Postfix and restrictions for more than 200 remote recipients.

2010-11-22 Thread Josef Karliak
Hi everybody, some users from our company sends sometimes mails for about 300, 500, ... recipients. Is it possible to slow down delivering emails with this counts ? All others will've priority, emails with xxx recipients will be delivered with low priority. There could be solution with

Re: reject_unauth_destination status=2, should be 0

2010-11-22 Thread Ben
Le 20/11/2010 20:55, Victor Duchovni a écrit : On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 07:45:41PM +0100, Ben wrote: Thank you for your help ! The recipient domain should be configured as final, but is not. I think that's the problem. I joined the information you asked to avoid line breaking. Turn off verbos

Re: E-mail more than 889 characters in line 1 DKIM Authentication Error

2010-11-22 Thread Wietse Venema
vfx9as: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > (10/11/22 01:33), Wietse Venema wrote: > > vfx9as: > >> 2010/11/21 Wietse Venema : > >>> vfx9as: > In 980 characters or more lines as it will split 1 postfix, and long > lines to fill in > Line characters sent so I do not th

Re: Postfix and restrictions for more than 200 remote recipients.

2010-11-22 Thread Wietse Venema
Josef Karliak: >Hi everybody, >some users from our company sends sometimes mails for about 300, > 500, ... recipients. Is it possible to slow down delivering emails > with this counts ? All others will've priority, emails with xxx > recipients will be delivered with low priority. Pos

mynetworks or sasl auth

2010-11-22 Thread b2
Hi list, I have to setup my postfix virtual mailbox configuration to permit all clients listed in mynetworks without SASL authentication , but all others (remote networks/users) to authenticate themselves with username and password. Anyone know how to do it ? Thanks in advance. signature.asc De

Re: mynetworks or sasl auth

2010-11-22 Thread postfix
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html suomi On 2010-11-22 16:33, b2 wrote: Hi list, I have to setup my postfix virtual mailbox configuration to permit all clients listed in mynetworks without SASL authentication , but all others (remote networks/users) to authenticate themselves with username

Re: mynetworks or sasl auth

2010-11-22 Thread b2
10x , I find the option that i needed : smtpd_sasl_exceptions_networks = $mynetworks В 16:57 +0100 на 22.11.2010 (пн), postfix написа: > http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html > > suomi > > On 2010-11-22 16:33, b2 wrote: > > Hi list, > > I have to setup my postfix virtual mailbox configurat

Re: mynetworks or sasl auth

2010-11-22 Thread Rich
So your question is to have anyone on mynetwork to not have to authenticate and have anyone who is not on mynetwork to have to authenticate? *smtpd_sasl_exceptions_networks=$mynetworks* 2010/11/22 b2 > Hi list, > I have to setup my postfix virtual mailbox configuration to permit all > clients l

Re: mynetworks or sasl auth

2010-11-22 Thread b2
That's right. В 11:31 -0500 на 22.11.2010 (пн), Rich написа: > So your question is to have anyone on mynetwork to not have to > authenticate and have anyone who is not on mynetwork to have to > authenticate? > smtpd_sasl_exceptions_networks=$mynetworks > > > 2010/11/22 b2 > > Hi list,

Re: Require TLS and authentication with Postfix + Dovecot

2010-11-22 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 09:41:09PM -0500, chris guirl wrote: > I've setup a Postfix server to handle SMTP for a few domains on my > local network. I don't want to rely on clients to "do the right thing" > and trust them to enable encryption and authentication on their own. > So, I'd like to disabl

Re: Block A Sender in Postfix

2010-11-22 Thread Carlos Mennens
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Pete wrote: > The format of my smtp_client_access file is like so : > > .dodgyhost.tld                         REJECT Spam sewer. > .evilspammer.tld                       REJECT Spam sewer. > > The format of my smtp_sender_access file is like so : > > barrelshoot.

Re: Block A Sender in Postfix

2010-11-22 Thread Rich Shepard
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Carlos Mennens wrote: Both client_access & sender_access appear to have the same formatting: some.domain.tld REJECT another.domain.tld REJECT Am I correct or have I missed something? Carlos, I use a badaddr file that lists domains from whom I will not acc

Re: E-mail more than 889 characters in line 1 DKIM Authentication Error

2010-11-22 Thread vfx9as
(10/11/22 14:05), vfx9as wrote: > > > > The problem is the order of processing > > > > sendmail Line splitting & CR Handling -> milter # Authentication Success > > postfixmilter -> Line splitting & CR Handling # Authentication failure postfix, sendmail differences in behavior problems. Whic

Re: E-mail more than 889 characters in line 1 DKIM Authentication Error

2010-11-22 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 03:06:33AM +0900, vfx9as wrote: > (10/11/22 14:05), vfx9as wrote: > > > > > > The problem is the order of processing > > > > > > sendmail Line splitting & CR Handling -> milter # Authentication > > > Success > > > postfixmilter -> Line splitting & CR Handling # Aut

Re: How to replace underscores in hostnames to a valid character?

2010-11-22 Thread Bill Cole
Bron Gondwana wrote, On 11/18/10 8:14 AM: On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:55:14AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote: On 11/18/2010 3:12 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote: Hi All, I've been having issues where emails are being rejected by Cyrus because the "From" address contains an underscore in the domain name. ...

