Subdomain Migration

2010-08-16 Thread ramesh
Hi All, I would like have suggestion for changing subdomain (belongs to ISP) to own domain, the scenario as below. Presently we have subdomain from ISP ( @xxx.isp.net) email id : ram...@xxx.isp.net ISP charges huge amount,thou others ISP charges less. so we have planned to migrate to our own

RE: Active Directory and virtual delivery agent

2010-08-16 Thread Aaron Roberts
> -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- > us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Jeroen Geilman > Sent: 15 August 2010 20:54 > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: Active Directory and virtual delivery agent > > On 08/13/2010 03:18 PM, Aaron Rob

Re: Active Directory and virtual delivery agent

2010-08-16 Thread zhong ming wu
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Aaron Roberts wrote: > Hi, >        I'm looking for a bit of inspiration... > > I have a number of linux boxes using winbind to provide UNIX system users > from a Win2008R2 Active Directory domain.  I'm using winbind's RID idmap > backend thing to provide consist

RE: Active Directory and virtual delivery agent

2010-08-16 Thread Aaron Roberts
> -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- > us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of zhong ming wu > Sent: 16 August 2010 12:02 > To: Postfix users > Subject: Re: Active Directory and virtual delivery agent > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Aaron Roberts

Re: cidr table on mysql database

2010-08-16 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Jack Knowlton put forth on 8/15/2010 4:53 PM: > Is it possible to store a CIDR access table on a mysql database? I'm pretty sure the answer is, NO. The solution to your problem is sticking the Postfix access table files you want shared across your MX farm on an NFS/CIFS server and mounting the s

Re: Problem with Postfix and LDAP...

2010-08-16 Thread Brian Evans - Postfix List
On 8/15/2010 4:47 PM, Christopher Kurtis Koeber wrote: Aug 15 16:32:57 WTS-ZIMBRA postfix/qmgr[18608]: 248B53220E2: from=, size=288, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Aug 15 16:32:57 WTS-ZIMBRA postfix/virtual[18620]: 248B53220E2: to=, orig_to=, relay=virtual, delay=23, delays=23/0.03/0/0.08, dsn=5.1.1, s

Re: Speed up queue injection

2010-08-16 Thread Ram
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 17:35 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote: > On Friday 13 August 2010 19:58:38 Noel Jones wrote: > > On 8/13/2010 8:22 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > > On Friday 13 August 2010 14:23:51 Wietse Venema wrote: > > >> Ralf Hildebrandt: > > >>> * Ram: > > Mail in plain text format , mime e

Re: cidr table on mysql database

2010-08-16 Thread Walter Pinto
I completely misunderstood his request, sorry.

Re: Speed up queue injection

2010-08-16 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Ram put forth on 8/16/2010 8:19 AM: > But Enterprise quality SSD's are so expensive. I can get an additional > server and still save money. I call BS: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820167023 $214 USD is _not_ expensive at all, and only a fraction of the cost of a server

Re: Problem with Postfix and LDAP...

2010-08-16 Thread Christopher Koeber
Well, maybe it will help to describe what I am trying to do. I have a list of folks in my OpenLDAP server that I would like accounts for. These accounts are for the 'students.wesleyseminary.edu' domain. I also have folks in a 'wesleyministrynetwork.com' domain that I would like mail to be sent to

Re: Speed up queue injection

2010-08-16 Thread Noel Jones
On 8/16/2010 9:36 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Ram put forth on 8/16/2010 8:19 AM: But Enterprise quality SSD's are so expensive. I can get an additional server and still save money. I call BS: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820167023 ... Yeah, it's fast. Whether you

Re: cidr table on mysql database

2010-08-16 Thread Bill Weiss
Jack Knowlton(jknowl...@vp44.com)@Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:53:33PM +0200: > Hi all. > Is it possible to store a CIDR access table on a mysql database? It would > be very useful so I could have a centralized list to serve all MXs' > instead of rsync'ing files each time. > Thanks, If you're comfortab

Re: Need advise on ISP postfix mail server

2010-08-16 Thread brian moore
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:46:53 +0700 Makara wrote: > Puthick, no authentication require for sending mail out because of > users knowledge limitation. We would like to solve the problem without > implement smtp authentication. use one of the pop-before-smtp packages. It's admittedly a kludge, but

Re: Problem with Postfix and LDAP...

2010-08-16 Thread Brian Evans - Postfix List
On 8/16/2010 10:45 AM, Christopher Koeber wrote: Well, maybe it will help to describe what I am trying to do. I have a list of folks in my OpenLDAP server that I would like accounts for. These accounts are for the 'students.wesleyseminary.edu ' domain. I

Re: Speed up queue injection

2010-08-16 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Noel Jones put forth on 8/16/2010 10:03 AM: > On 8/16/2010 9:36 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> Ram put forth on 8/16/2010 8:19 AM: >> >>> But Enterprise quality SSD's are so expensive. I can get an additional >>> server and still save money. >> >> I call BS: >> >> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product

Configuring internal mail relay

2010-08-16 Thread Michael.Larsen
I need to implement a relay on a test network that will discard all mail destined for corporate email addresses _except_ the corporate email addresses that are explicitly allowed. The reason is that my test network is subject to quotas, and I have to throttle the traffic through the corporate em

Re: Problem with Postfix and LDAP...

2010-08-16 Thread Christopher Koeber
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List < grkni...@scent-team.com> wrote: > On 8/16/2010 10:45 AM, Christopher Koeber wrote: > >> Well, maybe it will help to describe what I am trying to do. >> >> I have a list of folks in my OpenLDAP server that I would like accounts >> for.

