Re: catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda

2010-04-17 Thread mouss
fakessh a écrit : > On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones > wrote: >> On 4/14/2010 3:42 PM, fakessh wrote: >>> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:50:34 -0500, Noel Jones >>> wrote: On 4/14/2010 1:45 PM, fakessh wrote: > On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:12:25 -0400, Charles Marcus >wrote: >>> >

Re: postcat ENVELOPE RECORDS output?

2010-04-17 Thread mouss
Curtis a écrit : >> It's not documented, because there is no promise that it will work >> the same way in a future Postfix version. >> >> However, the names of the records give a hint. >> >>> Most particularly, I'm concerned about the following three fields: >>> >>> named_attribute: dsn_orig_rcpt=r

Re: catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda

2010-04-17 Thread fakessh
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:26:22 +0200, mouss wrote: > fakessh a écrit : >> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones >> wrote: >>> On 4/14/2010 3:42 PM, fakessh wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:50:34 -0500, Noel Jones wrote: > On 4/14/2010 1:45 PM, fakessh wrote: >> On Wed, 14 Ap

Re: catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda

2010-04-17 Thread mouss
fakessh a écrit : > On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:26:22 +0200, mouss wrote: >> fakessh a écrit : >>> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones >>> wrote: On 4/14/2010 3:42 PM, fakessh wrote: > On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:50:34 -0500, Noel > Jones > wrote: >> On 4/14/2010 1:45 PM, fakess

Re: DKIM-milter only for outgoing

2010-04-17 Thread mouss
Birta Levente a écrit : > Hi all > > My postfix server is set up with amavisd-new and dkim-milter. > > In the main.cf: > > content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024 > > smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:20209 > non_smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:20209 > milter_protocol = 2 > milter_default_a

Re: catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda

2010-04-17 Thread fakessh
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:16:04 +0200, mouss wrote: > fakessh a écrit : >> On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:26:22 +0200, mouss wrote: >>> fakessh a écrit : On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones wrote: > On 4/14/2010 3:42 PM, fakessh wrote: >> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:50:34 -0500, Noe

Re: catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda

2010-04-17 Thread fakessh
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:29:04 +0200, fakessh wrote: > On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:16:04 +0200, mouss wrote: >> fakessh a écrit : >>> On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:26:22 +0200, mouss wrote: fakessh a écrit : > On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones > > wrote: >> On 4/14/2010 3:42 PM,

Re: catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda

2010-04-17 Thread mouss
fakessh a écrit : > On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:16:04 +0200, mouss wrote: >> fakessh a écrit : >>> On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:26:22 +0200, mouss wrote: fakessh a écrit : > On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones > > wrote: >> On 4/14/2010 3:42 PM, fakessh wrote: >>> On Wed, 14

how to restrict mail to only one recipient?

2010-04-17 Thread Israel Garcia
Hi I have some apps on a debian server which use to send mail using localhost on the same server and I want allow only email sent to this address u...@domain and reject all other. This is my main.cf smtpd_banner = $myhostname ESMTP $mail_name (Debian/GNU) biff = no append_dot_mydomain = no readme

Re: how to restrict mail to only one recipient?

2010-04-17 Thread mouss
Israel Garcia a écrit : > Hi > I have some apps on a debian server which use to send mail using > localhost on the same server and I want allow only email sent to this > address u...@domain and reject all other. This is my main.cf > > smtpd_banner = $myhostname ESMTP $mail_name (Debian/GNU) > bif

Re: how to restrict mail to only one recipient?

2010-04-17 Thread Ansgar Wiechers
On 2010-04-17 Israel Garcia wrote: > So, if I test sending mail using mail command or mutt rules does not > work, but, if I use telnet or nc to connect to localhost on 25/tcp > port rule works. Simple question, WHY? Because mutt et al. submit their mail via pickup, not via smtpd, and smtpd_*_restr

Re: Append a custom head via a filter, partially OT

2010-04-17 Thread mouss
Gary Smith a écrit : >> Is there some reason the Message-ID won't work as a unique >> identifier? >> > > It's about compliance tracking and tagging for specific things. > >> You can use a policy server to insert a header based on >> envelope information. >> http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_REA

recipient_delimiter is not set

2010-04-17 Thread Jim Carter
Our mailing list situaton is a little different from what normal list software handles, so I'm trying to roll my own. I want to use address extensions to identify the list. /etc/postfix/main.cf includes only one instance of: recipient_delimiter = + For testing, the user sends to , and in alias

Re: recipient_delimiter is not set

2010-04-17 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Jim Carter wrote: > I have recipient_delimiter = + in main.cf, but postconf -d reports that > the variable is empty. What could be suppressing setting it? -d is for DEFAULT. The -n flag is what you use to display non-default parameter settings. See the postconf(1) for more