postmap command
> is representative of Postfix performance. Given that there is easily
> a factor 100 difference in compile time versus query time, a single
> postmap command is typical only for mach
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 10:18 PM, zhong ming wu wrote:
> On this list you will be asked for output of "postconf -n" and not
> what you think is relevant.
Fair enough. I am going to try some things and if I am still having
problems, will submit my full configuration to the list.
> This is depreca
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 05:33:31PM -0500, chris guirl wrote:
> > You also don't specify whether your server is an MSA only, or also an
> > MX host.
>
> It appears the problem is more complicated than I previously thought.
> I think I am misunderstanding the intent of some of these security
> meas
On 11/24/2010 06:35 PM, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
Hello,
I'm running postfix (version 2.5.5, from debian lenny package)
with amavis and spamassassin for spam checks.
For amavis and SA to work, we have 2 postfix instances, the main
one running in port 25 and other running in other port 25
On 11/24/2010 10:38 AM, Laszlo Kupor wrote:
Hello!
I manage a mixed mail system (postfix, sendmail, etc).
Meaning ?
You shouldn't run multiple MTAs on the same system.
The mail routing works with internal email addressing.
That's quite normal.
I don't want to communicate local/in
G'day,
I've been investigating an issue with using Sender Address Verification
using address_verify_sender.
I've established that there is a problem with the implementation of
pipelining used by Microsoft's servers, here's an example of the broken
behaviour:
# telnet 65.55.88.22 25
Trying 65.55.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 04:44:10PM +1000, Stephen Thorne wrote:
> G'day,
>
> I've been investigating an issue with using Sender Address Verification
> using address_verify_sender.
>
> I've established that there is a problem with the implementation of
> pipelining used by Microsoft's servers, he
44 matches
Mail list logo
