On 2010-04-08 osmcr...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm running Suse 10.3 Server and looking for a script like this that
> will backup all the system config files and any others that I would
> want, this is a db and mailbox users backup for my mail server ?..
> But I plan migrating to a new server, using the
Zitat von "osmcr...@gmail.com" :
Hi all
I use to have the same problems with yahoo & aol servers, I dont know why
the time of response of this servers are so slow ? i have to wait even 5
days to mails are delivered ...
Because they offer a limited service "for free". Customers usi
Mark,
Following is the telnet log with my custom content filter:
$ telnet 10.194.99.63 10030
Trying 10.194.99.63...
Connected to ip-10-194-99-63.ec2.internal (10.194.99.63).
Escape character is '^]'.
220 Hello
HELO
250 Custom Java SMTP Server
MAIL FROM:ashiiish.sha...@gmail.com
250 Ok
RCPT TO: cp
Sharma, Ashish:
> Wietse,
>
> Following is the requested result:
>
> $telnet 10.194.99.63 10030
> Trying 10.194.99.63...
> Connected to ip-10-194-99-63.ec2.internal (10.194.99.63).
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 220 Hello
> Mail From:ashiish.sha...@gmail.com
> 503 5.5.1 Error: need EHLO command
>
Hi postfixers,
thanks to http://www.postfix.org/QSHAPE_README.html I learned how to
limit rate of sending messages which arrives via smtpd.
Now I tries to do the same with locally originating (via sendmail)
messages. It seems usual recipes doesn't work.
What are the best practices to do this?
On 09/04/2010 13:43, hateSpam wrote:
Dear All,
I have Spamassassin on my Centos 5.4. For send and receive email I use
postfix and Dovecot and Sendmail version 8.13.8. Since I have installed the
spamassassin I have not configured it. We are getting about 20 spams per
day. I want to configure it an
Hello Postfix community,
Attached please find a patch that adds support to postfix-2.7.0 for RFC
4468 - Submission BURL.
BURL requires a pre-configured trust relationship between the submission
server and the IMAP server. This patch adds a new configuration file
normally named "submit.cred" that
Vladimir Vassiliev:
>
> Hi postfixers,
>
> thanks to http://www.postfix.org/QSHAPE_README.html I learned how to
> limit rate of sending messages which arrives via smtpd.
> Now I tries to do the same with locally originating (via sendmail)
> messages. It seems usual recipes doesn't work.
The te
I need sender based selection so I used policy server to choose right
transport:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_policy_service unix:private/policy
permit_mynetworks,
reject_unauth_destination
And smtpd_*_restrictions don't
Ashish,
> Attached is the full level 5 log for your reference.
Thank you!
Apr 9 07:17:31 ip-10-194-99-63 amavis[18885]: (18885-05)
(about to connect to [127.0.0.1]:10030) FWD via SMTP:
->
Apr 9 07:17:31 ip-10-194-99-63 amavis[18885]: (18885-05)
smtp session: setting up a new session
Ap
Wietse,
Executed the command you sent, getting the following error message:
fatal: lost connection while sending message
thanks in advance
Ashish Sharma
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: F
Vladimir Vassiliev:
>
> I need sender based selection
You wrote that you learned from QSHAPE_REAME how to limit the rate
of sending messages which arrives via smtpd.
QSHAPE_REAME does not cover sender-dependent selection; and I
already mentioned that its solutions to limit the sending rate
limi
Sharma, Ashish:
> Wietse,
>
> Executed the command you sent, getting the following error message:
>
> fatal: lost connection while sending message
Then, your custom SMTP code needs to be replaced. To speed up
development, may I suggest that you consider using already-deployed
SMTP code instead o
Solved!. Thanks
The problem was external clients were NAT translated. Had my network guy undo
it and its working fine now!
Thanks again!
P.S - Victor, what is the best practice to have smtpd_recipient_restrictions?
in which order?
> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:57:57 -0400
> From: victor.ducho.
On 2010-04-08 donovan jeffrey j wrote:
> On Apr 8, 2010, at 9:57 PM, osmcr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I'm running Suse 10.3 Server and looking for a script like this that
>> will backup all the system config files and any others that I would
>> want, this is a db and mailbox users backup for my mail se
Ok, I was not clear with my first message
Here is my config:
main.cf:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_policy_service unix:private/policy
permit_mynetworks,
reject_unauth_destination
master.cf:
slow_smtp unix - -
Wietse,
Thanks for your suggestion.
Since I am new in this can you suggest some java based deployments that I can
use. I too looked for what you have suggested but maybe I didn't looked hard
enough.
Thanks in advance
Ashish Sharma
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.o
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 15:03 +0400, Vladimir Vassiliev wrote:
> Hi postfixers,
>
> thanks to http://www.postfix.org/QSHAPE_README.html I learned how to
> limit rate of sending messages which arrives via smtpd.
> Now I tries to do the same with locally originating (via sendmail)
> messages. It se
Mark,
Accepted your point, but I am actually doing what you have suggested already.
Maybe the proof lies in the fact that my custom content filter is working fine
when amavisd is not used and postfix is directly communicating with my
component. I am not receiving such problem in that case.
Is
Vladimir Vassiliev:
>
> Ok, I was not clear with my first message
> Here is my config:
>
> main.cf:
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_policy_service unix:private/policy
>
> permit_mynetworks,
>
> reject_unauth_destination
>
Ashish,
>> Your java filter sent a greeting: "220 Hello\n"
>> instead of: "220 Hello\r\n". Amavisd waited 30 seconds but
>> end of line (CR LF) never arrived, so the session was aborted.
>> RFC 5321 (and RFC 2821 and RFC 821) requires that SMTP commands
>> and replies are terminated by a CRLF, not
Sharma, Ashish:
> Mark,
>
> Accepted your point, but I am actually doing what you have suggested already.
>
> Maybe the proof lies in the fact that my custom content filter is
> working fine when amavisd is not used and postfix is directly
> communicating with my component. I am not receiving suc
Zitat von "Sharma, Ashish" :
Wietse,
Thanks for your suggestion.
Since I am new in this can you suggest some java based deployments
that I can use. I too looked for what you have suggested but maybe I
didn't looked hard enough.
Thanks in advance
Ashish Sharma
http://james.apache.org/
On Apr 9, 2010, at 9:06 AM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2010-04-08 donovan jeffrey j wrote:
>> On Apr 8, 2010, at 9:57 PM, osmcr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> I'm running Suse 10.3 Server and looking for a script like this that
DOH!
my bad,.. I saw 10.3 Server with one eye, thought he was speaking mac
Dear list,
we're trying to solve a problem here, and currently I can't figure out how.
This system puts all incoming mails on HOLD, and after some time releases it
again. By that time, it is known whether the message should go to destination A
or B. But it seems there's no way I can control tha
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 06:36:10AM -0500, Mike Abbott wrote:
> Attached please find a patch that adds support to postfix-2.7.0 for RFC
> 4468 - Submission BURL.
> BURL requires a pre-configured trust relationship between the submission
> server and the IMAP server. This patch adds a new configur
Thanks Noel for all your help. Glad to know you.
--
Klaus Engelmann
CCNA CCDA - CSCO10971632
LPIC-1 - LPI000138061
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 4/6/2010 6:09 PM, Klaus Engelmann wrote:
>>
>> Hello Everybody.
>>
>> I am running a Postfix postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2 on a C
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 12:26:47PM -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 06:36:10AM -0500, Mike Abbott wrote:
>
> > Attached please find a patch that adds support to postfix-2.7.0 for RFC
> > 4468 - Submission BURL.
