Hello,
I have my postfix set up as a TLS client to other smtp servers. I
point smtp_tls_CApath to a directory where I store my own imported
trusted CAs. My question is whether or not Postfix will also load the
Root CAs stored in /etc/ssl/certs. If not, does it mean that I have to
set smtp_tls_CApat
Hi,
Hopefully someone on this list can help me out. I am trying to set up
mime-header checking to only allow through emails with a particular file
extension, that is I want to block any email without this attachment type or
any other attachment type.
I have created the map file with postmap an
Hi,
I am using postfix + MailScanner + Mailwatch, Everything is working fine.
postfix is relaying emails for all of my clients/domain, but I am unable to
telnet localhost 25. Although I have allowed 127.0.0.0/8 range, listening on
all interfaces, and is sending emails for all customer as per d
On Tuesday 08 June 2010 12:04:36 Ockleford Paul (NHS Connecting for Health)
wrote:
> I would be grateful if anybody is able to offer some assistance.
>
> mime_header_checks
>
> #!/^\s*Content-(Disposition|Type).*name\s*=\s*"{1,1}.+\.(ecf)"{1,1}\s*$/!/n
>ame=[^>]*\.(ecf)/ WARN Would normally reject
On Tuesday 08 June 2010 13:09:02 Khawaja M. Jawad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using postfix + MailScanner + Mailwatch, Everything is working fine.
> postfix is relaying emails for all of my clients/domain, but I am unable to
> telnet localhost 25. Although I have allowed 127.0.0.0/8 range, listening
>
Hi,
Thanks for the response, what I want to do is only allow one type of attachment
through though. I have a service which processes attachments, so rather than
give a list of disallowed attachments, I want to do the opposite and only give
a list of allowed attachments. In this case only emails
Ockleford Paul (NHS Connecting for Health):
> Hi,
>
> Hopefully someone on this list can help me out. I am trying to
> set up mime-header checking to only allow through emails with a
> particular file extension, that is I want to block any email
> without this attachment type or any other attachme
Ok thanks, I'm not sure I completely understand the syntax of the perl reg ex.
Do you know why even testing the example I was sent through this user list it
still applies the reg ex to other mime headers? I understood that this
expression was tested in production by users but when I look in my m
Ockleford Paul (NHS Connecting for Health):
> Ok thanks, I'm not sure I completely understand the syntax of the perl reg ex.
>
> Do you know why even testing the example I was sent through this
> user list it still applies the reg ex to other mime headers? I
> understood that this expression was t
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 18:31, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010, Dan Burkland wrote:
>
>> Relevant configuration entries:
>>
>> ---main.cf
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination
> ^
>
>> ---master.cf---
>> submissio
I could, but where as you may use a piece of code or an expression you don't
fully understand I wouldn't. I would rather use tax payers money getting a
working solution I understand than copy and pasting some crap someone online
wrote which as they state is UNTESTED.
Thanks all the same
-O
On 8-Jun-2010, at 05:51, Ockleford Paul (NHS Connecting for Health) wrote:
>
> Thanks for the response, what I want to do is only allow one type of
> attachment through though. I have a service which processes attachments, so
> rather than give a list of disallowed attachments, I want to do the
On 8-Jun-2010, at 07:08, Ockleford Paul (NHS Connecting for Health) wrote:
>
> I could, but where as you may use a piece of code or an expression you don't
> fully understand I wouldn't. I would rather use tax payers money getting a
> working solution I understand than copy and pasting some crap
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Phil Howard wrote:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 18:31, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010, Dan Burkland wrote:
Relevant configuration entries:
---main.cf
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination
^
---mas
On 6/8/2010 8:08 AM, Ockleford Paul (NHS Connecting for
Health) wrote:
I could, but where as you may use a piece of code or an expression you don't
fully understand I wouldn't. I would rather use tax payers money getting a
working solution I understand than copy and pasting some crap someone on
An on-line version of this announcement is available at
http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.7.1.html
Postfix stable release 2.7.1 fixes one defect in the XFORWARD
implementation (for SMTP-based content filters), improves robustness,
and has updates for changes in system or library inter
An on-line version of this announcement is available at
http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.6.7.html
Postfix legacy release 2.6.7 contains fixes that are also included
with Postfix 2.7 (stable release) and Postfix 2.8 (experimental
release).
