Hey All,
I have a user trying to send an email however it was bounced back. After
checking the maillog, I found that it was timing out when sending "RCPT TO".
I telnet'ed into the recipients server and started sending the series of
commands to send mail and it seemed very quick up until I sent RCP
Hi, all
I'm blocking the communication from MUA to MTA from port 25/tcp,
doing that only through from ports 587/tcp and 465/tcp
But my box Postfix provides mail services to many domains and I created
a only SSL certificate with the name server as Common Name.
And I get many warnings because t
Eduardo J?nior:
> Hi, all
>
>
> I'm blocking the communication from MUA to MTA from port 25/tcp,
> doing that only through from ports 587/tcp and 465/tcp
>
>
> But my box Postfix provides mail services to many domains and I created
> a only SSL certificate with the name server as Common Name.
>
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 10:20:56AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Common Name: myserver.domain.com
> > MX for domain1: smtp.domain1.com
> > MX for domain2: smtp.domain2.com
> >
> > Then, how i configure SSL Certificates per domain on Postfix?
> > References?
>
> How would Postfix know what cert
i test the command today, and found out that it only takes 1.5 secs, nothing
change from the 5 secs result. I add the 192.168.1.10 to my /etc/hosts file,
and it drop to 0.5 secs to inject 100 msgs.
1. Question here, if the sender IP is not in my /etc/hosts, will postfix do
a reverse lookup on the
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:20:56 +0200, Wietse Venema
wrote:
Eduardo Júnior:
But my box Postfix provides mail services to many domains and I created
a only SSL certificate with the name server as Common Name.
And I get many warnings because the Common Name in the certificate
doesn't match
Teh Kim Chooi:
> i test the command today, and found out that it only takes 1.5 secs, nothing
> change from the 5 secs result. I add the 192.168.1.10 to my /etc/hosts file,
> and it drop to 0.5 secs to inject 100 msgs.
No surprise.
> 1. Question here, if the sender IP is not in my /etc/hosts, wil
On 6/1/2010 9:01 AM, Kaleb Hosie wrote:
Hey All,
I have a user trying to send an email however it was bounced back. After
checking the maillog, I found that it was timing out when sending "RCPT TO".
I telnet'ed into the recipients server and started sending the series of
commands to send mail an
On 06/01/2010 10:00 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 10:20:56AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>>> Common Name: myserver.domain.com
>>> MX for domain1: smtp.domain1.com
>>> MX for domain2: smtp.domain2.com
>>>
>>> Then, how i configure SSL Certificates per domain on Postfix?
>>>
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:23:38PM -0500, Terry Inzauro wrote:
> > Even with SNI support, most SMTP clients will not make use of SNI, so
> > it will take a long time before SMTP STARTTLS servers can expect to
> > support multiple certificates for most clients.
> >
>
> Could this be a case where
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:23:38PM -0500, Terry Inzauro wrote:
> Could this be a case where it makes sense to run multiple
> instances of postfix which bind to different IP's and are each
> configured with unique certs?
They don't need to be separate instances, possibly just separate
smtpd(8) li
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:42:06PM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> Is SNI defined for SMTP yet? A quick Google search didn't find it.
> How would that work? The client would have to tell the hostname or
> domain name wanted before the STARTTLS?
SNI works entirely within SSL, the desired hostname is s
Hello,
I'm new to the list, but I've been searching the manuals, how-to's, mail
archives, google, etc trying to find the answer to this quesiton.
I have the following setup.
Postfix 2.6.5
Amavisd-new 2.6.3
Spamassassin 3.2.5
clamav 0.96
dbmail 2.2.9
The entire set up works, amavis is a memory
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 02:09:23PM -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote:
> I have in the main.cf
>
> relay_domains= < a couple of domains> mysql:/etc/postfix/transport.cf
> transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/transport.cf
Don't use the transport table directly as a relay domain table, some day
you'll ne
On 6/1/2010 2:22 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 02:09:23PM -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote:
I have in the main.cf
relay_domains=< a couple of domains> mysql:/etc/postfix/transport.cf
transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/transport.cf
Don't use the transport table d
I've recently enabled Ephemeral Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (EECDH)
key exchange on our inbound Postfix servers (Postfix compliled and linked
with OpenSSL 1.0.0), by setting:
smtpd_tls_eecdh_grade = strong
Counting recently logged ciphers yields:
33258 DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA
131
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jack Browning:
>> I'm curious as to why the generic map isn't working for mail sent to
>> the relayhost.
>
> Generic mapping is implemented in the Postfix SMTP client, so you
> need to configure the Postfix SMTP client appropriately. Setting
On 6/1/2010 3:08 PM, Jack Browning wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jack Browning:
I'm curious as to why the generic map isn't working for mail sent to
the relayhost.
Generic mapping is implemented in the Postfix SMTP client, so you
need to configure the Postfix S
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> Add a password map entry for the local unwritten address.
Wow. That's all it took. Case closed.
I will try and decipher why that worked off-list.
Thanks, man.
JEB
I just uploaded new versions of Postfix 2.8-20100601 "experimental"
and a release candidate for Postfix 2.7.1 "stable".
Both versions have the same fixes/workarounds for incompatible
changes in MacOS 10.6, OpenSSL 1.0.0, and Berkeley DB 5.0.21,
which were contributed from var
The virtual domain hosting stuff in the documentation is pretty confusing.
I haven't yet seen an example of what it is that I'm trying to
accomplish.
I have several domains that I have non-unix mailboxes (they are stored by
sql using an alternative lmtp daemon after running them through
amavisd-n
On 06/01/2010 08:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> I just uploaded new versions of Postfix 2.8-20100601 "experimental"
> and a release candidate for Postfix 2.7.1 "stable".
>
> Both versions have the same fixes/workarounds for incompatible
> changes in MacOS 1
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010, Matt Hayes wrote:
> On 06/01/2010 08:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > I just uploaded new versions of Postfix 2.8-20100601 "experimental"
> > and a release candidate for Postfix 2.7.1 "stable".
> >
> > Both versions have the same
On 06/01/2010 08:50 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Jun 2010, Matt Hayes wrote:
>
>> On 06/01/2010 08:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> I just uploaded new versions of Postfix 2.8-20100601 "experimental"
>>> and a release candidate for Postfix 2.7.1
Can I also assume that I would use relay_domains and relay_transport?
Correct?
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010, cur...@maurand.com wrote:
[ .. ]
> At Victor's urging, this afternoon, I enabled the relay_recipient_maps and
> that solved the rejecting unknown before the handoff to the amavisd-new,
> but broke the domains that I need to forward all mail for.
Explain what you mean by 'bro
> On Tue, 01 Jun 2010, cur...@maurand.com wrote:
>
> [ .. ]
>
>> At Victor's urging, this afternoon, I enabled the relay_recipient_maps
>> and
>> that solved the rejecting unknown before the handoff to the amavisd-new,
>> but broke the domains that I need to forward all mail for.
>
> Explain what y
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010, cur...@maurand.com wrote:
> > On Tue, 01 Jun 2010, cur...@maurand.com wrote:
> >
> > [ .. ]
> >
> >> At Victor's urging, this afternoon, I enabled the
> >> relay_recipient_maps and that solved the rejecting unknown before
> >> the handoff to the amavisd-new, but broke the doma
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jack Browning:
>> No address rewriting is occurring even though Postfix is invoking its
>> SMTP client to deliver the mail to the remote host, and my generic map
>> (after postmap and a reload) contains an entry like this:
>>
>> zzz...@jnjroo
29 matches
Mail list logo
