Keld Simonsen:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 11:33:02AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > I checked out a few details, and the result is that turning on
> > VERP, before sending to a mailing list alias, does not turn on VERP
> > when delivering to the mem
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 02:15:53AM +0200, Fran Garcia wrote:
> Basically the schema should :
>
> - Be OpenLDAP compatible
Not a problem.
> - Allow multidomain
I don't know what this means.
> - Host transports for each defined account / email address.
This is not a good idea. Avoid using LDAP
I've been watching this for a while and still not sure what could be
causing it it or if its a known issue, but thought I'd pass it along
here on the mailing list to see whatever one else thought.
I use recipient_bcc_maps to bcc email to my personal account to Gmail.
recipient_bcc contents:
-
On 7/6/2010 10:11 AM, Matt Hayes wrote:
> I've been watching this for a while and still not sure what could be
> causing it it or if its a known issue, but thought I'd pass it along
> here on the mailing list to see whatever one else thought.
>
Crap, forgot to add this in, my apologies!
mail_ve
This site uses LDAP for postfix/dovecot administration since about ten
years.
We use qmailControl.schema (to define the domains, which are accepted at
this site) and qmail.schema (to define the mailboxes whithin these
domains).
suomi
On 2010-07-06 15:58, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Sat, Jul 03
I'm doing a custom install, and one of the packages in the install is postfix.
Each time, it prompts me to select "no configuration" "Local use" etc.
just after the package has been downloaded and right before it has
been installed. (similar to the screen that shows up when you're asked
to accept t
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 10:11:27AM -0400, Matt Hayes wrote:
> I've been watching this for a while and still not sure what could be
> causing it it or if its a known issue, but thought I'd pass it along
> here on the mailing list to see whatever one else thought.
>
> I use recipient_bcc_maps to bc
On 7/6/2010 10:43 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 10:11:27AM -0400, Matt Hayes wrote:
>
>> I've been watching this for a while and still not sure what could be
>> causing it it or if its a known issue, but thought I'd pass it along
>> here on the mailing list to see whatever o
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 05:27:25PM +0300, Isaac Witmer wrote:
> I'm doing a custom install, and one of the packages in the install is postfix.
> Each time, it prompts me to select "no configuration" "Local use" etc.
> just after the package has been downloaded and right before it has
> been instal
Could you point me to the specific list you're referring to?
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 05:27:25PM +0300, Isaac Witmer wrote:
>
>> I'm doing a custom install, and one of the packages in the install is
>> postfix.
>> Each time, it prompts me t
google "debian forums" match your issue with the closest forum category
and post the question there.
-J
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Isaac Witmer wrote:
> Could you point me to the specific list you're referring to?
>
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Victor Duchovni
> wrote:
> > On Tue,
On 07/03/2010 01:27 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 02:53:44PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Morten P.D. Stevens put forth on 7/3/2010 2:40 PM:
Does anyone know backported Postfix 2.6.x or 2.7.x RPM packages
for RHEL5?
This binary rpm is for x86-64 only:
http://ftp.wl0.org/officia
Hi
I want to rewrite "From filed" from header,but only when To: Field is only
numeric (fax type)
It is:
If To: nume...@domain.tld then
From replace with f...@mydomain.tld
Endif
It is possible (Canical?)
Thanks
Gaby
Isaac Witmer wrote:
> Could you point me to the specific list you're referring to?
A good catchall is debian-u...@lists.debian.org where general
discussion takes place.
Bob
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:01:53 -0700, "Roderick A. Anderson"
> Love to -- plus I'm dealing with not-64 bit machines -- but I can't find
> a RPM for tinycdb I feel comfortable with. All were circa 2002. Is
> this OK? What are others using?
>
>
> \\||/
> Rod
http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/tinycdb.h
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 07:03:14PM +0300, Gaby L / AutoGlobus2000 SRL wrote:
> I want to rewrite "From filed" from header,but only when To: Field
> is only numeric (fax type)
> It is:
> If To: nume...@domain.tld then
> From replace with f...@mydomain.tld
> Endif
Only via external content
On 07/06/2010 09:07 AM, Bas Mevissen wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:01:53 -0700, "Roderick A. Anderson"
Love to -- plus I'm dealing with not-64 bit machines -- but I can't find
a RPM for tinycdb I feel comfortable with. All were circa 2002. Is
this OK? What are others using?
\\||/
Rod
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 12:14, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 07:03:14PM +0300, Gaby L / AutoGlobus2000 SRL wrote:
>
>> I want to rewrite "From filed" from header,but only when To: Field
>> is only numeric (fax type)
>> It is:
>> If To: nume...@domain.tld then
>> From repla
Isaac Witmer put forth on 7/6/2010 9:27 AM:
> I'm doing a custom install, and one of the packages in the install is postfix.
> Each time, it prompts me to select "no configuration" "Local use" etc.
> just after the package has been downloaded and right before it has
> been installed. (similar to th
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:27, Isaac Witmer wrote:
> I'm doing a custom install, and one of the packages in the install is postfix.
> Each time, it prompts me to select "no configuration" "Local use" etc.
