On 2010-08-22 Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
> I got a curiosity, I have noted that the Date header the mail takes
> comes from the client computer, so, if my computer have a wrong date,
> my mail will go out with a wrong date too.
>
> I know the server will put its own timestamp when it pro
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:40, listadecorreo
wrote:
> In the configuration of my main.cf, I have all mail sent to an external
> server (relayhost) I can do to check if the server is operational and if it
> fails to send all mail to another server
>
> relayhost=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx if fail send
listadecorreo:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> Hi to all
>
> In the configuration of my main.cf, I have all mail sent to an external
> server (relayhost) I can do to check if the server is operational and if
> it fails to send all mail to another server
>
> relayhost=xxx.xxx
Hi!
Thanks for your answer!
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2010-08-22 Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
>> I got a curiosity, I have noted that the Date header the mail takes
>> comes from the client computer, so, if my computer have a wrong date,
>> my mail will
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 08:58:35PM +1100, Winston Smith wrote:
> The ldap_table(5) man page states a parameter 'tls_key' which is confusing.
This is a client private key.
> Reading a bit more, there is a parameter 'tls_cert'
> which shall point to a 'client certificate'.
This is a client cert.
Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa:
> I have to ask: is there a way of making postfix rewrite Date header to
> server's time for authenticated mail? (or at list for a range of IPs),
No, but it is possible to delete the Date: header for mail that
is received via the submission service.
In the master.cf
I find that a lot of spam comes from recently registered, throw away
domains. The new domain may be used as the sender, hostname, or name server.
Are there any rbl type lists that block fresh domains, for the first 10-15
days of their existence?
* p...@alt-ctrl-del.org :
> I find that a lot of spam comes from recently registered, throw away
> domains. The new domain may be used as the sender, hostname, or name
> server.
>
> Are there any rbl type lists that block fresh domains, for the first
> 10-15 days of their existence?
I'd like to k
* p...@alt-ctrl-del.org :
> I find that a lot of spam comes from recently registered, throw away
> domains. The new domain may be used as the sender, hostname, or name
> server.
>
> Are there any rbl type lists that block fresh domains, for the first
> 10-15 days of their existence?
http://www.ma
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:30:48PM -0400, Alex wrote:
> I posted a message a few days ago, and still haven't been able to
> figure this out. I believe this is a result of the certificate having
> multiple DNS names and my TLS configuration not properly supporting
> that. Could that be the case?
W
On 8/23/2010 8:48 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* p...@alt-ctrl-del.org:
I find that a lot of spam comes from recently registered, throw away
domains. The new domain may be used as the sender, hostname, or name
server.
Are there any rbl type lists that block fresh domains, for the first
10-15 day
Noel Jones:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> On 8/23/2010 8:48 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > * p...@alt-ctrl-del.org:
> >> I find that a lot of spam comes from recently registered, throw away
> >> domains. The new domain may be used as the sender, hostname, or name
> >> server.
> >>
On 19-Aug-2010, at 13:08, D G Teed wrote:
>
> The only place I've seen which publicly talks about
> the reverse DNS requirement is AOL.
Craigslist requires that the reverse DNS match EXACTLY the mail server name.
So, if your mailserver doubles
as a dns server and your primary rDNS point to ns1.
On Aug 23, 2010, at 11:32 AM, LuKreme wrote:
> On 19-Aug-2010, at 13:08, D G Teed wrote:
>>
>> The only place I've seen which publicly talks about
>> the reverse DNS requirement is AOL.
>
> Craigslist requires that the reverse DNS match EXACTLY the mail server name.
> So, if your mailserver do
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:41:20PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Anyway, if you had the time and inclination and were able to get your hands on
> a few units, it would be great to see some basic queue performance data from
> you on SSD vs a disk based test rig you use.
All benchmarks are artifici
Noel Jones wrote:
I've also been playing with these:
http://spameatingmonkey.com/lists.html
The FRESH lists are what you're looking for.
Very nice.
I'm now using their geobl.spameatingmonkey.net, right before I accept a
delivery. But not for blocking. Just for statistics at this point.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:41:20PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Anyway, if you had the time and inclination and were able to get
> your hands on a few units, it would be great to see some basic
> queue performance data from you on SSD vs a disk based test rig
> you use.
Victor Duchovni:
> All ben
Hi!
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Stan Hoeppner put forth on 8/16/2010 6:56 PM:
>> Wietse Venema put forth on 8/16/2010 2:36 PM:
>>> Stan Hoeppner:
Google uses less than 1/10th of 1% "Enterprise grade" hardware, using the
typical definition of "Enterprise grade
Hi!
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:41:20PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Anyway, if you had the time and inclination and were able to get
>> your hands on a few units, it would be great to see some basic
>> queue performance data from you on S
On 08/23/2010 01:11 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
listadecorreo:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
Hi to all
In the configuration of my main.cf, I have all mail sent to an external
server (relayhost) I can do to check if the server is operational and if
it fails to send all mail
listadecorreo:
> > See: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_fallback_relay
> >
> Thanks a lot i'm using smtp_fallback_relay but show tis error
>
> Aug 23 19:27:52 jupiter postfix/smtpd[15705]: ECC30EA056:
> client=unknown[10.111.100.100]
> Aug 23 19:27:55 jupiter postfix/c
> >http://www.mail-archive.com/us...@spamassassin.apache.org/msg57008.html
> >Dunno if Marc is still active
> >
>
> Yes, the "hostkarma" lists are active, IMO best used in SA because
> they mix whitelist with blacklist using different return codes.
reject_dnsbl_client hostkarma.junkemailfilter.co
Thank you Wietse,
I tested with test-milter per your instructions and confirmed that
postfix does indeed include the i-macro. After some more digging I found
out that Fedora installed Sendmail::PMilter instead of the apparently
obsoleted Sendmail::Milter package. Unfortunately for some reason
PMil
Noip.com manages DNS for my FQDN.
Should virtual_mailbox_domains = mail.example.com
or only example.com
Thanks for your help.
Hi, I have a group of domains, that can't cope with our delivery rate,
I need to send them mail at most at 1/second, how should I achieve
that ?
I tried to create a new transport in master.cf and reroute these
domains thru this transpor but it doesn't seems to work.
Any Help ?
Regards, Pablo
Pablo Garcia Melga:
> Hi, I have a group of domains, that can't cope with our delivery rate,
> I need to send them mail at most at 1/second, how should I achieve
> that ?
> I tried to create a new transport in master.cf and reroute these
> domains thru this transpor but it doesn't seems to work.
>
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 08:58:35PM +1100, Winston Smith wrote:
>
> > The ldap_table(5) man page states a parameter 'tls_key' which is confusing.
>
> This is a client private key.
>
> > If that's the case, how can I turn this off?
>
> Leave these empty, which is the default. Don't configure y
27 matches
Mail list logo
