As the list refuses me to post such long debugs, I'm splitting my mail in
two:
This is application specific mail (actually some delivery reports for MMS)
and I need to do a lot of envelope and content rewrites as different
operators have rather specific approach to standards.. But luckily postfix
Part two:
And here it is with the reverse order (Received: before To:), hence missed
(had to delete some generic parts to post):
Sep 13 13:25:16 mta3 pfx/smtpd[16755]: [..info] connect from
unknown[10.40.0.20]
Sep 13 13:25:16 mta3 pfx/smtpd[16755]: [..info] match_hostname: unknown ~?
10.40.0.33/3
Jure Simsic:
> As the list refuses me to post such long debugs, I'm splitting my mail in
> two:
No-one here asked for DEBUG logging, so you just wasted a lot
of electrons sending information that no-one will look at.
Wietse
Wietse Venema:
> Vernon A. Fort:
> > Also, since postscreen cache's the dnsbl hits -
>
> Only for a split second. However, the lookups will be cached in
> the local DNS server, which you should have if your mail server
> handles a non-trivial amount of email.
The postscreen daemon is meant to ke
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jure Simsic:
> > As the list refuses me to post such long debugs, I'm splitting my mail in
> > two:
>
> No-one here asked for DEBUG logging, so you just wasted a lot
> of electrons sending information that no-one will look at.
>
>
Ok, that's
Jure Simsic:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Jure Simsic:
> > > As the list refuses me to post such long debugs, I'm splitting my mail in
> > > two:
> >
> > No-one here asked for DEBUG logging, so you just wasted a lot
> > of electrons sending information that no-one
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jure Simsic:
> > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Wietse Venema
> wrote:
> >
> > > Jure Simsic:
> > > > As the list refuses me to post such long debugs, I'm splitting my
> mail in
> > > > two:
> > >
> > > No-one here asked for DEBUG logging
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 03:45:17PM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
> > Anonymous DH ciphers don't use CA certs. The conversation is encrypted,
> > but unathenticated. Of course "Trusted" is also encrypted and not
> > authenticated, but a certificate is sent and mostly ignored. What you
> > learn is t
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 05:35:45PM +0200, Jure Simsic wrote:
> Matched:
> 220 mms1.mms.domain1.com ESMTP Service (Multimedia IP message store
> 6.1.999.11) ready
> EHLO mms-mta3.domain1.com
> 250-mms1.mms.domain1.com
> 250-DSN
> 250-8BITMIME
> 250-PIPELINING
> 250-HELP
> 250-AU
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Victor Duchovni <
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 05:35:45PM +0200, Jure Simsic wrote:
>
> BLANK LINE TERMINATES THE HEADER: the content below is BODY content.
>
Thanks, just figured it out. Actually it was not the blank line bu
On 9/16/10 7:56 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 22:40:10 +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 09/16/2010 10:33 PM, Brian Pribis wrote:
When I receive an email addressed to, say, t...@virtual_domain.com,
I want this forwarded to someone_e...@virtual_domain.com.
I have this done in the
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 11:42 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 03:45:17PM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
>
> Yes, it looks like that Patch did not make it in.
I just happen to run across your post a few days ago - cleared some
things up but I could NOT find this in the TLS_READM
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:09:14AM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
> I fully agree and this IS the way i have it configured - my original
> post was poorly written. Using =may on both in/out but configure
> smtp_tls_policy_maps for sites that I need tighter verification. I'm
> playing (for lack of
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 12:17 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:09:14AM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
>
> > I fully agree and this IS the way i have it configured - my original
> > post was poorly written. Using =may on both in/out but configure
> > smtp_tls_policy_maps for
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:33:58AM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 12:17 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:09:14AM -0500, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
> >
> > > I fully agree and this IS the way i have it configured - my original
> > > post was poorly writ
Hi all
I'm migrating all my system to a new server step by step running suse 10.3
in both side and ' ve just installed Horde and Imp, database setup too, I
have verified my setup with test.php
page and all passed. However when I try and log into Horde/Imp I get this
error:
A fatal error has occur
Oscar Mauricio Cruz Lazo:
> However when I try and log into HORDE/IMP I get this error:
> [...] when i check my APACHE log everything looks fine
This is not the right mailing list for questions about Horde/Imp
or Apache logging.
Wietse
17 matches
Mail list logo