> just after the package has been downloaded and right before it has
> been installed. (simila
06.07.2010 20:58, Phil Howard wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:27, Isaac Witmer wrote:
>> I'm doing a custom install, and one of the packages in the install is
>> postfix.
>> Each time, it prompts me to select "no configuration" "Local use" etc.
>> just after the package has been downloaded and
On 06/30/2010 11:17 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
When sending mail via SMTP, Postfix randomizes the order of
equal-preference server IP addresses.
However, with SMTP connection caching enabled, the faster SMTP
server will get more mail than the slower SMTP server.
It seems you imply that disabling
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 11:21:19AM -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
> On 06/30/2010 11:17 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> When sending mail via SMTP, Postfix randomizes the order of
>> equal-preference server IP addresses.
>>
>> However, with SMTP connection caching enabled, the faster SMTP
>> server will
On 07/06/2010 11:30 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
No, disabling the cache will still leave a skewed distribution. Connection
creation is uniform across the servers, but connection lifetime is much
longer on the slow server, so its connection concurrency is much higher
(potentially equal to the dest
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 12:10:41PM -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
> I realize that email delivery is not a trivial problem, but it seems
> baffling that a seemingly simple task ("fair" volume-based load balancing
> between transports) is so hard to achieve.
If you want to deliver the same number o
I have now went through my config so I will post it if needed. What
I'm facing now is spam that looks normal. Looks like a reject but is
not in some cases. The problem is that since these e-mails are
delivered to the user account. I really don't have an example to post
from the q. I use pos
On 07/06/2010 12:27 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
If you want to deliver the same number of messages to each server,
regardless of server performance, (message-count fairness, rather than
concurrency fairness), and suffer high latency when a slow server starts
to impede message flow, then turning o
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 01:00:14PM -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Having multiple exit points seems to improve the overall delivery speed -
> this is true even right now, when distribution is skewed to the faster
> server 4:1. My estimate is, a near-1:1 distribution would actually fix our
> time
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 16:10, Josh Cason wrote:
> I have now went through my config so I will post it if needed. What I'm
> facing now is spam that looks normal. Looks like a reject but is not in some
> cases. The problem is that since these e-mails are delivered to the user
> account. I really do
I'm sorry,
Was my question unclear? Or just too ridiculously simple for this group?
I think I may be able to figure out the allowed relay part... But I'm just
looking for some reassurance that I'm not going to disrupt the existing
Mailman List Manager already running on this system. The outbound
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 04:31:21PM -0400, Jeff Bernier wrote:
> I'm sorry,
>
> Was my question unclear? Or just too ridiculously simple for this group?
Neither, it was too general. You need to ask more specific questions.
> > My question is... Can this be easily done without disturbing Mailman
No the message is different. Like this time around they look like this:
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Delivery to the following recipients failed.
authentical...@raisley.com
Final-Recipient: rfc958;authentical...@raisley.com
Action: failed
Status: 1.2.0
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 15:58, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 02:15:53AM +0200, Fran Garcia wrote:
>
>> Basically the schema should :
>>
>> - Be OpenLDAP compatible
>
> Not a problem.
>
>> - Allow multidomain
>
> I don't know what this means.
Hi Viktor, thanks for your reply.
Thi
On 07/06/2010 04:22 PM, Fran Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 15:58, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 02:15:53AM +0200, Fran Garcia wrote:
FWITW, I've used this as a reference in the past. After you build a few of
these systems, They become quite easy.
http://phamm.org/
On 7/6/2010 4:51 PM, Josh Cason wrote:
No the message is different. Like this time around they look
like this:
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Delivery to the following recipients failed.
authentical...@raisley.com
Final-Recipient: rfc958;authentical...@raisle
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 11:22:47PM +0200, Fran Garcia wrote:
> >> - Allow multidomain
> >
> > I don't know what this means.
>
> Hi Viktor, thanks for your reply.
>
> This means "be able to hold several virtual domains as destination".
> Think of an ISP configuring a shared email platform for sev
junkyardma...@verizon.net a écrit :
> Yahoo has ulterior motives? They wish to push their domain keys.
> Others probably likewise have ulterior motives.
> Do you also oppose SPF, and if so what is your motives?
I will repeat myself: this is not the place to discuss SPF. SPF has been
debated to d
didn't see Wietse message before sending. so please ignore my previous
post. (sigh, there is no "get my post back" in email :).
mouss a écrit :
> junkyardma...@verizon.net a écrit :
>> Yahoo has ulterior motives? They wish to push their domain keys.
>> Others probably likewise have ulterior mot
Josh Cason a écrit :
> I have now went through my config so I will post it if needed. What I'm
> facing now is spam that looks normal. Looks like a reject but is not in
> some cases. The problem is that since these e-mails are delivered to the
> user account. I really don't have an example to post
Thanks Bob. I wasn't sure if Victor had a specific list in mind.
It's not as if this is the first place I came.
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Isaac Witmer wrote:
>> Could you point me to the specific list you're referring to?
>
> A good catchall is debian-u...@lists.debian.
I would like to apologize for hijacking this mailing list, I didn't
realize it would be quite so off topic. I was having trouble finding
the answer in all the usual places.
After almost writing a response, I've almost found the answer (haven't
tested it yet) by searching for:
postfix debconf-set-s
41 matches
Mail list logo