Re: E-mail more than 889 characters in line 1 DKIM Authentication Error

2010-11-22 Thread Wietse Venema
vfx9as: > (10/11/22 14:05), vfx9as wrote: > > > > > > The problem is the order of processing > > > > > > sendmail Line splitting & CR Handling -> milter # Authentication > > > Success > > > postfixmilter -> Line splitting & CR Handling # Authentication > > > failure > postfix, sendmail di

Re: E-mail more than 889 characters in line 1 DKIM Authentication Error

2010-11-22 Thread vfx9as
(10/11/23 03:25), Victor Duchovni wrote: > One approach is to sign in post-queue content filters, and to force > content downgrades when delivering into the content filter, so that > the filter sees "normalized" email. Better yet, send email that > requires no downgrading. > Good idea! Thank yo

NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT 450 4.7.1 Recipient address rejected: Service is unavailable

2010-11-22 Thread Jason Lukasiewicz
(1) Some mail is getting delayed, or not delivered at all (see error log below). Not well versed in this. Any help appreciated. (postcon ­n attached) (2) uncertain how to rid myself of all the Anvil messages. Can I turn it off somehow if I do not require it ? Kind comments only please ;-) --

Re: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT 450 4.7.1 Recipient address rejected: Service is unavailable

2010-11-22 Thread Wietse Venema
Jason Lukasiewicz: > Nov 22 12:59:33 mail postfix/smtpd[73566]: warning: connect to > private/anvil: Connection refused > Nov 22 12:59:33 mail postfix/smtpd[73566]: warning: problem talking to > server private/anvil: Connection refused Apparently, your master.cf file is for an older version of Pos

Re: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT 450 4.7.1 Recipient address rejected: Service is unavailable

2010-11-22 Thread Jason Lukasiewicz
I "migrated" from a Mac OS Server 10.4.11 to a Mac OS X Server 10.6. New Xserve and new software . . . . But it's likely the "migration" (auto copying all old files) that is screwing me up. What the f$#@ do I do now ? By the way, I am pretty impressed getting a response from "The Big Cheese" .

Re: Block A Sender in Postfix

2010-11-22 Thread Carlos Mennens
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Rich Shepard wrote: > Carlos, > >  I use a badaddr file that lists domains from whom I will not accept > messages. The content looks like these: > > hostforreal.com                         550 Rejected domain D23 > nasty-mailings.com                      550 Reject

Re: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT 450 4.7.1 Recipient address rejected: Service is unavailable

2010-11-22 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:00:45PM -0500, Jason Lukasiewicz wrote: > I "migrated" from a Mac OS Server 10.4.11 to a Mac OS X Server 10.6. > New Xserve and new software . . . . But it's likely the "migration" (auto > copying all old files) that is screwing me up. > > What the f$#@ do I do now ?

Re: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT 450 4.7.1 Recipient address rejected: Service is unavailable

2010-11-22 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:15:52PM -0500, Jason Lukasiewicz wrote: > I appreciate your response. I have tried that, and just now again . . . > > mail:~ root# postfix set-permissions upgrade-configuration > chown: /etc/postfix/makedefs.out: No such file or directory That's likely harmless. This

Re: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT 450 4.7.1 Recipient address rejected: Service is unavailable

2010-11-22 Thread Wietse Venema
Jason Lukasiewicz: > I "migrated" from a Mac OS Server 10.4.11 to a Mac OS X Server 10.6. > New Xserve and new software . . . . But it's likely the "migration" (auto > copying all old files) that is screwing me up. Ah. I suppose that MacOS should provide you with the proper support, or did you ju

Re: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT 450 4.7.1 Recipient address rejected: Service is unavailable

2010-11-22 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:34:48PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > Jason Lukasiewicz: > > I "migrated" from a Mac OS Server 10.4.11 to a Mac OS X Server 10.6. > > New Xserve and new software . . . . But it's likely the "migration" (auto > > copying all old files) that is screwing me up. > > Ah. I

Re: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT 450 4.7.1 Recipient address rejected: Service is unavailable

2010-11-22 Thread Jerrale G
On 11/22/2010 2:00 PM, Jason Lukasiewicz wrote: By the way, I am pretty impressed getting a response from "The Big Cheese" Oh Timo, where for art thou Timo? This guy needs help from the "Big Cheese". Thanks for your help developing, too, Wietse Venema. Jerrale G. SC Senior Admin

Default certificate authorities

2010-11-22 Thread Michael Orlitzky
Where does Postfix get its list of "system-supplied default certificate authority certificates" [1]? If it's an OpenSSL thing, is there some way I can make it spit the list out? [1] http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#tls_append_default_CA

Strange error

2010-11-22 Thread Jack Raats
Can anyone explain this error? What does it mean? Nov 22 16:10:03 delta1 postfix/sendmail[60981]: fatal: www(80): No recipient addresses found in message header Nov 22 16:31:46 delta1 postfix/sendmail[61690]: fatal: www(80): No recipient addresses found in message header Nov 22 16:44:13 delta1

Re: Default certificate authorities

2010-11-22 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 04:21:05PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > Where does Postfix get its list of "system-supplied default certificate > authority certificates" [1]? If it's an OpenSSL thing, is there some way > I can make it spit the list out? Fine the OpenSSL command-line utility that matc

Re: Strange error

2010-11-22 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:33:15PM +0100, Jack Raats wrote: > Can anyone explain this error? > > What does it mean? > > Nov 22 16:10:03 delta1 postfix/sendmail[60981]: fatal: www(80): No > recipient addresses found in message header The user "www" ran "sendmail -t" on a file with no "To:/Cc:/Bcc