>
> > BURL requires a pre-configured trust relationship betwee
Thank you for pointing out that I did not explain the contents of the
submit.cred file well enough. This file contains a single username and
password per IMAP server which postfix uses to authenticate to that IMAP
server. Typically the username is "submit". It does NOT contain regular
users'
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 11:57:17AM -0500, Mike Abbott wrote:
> Thank you for pointing out that I did not explain the contents of the
> submit.cred file well enough. This file contains a single username and
> password per IMAP server which postfix uses to authenticate to that IMAP
> server. Ty
We reject mail coming into our mail server that is not an approved address,
so I have a cron job that gets the list of approved addresses twice an hour,
updates the relay_recipients file that we use with relay_recipients_maps,
and then reload postfix.
We had a case the other morning where someone
On 4/9/2010 2:33 PM, Brian Sebby wrote:
> We reject mail coming into our mail server that is not an approved address,
> so I have a cron job that gets the list of approved addresses twice an hour,
> updates the relay_recipients file that we use with relay_recipients_maps,
> and then reload postfix.
> Example:
> messages X and Y arrives and are put on HOLD
> after analyzation, we know we should prepend a header A to message
> X, and route message Y to destination backup
>
> Is there a way to do that? I thought about multi-instance, but
> still can't get the idea how to do it.
I could use sev
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 06:36:10AM -0500, Mike Abbott wrote:
> Attached please find a patch that adds support to postfix-2.7.0 for RFC
> 4468 - Submission BURL.
> --- postfix-2.7.0/src/global/ehlo_mask.c 2008-01-08 14:36:13.0
> -0600
> --- postfix-2.7.0/src/global/ehlo_mask.h 2
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 08:44:52PM +0200, Michael Monnerie wrote:
> > Example:
> > messages X and Y arrives and are put on HOLD
> > after analyzation, we know we should prepend a header A to message
> > X, and route message Y to destination backup
Deliver the mail out of the Postfix queue to a sy
Victor Duchovni:
> > + * Copyright (c) 2010 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.
> > + *
> > + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> > + * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
> > + * are met:
> > + * 1. Redistributions of source code
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 05:09:27PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> One question I have is why would anyone send an email message that
> is 100% identical to a message that is already sitting in an IMAP
> store? It would seem that this is useful only when forwarding mail
> verbatim. Is this worth the
Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 05:09:27PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > One question I have is why would anyone send an email message that
> > is 100% identical to a message that is already sitting in an IMAP
> > store? It would seem that this is useful only when forwarding mail
>
Michael Monnerie:
> > Example:
> > messages X and Y arrives and are put on HOLD
> > after analyzation, we know we should prepend a header A to message
> > X, and route message Y to destination backup
> >
> > Is there a way to do that? I thought about multi-instance, but
> > still can't get the ide
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Victor Duchovni:
> >> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 05:09:27PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >>
> >> > One question I have is why would anyone send an email message that
> >> > is 100% identical to a message that is already sitting in an IMAP
>
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>
>> Mail client will write message to imap folder and MTA will get the
>> message. Avoid send messahe twice over the link.
>>
>>--
>>Reinaldo de Carvalho
>>
>
> Why is there a problem with sending mail to the SMTP server directly,
> instead of
Reinaldo de Carvalho:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >>
> >> Mail client will write message to imap folder and MTA will get the
> >> message. Avoid send messahe twice over the link.
> >>
> >>--
> >>Reinaldo de Carvalho
> >
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 20:51:03 -0400 (EDT)
> Von: Wietse Venema
> An: Postfix users
> Betreff: Re: Patch: support BURL
> Reinaldo de Carvalho:
> [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Wietse Venema
> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Reinaldo de Carvalho:
>>
>> IMAP users will benefit saving bandwidth ($/Kbyte) and time (in slow
>> connections).
>
> That would not explain why sending to an IMAP server is
> faster than sending that same message to an SMTP server.
>
>
44 matches
Mail list logo