NOTE: Postfix versions 2.3 and earlier are n
Hello all, I've got a dilly of a pickle for you. Running
postfix-2.5.6-1.fc9.i386 on Fedora 9.
I do a simple telnet session on one windows computer and it works, I do the
exact same thing on the other windows computer and it does not work. Both
run Windows XP SP3 updated to latest as of 2010-06-07
Using all of your helpful suggestions I was able to properly configure my
Postfix server. The purpose behind master.cf makes a bit more sense now after
reading your replies. Thanks again!
Dan
Michael Northcott:
> 354 Start mail input; end with .
That is not Postfix. Perhaps you are talking to some antivirus software.
The Postfix response is: "354 End data with .".
Wietse
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 09:31:46AM +0200, Jan C. wrote:
> I have my postfix set up as a TLS client to other smtp servers. I
> point smtp_tls_CApath to a directory where I store my own imported
> trusted CAs. My question is whether or not Postfix will also load the
> Root CAs stored in /etc/ssl/cer
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 09:47, Larry Stone wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Phil Howard wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 18:31, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010, Dan Burkland wrote:
>>>
Relevant configuration entries:
---main.cf
smtpd_recipient_restrict
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Phil Howard wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 09:47, Larry Stone wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Phil Howard wrote:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 18:31, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010, Dan Burkland wrote:
Relevant configuration entries:
---main.cf
smtpd_recipie
Aha! Thanks, that explains a lot. I thought I turned off the mail filtering
but I guess not. So this "security" program must be mangling all SMTP
sessions that do not look like Outlook - what a great "solution".
This seems consistent with the overall poor quality of the rest of the
security suite
Hello,
I have set up a postfix(2.6.6) mail receiving server (customized with three
milters (dkim,sid, custom java milter) and two content filters (amavisd, custom
java based)).
Is it possible that if someone sends a mail for my postfix and it gets received
in a manner that duplicate mails get
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 13:06, Larry Stone wrote:
> And did you even read what I wrote? I am well aware you made a typo earlier.
> I understand what you meant and said nothing about the mistake.
I think this is a case of users being mixed up. I did not make the
typo ... Dan did. I reported the
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Phil Howard wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 13:06, Larry Stone wrote:
And did you even read what I wrote? I am well aware you made a typo earlier.
I understand what you meant and said nothing about the mistake.
I think this is a case of users being mixed up. I did not mak
Hello,
I have set up a postfix(2.6.6) mail receiving server (customized with three
milters (dkim,sid, custom java milter) and two content filters (amavisd, custom
java based)).
Is it possible that if someone sends a mail for my postfix and it gets received
in a manner that duplicate mails ge
Hi,
I am using postfix + MailScanner + Mailwatch, Everything is working
fine... postfix is relaying emails for all of my clients/domain, but I
am unable to telnet localhost 25. Although I have allowed 127.0.0.0/8
range, listening on all interfaces, and is sending emails for all
customer as
Sharma, Ashish:
> Is it possible that if someone sends a mail for my postfix and it
> gets received in a manner that duplicate mails get generated on
> my side?
Yes.
> In what circumstances is it possible and what kind of remedies if
> any I can put in place to avoid such a thing.
There are mult
Thanks for the answer over a silly question J.Roeleveld.
It was a firewall issue, I added rule for localhost to connect at port 25.
Issue is resolved.
--
Jawad
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Beha
Noel Jones put forth on 6/8/2010 8:58 AM:
> and while I've never met anyone named Wietse, I seem to remember seeing
> that name in the postfix copyright statement. His advice might be worth
> paying attention to.
https://researcher.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-wietse
http://en.wikipedia
On Wednesday 09 June 2010 06:39:16 Khawaja M. Jawad wrote:
> Thanks for the answer over a silly question J.Roeleveld.
There are no silly/stupid questions, only silly/stupid answers :)
> It was a firewall issue, I added rule for localhost to connect at port 25.
> Issue is resolved.
Even though I
33 matches
Mail list logo
