On 08/01/2010 04:11 AM, Mike Morris wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on a mail server deployment that will only have one server
for MX and SASL submission purposes. Generally I like to have separate
Postfix instances to handle a specific task.
Why ?
It's totally useless in this case.
SMTP runs on port
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Stan Hoeppner
> Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 3:50 AM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Log file checking
>
> Mark Scholten put forth on 7/31/2010 6:53 PM:
>
Mike Morris:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on a mail server deployment that will only have one server
> for MX and SASL submission purposes. Generally I like to have separate
> Postfix instances to handle a specific task. In this case I'm running
> in to problems when the submission instance uses the sa
Hi folks,
In pseudo code here's how I want my outside mail exchange system to
behave:
if mail_sent_by_outside_host_to_inside_user
then
relay_to_inside_user
elsif
mail_sent_by_inside_host_to_inside_user
then
relay_t
On Sunday, August 01, 2010 at 19:15 CEST,
"Peter L. Berghold" wrote:
> In pseudo code here's how I want my outside mail exchange system to
> behave:
>
> if mail_sent_by_outside_host_to_inside_user
> then
> relay_to_inside_user
> elsif
> mail_sent
Peter L. Berghold:
> Hi folks,
>
> In pseudo code here's how I want my outside mail exchange system to
> behave:
>
On the Postfix server:
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks
permit_sasl_authenticated <- for the roaming laptop
...
On 01/08/10 18:56, Wietse Venema wrote:
and perhaps TLS encryption (to protect the login
Do not underestimate the importance of enabling TLS :)
Mark Scholten put forth on 8/1/2010 5:46 AM:
> Getting it in a single number is important for me, however looking at the
> http://logreporters.sourceforge.net/ link you did give I see that all but
> one thing is given the way I want it. This last option isn't given the way I
> like it, but that ca
On 08/01/2010 02:37 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 08/01/2010 04:11 AM, Mike Morris wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm working on a mail server deployment that will only have one server
>> for MX and SASL submission purposes. Generally I like to have separate
>> Postfix instances to handle a specific task.
>
On 08/01/2010 09:29 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Mike Morris:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm working on a mail server deployment that will only have one server
>> for MX and SASL submission purposes. Generally I like to have separate
>> Postfix instances to handle a specific task. In this case I'm running
>> in
Halo,
I have question about rejection.
Some unknown hostnames get 4.x.x defer, others get 5xx, I would like all
blocks at 5.x.x, yes, I know consequences of this, I run mail servers
(sendmail) for 15 years, now we move to postfix for mysql management of
company email I have problem replicate send
This warning does not make any sense at all since there is no such thing listed
in mydestination. Any ideas?
postfix/trivial-rewrite[7525]: warning: do not list domain mx.asda.gr in BOTH
mydestination and virtual_mailbox_domains
# postconf | grep mydest
mydestination = localhost.asda.gr, localh
Mike Morris:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> On 08/01/2010 09:29 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Mike Morris:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm working on a mail server deployment that will only have one server
> >> for MX and SASL submission purposes. Generally I like to have separate
> >>
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Edward avanti wrote:
>
>
>
>
> In 4.x.x above me, the sender are known to us, his hostname presented
> exist, but no PTR RR (he is get fixed but take time), it is we prefer to
> 5xx, so he and others like him not wait 5 days to find mail never went, I
> was think
14 matches
Mail list logo