Re: Speed up queue injection

2010-08-16 Thread Wietse Venema
Stan Hoeppner: > Google uses less than 1/10th of 1% "Enterprise grade" hardware, using the > typical definition of "Enterprise grade", in their operations. And Google is > the undisputed single largest operator of servers on the planet. I think that > qualifies them as an "Enterprise". ;) Indeed

Re: Problem with Postfix and LDAP...

2010-08-16 Thread Brian Evans - Postfix List
On 8/16/2010 3:40 PM, Christopher Koeber wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List mailto:grkni...@scent-team.com>> wrote: On 8/16/2010 10:45 AM, Christopher Koeber wrote: Well, maybe it will help to describe what I am trying to do. I have a list

Re: Active Directory and virtual delivery agent

2010-08-16 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 08/16/2010 11:24 AM, Aaron Roberts wrote: -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Jeroen Geilman Sent: 15 August 2010 20:54 To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Active Directory and virtual delivery agent On

Re: Active Directory and virtual delivery agent

2010-08-16 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 08/16/2010 01:52 PM, Aaron Roberts wrote: -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of zhong ming wu Sent: 16 August 2010 12:02 To: Postfix users Subject: Re: Active Directory and virtual delivery agent On Fri, Aug 13,

Re: Configuring internal mail relay

2010-08-16 Thread Noel Jones
On 8/16/2010 1:54 PM, michael.lar...@wellsfargo.com wrote: I need to implement a relay on a test network that will discard all mail destined for corporate email addresses _/except//_/ the corporate email addresses that are explicitly allowed. The reason is that my test network is subject to quota

Multiple instances and amavisd-new integration

2010-08-16 Thread Alex
Hi, I'm trying to get postfix-2.5.5 and amavisd-new-2.3.3 working together with two postfix instances, /etc/postfix and /etc/postfix-out. I'm receiving the following error: Aug 16 18:05:05 smtp01 postfix/error[1655]: 07C7335815B: to=, relay=none, delay=1152, delays=1152/0.07/0/0.02, dsn=4.3.0, st

Re: Multiple instances and amavisd-new integration

2010-08-16 Thread Noel Jones
On 8/16/2010 5:28 PM, Alex wrote: Hi, I'm trying to get postfix-2.5.5 and amavisd-new-2.3.3 working together with two postfix instances, /etc/postfix and /etc/postfix-out. I'm receiving the following error: Aug 16 18:05:05 smtp01 postfix/error[1655]: 07C7335815B: to=, relay=none, delay=1152, de

Re: Configuring internal mail relay

2010-08-16 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Noel Jones put forth on 8/16/2010 4:46 PM: > Move reject_unauth_destination to below your white/black lists. Thanks for the quick advice for Michael, Noel. I should have thought of this, however I didn't realize until asking Michael to bring this thread back on list that he was dealing with all

Re: Speed up queue injection

2010-08-16 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Wietse Venema put forth on 8/16/2010 2:36 PM: > Stan Hoeppner: >> Google uses less than 1/10th of 1% "Enterprise grade" hardware, using the >> typical definition of "Enterprise grade", in their operations. And Google is >> the undisputed single largest operator of servers on the planet. I think

Re: Multiple instances and amavisd-new integration

2010-08-16 Thread Alex
Hi, > If you tell the first instance to send to smtp-amavis:, it needs to know > what that means.  Make sure to define smtp-amavis in the first instance > master.cf Looks like that was the change I needed. I now understand, thanks. > Your logging will be a lot easier to read if you use syslog_na

Re: Speed up queue injection

2010-08-16 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Stan Hoeppner put forth on 8/16/2010 6:56 PM: > Wietse Venema put forth on 8/16/2010 2:36 PM: >> Stan Hoeppner: >>> Google uses less than 1/10th of 1% "Enterprise grade" hardware, using the >>> typical definition of "Enterprise grade", in their operations. And Google >>> is >>> the undisputed sin

Relay access denied: simple question

2010-08-16 Thread Alberto Lepe
Hello! One of the mail users have problems sending mails to other domains. Looking at the logs, they display: Aug 17 09:49:55 mail postfix/smtpd[24050]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from *. technowave.ne.jp[210.150.98.251]: 554 5.7.1 : Relay access denied; from= to= proto=SMTP helo= (real emails ar

Re: Relay access denied: simple question

2010-08-16 Thread Matt Hayes
On 08/16/2010 10:44 PM, Alberto Lepe wrote: Hello! One of the mail users have problems sending mails to other domains. Looking at the logs, they display: Aug 17 09:49:55 mail postfix/smtpd[24050]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from *.technowave.ne.jp [210.150.98.251]: 554

[SOLVED] Re: Relay access denied: simple question

2010-08-16 Thread Alberto Lepe
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Matt Hayes wrote: > > > On 08/16/2010 10:44 PM, Alberto Lepe wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> One of the mail users have problems sending mails to other domains. >> Looking at the logs, they display: >> >> Aug 17 09:49:55 mail postfix/smtpd[24050]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT f

specify local and non local destination

2010-08-16 Thread Alfred Tuinman
Hi, If we specify mydestination to be $mydomain all mail is considered local. This is fine for most of us but there are a few roaming users. Only for those users we would like all mail to be sent outside. How do I handle this? Regards, Alfred

Re: Configuring internal mail relay

2010-08-16 Thread Bjørn Ruberg
On 08/17/2010 01:45 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Noel Jones put forth on 8/16/2010 4:46 PM: Move reject_unauth_destination to below your white/black lists. Thanks for the quick advice for Michael, Noel. I should have thought of this, however I didn't realize until asking Michael to bring this th