On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 14:19, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 5/13/2010 5:45 AM, Markus Schwengel wrote:
>>>
>>> please don't top-post.
>>>
>>> If you're using clamav-milter postfix will reject the mail with a
>>> milter-reject: log entry and no DSN is sent.
>>>
>>> So, what are you really doing?
>>> http
Josh Cason a écrit :
> I have three servers that need to send me e-mail. Two of the servers
> won't send say avast reports and what not. I get the following error
>
> From one server:
>
> warning: 71.39.113.15: address not listed for hostname sbs.rtgis.com
>
> From the other server:
>
> NOQUEU
Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez a écrit :
> [snip]
>
> I'd like to drop email if *any* of the following conditions are met:
> 1/ "X-Amavis-Alert" *contains* "INFECTED" or "BANNED"
> 2/ "X-Spam-Flag" *contains* "YES"
>
> Relating your 2nd question, perhaps it's not that easy. I'm currently
> sharing
On 2010-05-13 9:59 PM, Gary Smith wrote:
> Anyway, we are still receiving them. The firewall allows port 25
> incoming, everything outgoing but there is also some nat'ing going on
> because of the ipvsadm. Anyone ever seen this type of issue with
> this type of config?
Per the welcome message yo
Gary Smith:
> I've been getting a lost of "lost connection after DATA" this last
> week. On our low volume servers (that houses some minor clients)
> we are receiving 800/day. We switched over to ipvsadm about 3
> weeks ago and I though maybe it's because of non-persistent
> connections. So I re
On 5/14/10 3:19 AM, Markus Schwengel at markus.schwen...@googlemail.com
wrote:
>>> When a virus is found postfix sends a message like the one I posted
>>> earlier. Is this not a DSN generated by postfix? I'm confused...
>>
>>
>> We need to see log entries of an entire infected message transacti
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 13:44, Larry Stone wrote:
> On 5/14/10 3:19 AM, Markus Schwengel at markus.schwen...@googlemail.com
> wrote:
>
>
When a virus is found postfix sends a message like the one I posted
earlier. Is this not a DSN generated by postfix? I'm confused...
>>>
>>>
>>> We nee
Markus Schwengel:
>
> True, the message is generated locally. But this is exactly what I need.
>
> So the question remains the same: How can i tell postfix to not
> include the original message in the DSN or at least strip the
> attachment?
You can submit the message with "sendmail -N never" and
Take a écrit :
> Hello!
>
> I've been trying to figure out the best way to drop/sort spam with
> virtual users. All documentation I could find didn't fit to our virtual
> configuration and I'm a bit confused what's the best way to drop spam.
>
> Our setup is postfix+cyrus-imapd+spamassassin. User
> Take a écrit :
> > Hello!
> >
> > I've been trying to figure out the best way to drop/sort spam with
> > virtual users. All documentation I could find didn't fit to our
> > virtual configuration and I'm a bit confused what's the
> best way to drop spam.
> >
> > Our setup is postfix+cyrus-imapd
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 14:46, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Markus Schwengel:
>>
>> True, the message is generated locally. But this is exactly what I need.
>>
>> So the question remains the same: How can i tell postfix to not
>> include the original message in the DSN or at least strip the
>> attachmen
On 5/14/2010 7:08 AM, Markus Schwengel wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 13:44, Larry Stone wrote:
On 5/14/10 3:19 AM, Markus Schwengel at markus.schwen...@googlemail.com
wrote:
When a virus is found postfix sends a message like the one I posted
earlier. Is this not a DSN generated by postfix?
Noel Jones:
> > So the question remains the same: How can i tell postfix to not
> > include the original message in the DSN or at least strip the
> > attachment?
>
> This might help:
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#bounce_size_limit
>
> But for locally submitted mail it might be better t
Hi Wietse :
thanks for your advice ..
Kevin Chan
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Yikuo Chan:
> > I am curious about how many e-mail that has been received per session on
> my
> > postfix mail server , can I got those information from log files ? if not
> is
> > there
Hello All,
A client in my domain let's say domain.com is receiving lots of bounce mails
"backscatter" or "joe job" can I block all bounced mail to that specific
user u...@domain.com? I have the following check_headers but does not work
for me because it will block genuine email and mail server re
> Per the welcome message you received when you joined the list:
>
That would be like 5+ years ago. I've slept since then.
> TO REPORT A PROBLEM see:
> http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
>
> At a minimum, postfix version, output of postconf -n and unedited
> NON-verbose logs exhibit
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> To enable remote submission, provision a port 587 TLS encrypted
> submission service that offers AUTH PLAIN, and perhaps also GSSAPI
> if you are willing to expose a suitable KDC to the Internet and
> client software supports SMTP with GSS
Weitse,
For some reason, random mails from you pop up in my inbox, instead of my
postfix list instead delivery on behalf of postfix-users@postfix.org like most
others. Just an FYI
> If the NAT assumes that everything is a web client and drops
> connections after a few seconds, then Postfix wi
Hi:
Any one knows how i could configure a trusted relay host list on postfix ?
i just want permit specifics (don´t all one subnet) email servers IP's
uses my primary email server for relay email.
