Log file checking

2010-07-31 Thread Mark Scholten
Hello, I am looking for a solution to get the following information from postfix: - Ignore connections from 127.0.0.1 or process only connections from 127.0.0.1 (with another flag/option set) - What is done with the connection (mail accepted/mail rejected (if rejected what was the reason, for exam

Re: Log file checking

2010-07-31 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 07/31/2010 02:15 PM, Mark Scholten wrote: Hello, I am looking for a solution to get the following information from postfix: - Ignore connections from 127.0.0.1 or process only connections from 127.0.0.1 (with another flag/option set) - What is done with the connection (mail accepted/mail reje

routing all mails to customized processor, without individual mail directory

2010-07-31 Thread Zhou, Yan
Hi there, We are intergrating Postfix with a J2EE backend, where all user accounts and configuration are in J2EE layer with database. Because of this architecture, we do not want to having to maintain individual user mail directory, or user account. In other words, if we add a new email addres

RE: routing all mails to customized processor, without individual mail directory

2010-07-31 Thread Zhou, Yan
The error is gone after I set local_recipient_maps = But relay is not happening, it still goes to local delivery agent. Cannot find why ... Jul 31 13:52:07 mustang postfix/local[18709]: 512DC150238: to=, relay=local, delay=0.16

Re: starttls testing

2010-07-31 Thread Magnus Bäck
On Friday, July 30, 2010 at 19:47 CEST, donovan jeffrey j wrote: [...] > There is no smtpd.conf that defines what SASL should do for Postfix. > SMTP AUTH can't work! This is bad. http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#server_sasl Apple has patched Postfix so you may need to read the App

Re: routing all mails to customized processor, without individual mail directory

2010-07-31 Thread Magnus Bäck
On Saturday, July 31, 2010 at 15:58 CEST, "Zhou, Yan" wrote: > The error is gone after I set local_recipient_maps > = Don't do that. Postfix must know which recipient addresses are valid. Luckily Postfix supports a number of l

Re: starttls testing

2010-07-31 Thread donovan jeffrey j
On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Magnus Bäck wrote: > On Friday, July 30, 2010 at 19:47 CEST, > donovan jeffrey j wrote: > > [...] > >> There is no smtpd.conf that defines what SASL should do for Postfix. >> SMTP AUTH can't work! > > This is bad. > > http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#

RE: Log file checking

2010-07-31 Thread Mark Scholten
> -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- > us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Jeroen Geilman > Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2010 3:16 PM > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: Log file checking > > On 07/31/2010 02:15 PM, Mark Scholten wrote: >

Re: starttls testing

2010-07-31 Thread Magnus Bäck
On Saturday, July 31, 2010 at 17:46 CEST, donovan jeffrey j wrote: > this is an older 10.4 machine. I just tested it with a 10.4.11 I just > enabled their gui for smtpd Auth > the result matched my config but i recieevd the same test results; > > client side starttls it just sits and waits.

RE: routing all mails to customized processor, without individual mail directory

2010-07-31 Thread Zhou, Yan
Thanks to all, having "connector:" did fix the problem! I also made a couple of other configuration changes, but these are minor. Yan Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic transmission is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended only for

Re: Log file checking

2010-07-31 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Mark Scholten put forth on 7/31/2010 11:00 AM: > Any ideas if there are ready to use scripts for this part? If you give us your exact requirement, instead of the vague "I want to get certain information", one of us might be able to hack up a simple shell script, or even a single bash line, to do

RE: Log file checking

2010-07-31 Thread Mark Scholten
> -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- > us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Stan Hoeppner > Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 12:26 AM > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: Log file checking > > Mark Scholten put forth on 7/31/2010 11:00 AM:

Re: Log file checking

2010-07-31 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 01:53:42 +0200, Mark Scholten wrote: > I want the following information (per day or per hour, it should be possible > to exclude email addresses or to only get information for certain email > addresses): > - Number of email attempts made by other systems > - Number of message

Re: Log file checking

2010-07-31 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Mark Scholten put forth on 7/31/2010 6:53 PM: > I want the following information (per day or per hour, it should be possible > to exclude email addresses or to only get information for certain email > addresses): /usr/sbin/pflogsumm.pl --smtpd_stats /var/log/mail.log /var/log/mail.log.1 Grand To

Separate Submission Instance on Same IP as MX

2010-07-31 Thread Mike Morris
Hi, I'm working on a mail server deployment that will only have one server for MX and SASL submission purposes. Generally I like to have separate Postfix instances to handle a specific task. In this case I'm running in to problems when the submission instance uses the same IP address as the MX i