--
LCC Wilberth de Jesús Pérez Segura C
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 09:23:12AM -0700, Gary Smith wrote:
> I'm sure it's not a probable with postfix, I'm just looking for postfix
> cases where they have overcome this type of config issue.
Have you disabled window scaling on your Postfix server. Lost connections
are often the result of firew
> Have you disabled window scaling on your Postfix server. Lost connections
> are often the result of firewalls mangling "advanced" TCP features.
>
> - Disable window scaling
> - Disable ECN
>
I don't believe we have disabled any of the advanced features. That will give
me something to
Gary Smith:
> > If the NAT assumes that everything is a web client and drops
> > connections after a few seconds, then Postfix will report lost
> > connections.
> >
> > If the NAT keeps connections open but it is a crappy box that can
> > maintain state for only 100 connections, then it will be fo
Gary Smith:
> May 13 18:48:33 host01 postfix/smtpd[18110]: connect from sender[senderip]
> May 13 18:48:33 host01 postfix/smtpd[18110]: setting up TLS connection from
> sender[senderip]
> May 13 18:48:33 host01 postfix/smtpd[18110]: Anonymous TLS connection
> established from sender[senderip]: TL
mouss a écrit :
> Take a écrit :
>> Hello!
>>
>> I've been trying to figure out the best way to drop/sort spam with
>> virtual users. All documentation I could find didn't fit to our virtual
>> configuration and I'm a bit confused what's the best way to drop spam.
>>
>> Our setup is postfix+cyrus-i
On 5/14/2010 11:09 AM, motty.cruz wrote:
Hello All,
A client in my domain let’s say domain.com is receiving lots of bounce
mails “backscatter” or “joe job” can I block all bounced mail to that
specific user u...@domain.com?
Read this:
http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html
Then
Kaleb Hosie a écrit :
>> [snip]
>>
>
> What we have done in our organization is started Using SpamAssassin
> Quarantine. It runs SA as well as scans it for viruses. If it's detected as
> possible spam, it holds it in quarantine.
>
I see (at least) two problems:
- this forkes a perl program for e
Wilberth Pérez a écrit :
> Hi:
>
> Any one knows how i could configure a trusted relay host list on postfix ?
>
> i just want permit specifics (don´t all one subnet) email servers IP's
> uses my primary email server for relay email.
>
>
you can simply use mynetworks.
for example
mynetworks
> This strongly suggests that you have is a 10 second time limit
> on the life time of NAT/VPS/whatever state.
>
> Wietse
Makes complete sense. I will bounce it off the ipvsadm list. They don't tend
to respond much as of recent.
BTW, I did notice, while analyzing some of the logs, tha
Ok I am reading the document and will get back later tonight or late
Saturday.
dovecot.rar
Description: Binary data
main.rar
Description: Binary data
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:20:47AM -0700, Gary Smith wrote:
> May 13 04:08:33 host01 postfix/smtpd[10912]: lost connection after DATA from
> unknown[82.178.110.201]
Listed on SpamHaus XBL and PBL
> May 13 04:08:34 host01 postfix/smtpd[10409]: lost connection after RCPT from
> unknown[109.96.25
For a given virtual domain, I would like to send mail with a certain prefix to
another process (via pipe) while all other mail gets delivered normally.
Here are the (hopefully) relevant pieces of my various config files:
/etc/postfix/master.cf
list-expander unix - n n -
> > May 13 04:09:23 host01 postfix/smtpd[10301]: lost connection after RCPT from
> unknown[190.107.112.194]
>
> Listed on SpamHaus XBL
>
> Unless these listings postdate your log entries, you should probably
> not allow these clients to get as far as "DATA".
>
> reject_rbl_client zen.spamh
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 02:06:55PM -0600, David F. wrote:
> For a given virtual domain, I would like to send mail with a certain prefix
> to another process (via pipe) while all other mail gets delivered normally.
>
> Here are the (hopefully) relevant pieces of my various config files:
>
> /etc
On May 14, 2010, at 2:40 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> A wildcard transport mapping does not make random virtual mailbox
> recipients valid. You should avoid wildcard mappings and list the valid
> addresses in a suitable table, identity mappings in virtual_alias_maps
> will suffice in this case, b
> Just make sure to close stdout and stderr, to avoid writing garbage
> into the pipe between Postfix and the filter, used to collect filter
> error messages.
>
> With this level of complexity, you really should use the advanced (SMTP)
> filter approach not pipe(8) based filters.
Viktor/Weitse,
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 16:53, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Noel Jones:
>> > So the question remains the same: How can i tell postfix to not
>> > include the original message in the DSN or at least strip the
>> > attachment?
>>
>> This might help:
>> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#bounce_size_li
36 matches
Mail list logo
