Re: overriding bl rejections: recipient_no_checks ?

2010-03-21 Thread mouss
Voytek Eymont a écrit : > I have a user getting rejects from several valid senders based on > ix.dnsbl.manitu.net blacklist, like: > > NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from smtpout6.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.166]: 554 > 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [213.180.147.166] blocked using > ix.dnsbl.manitu

Re: overide transport table / solved

2010-03-21 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 21.03.2010 00:16, schrieb Robert Schetterer: > Am 19.03.2010 12:42, schrieb Wietse Venema: >> Robert Schetterer: >>> Am 19.03.2010 11:41, schrieb Wietse Venema: Robert Schetterer: > Hi @ll, > is there a way to overide > transport table for specific > sender domains

Re: overriding bl rejections: recipient_no_checks ?

2010-03-21 Thread Voytek Eymont
> alternatively, use dnswl.org (see www.dnswl.org on how to use it with > postfix) just before DNSBL checks. mouss, thanks smtpd_recipient_restrictions = ... check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/freemail_access, check_recipient_access pcre:/etc/postfix/recipient_checks.pcre, check_helo_

IPv6 Reverse DNS

2010-03-21 Thread Martin Barry
Hi I noted that postfix is writing headers with "unknown" instead of the IPv6 reverse DNS that I know exists. e.g. Received: from merboo.mamista.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f0b:1055::1]) by tigger.mamista.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581F21100B4 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:18:00 +1

Re: IPv6 Reverse DNS

2010-03-21 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Martin Barry wrote: Hi Martin, > I noted that postfix is writing headers with "unknown" instead of the IPv6 > reverse DNS that I know exists. > > e.g. > > Received: from merboo.mamista.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f0b:1055::1]) > by tigger.mamista.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581F21100B4

Re: IPv6 Reverse DNS

2010-03-21 Thread Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
Le 21/03/2010 16:32, Martin Barry a écrit : > Hi > > I noted that postfix is writing headers with "unknown" instead of the IPv6 > reverse DNS that I know exists. > > e.g. > > Received: from merboo.mamista.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f0b:1055::1]) > by tigger.mamista.net (Postfix) with ES

Re: IPv6 Reverse DNS

2010-03-21 Thread Wietse Venema
Martin Barry: > Hi > > I noted that postfix is writing headers with "unknown" instead of the IPv6 > reverse DNS that I know exists. > > e.g. > > Received: from merboo.mamista.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f0b:1055::1]) > by tigger.mamista.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581F21100B4 >

Re: overriding bl rejections: recipient_no_checks ?

2010-03-21 Thread mouss
Voytek Eymont a écrit : > >> alternatively, use dnswl.org (see www.dnswl.org on how to use it with >> postfix) just before DNSBL checks. > > mouss, thanks > > > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = > ... > check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/freemail_access, > check_recipient_access pcre:/etc/p

Re: IPv6 Reverse DNS

2010-03-21 Thread Martin Barry
$quoted_author = "Bernhard Schmidt" ; > > > > $ dig -x 2001:470:1f0b:1055::1 +short > > merboo.mamista.net. > > $ dig -t merboo.mamista.net +short > 2001:470:1f0a:1055::2 > > 1f0a != 1f0b [facepalms] thanks! Marty

Cleanup is slow for mail received by SMTP

2010-03-21 Thread Dave Green
Postfix 2.6 running on OpenBSD works well as a mail server but there is one specific problem for which any advice is gratefully received. cleanup takes a long time to complete when email with attachments is received via SMTP but not when mail arrives via pickup. This presently causes problems for

configure policyd-weight

2010-03-21 Thread Dov Oxenberg
Hi, Please pardon the noobie question. I looked through the list archives and also whatever docos I could locate online in an effort to help myself prior to posting to the list. I just installed policyd-weight and would like to configure it alongside my postfix installation running on Debian

Email routing based on email address matching

2010-03-21 Thread Marc Falzon
Hello all, I am currently trying to configure Postfix to route incoming emails based on email address matching to a daemon I wrote. Here is the context : I am developing a simple mailing list management daemon to which I want Postfix to hand emails according to mailing list addresses it hand

Re: Cleanup is slow for mail received by SMTP

2010-03-21 Thread Wietse Venema
Dave Green: > Postfix 2.6 running on OpenBSD works well as a mail server but there is > one specific problem for which any advice is gratefully received. > > cleanup takes a long time to complete when email with attachments is > received via SMTP but not when mail arrives via pickup. This presentl

Re: Email routing based on email address matching

2010-03-21 Thread Wietse Venema
Marc Falzon: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > Hello all, > > I am currently trying to configure Postfix to route incoming emails > based on email address matching to a daemon I wrote. > > Here is the context : I am developing a simple mailing list management > daemon to which

Re: Cleanup is slow for mail received by SMTP

2010-03-21 Thread Dave Green
Thanks kindly for your reply > There is no fundamental reason why pickup->cleanup is slower than > smtpd->cleanup (other than different receive_override_options > settings in master.cf). > > However, it is possible that you're sending mail INTO Postfix at > a slower rate than expected. > > Specifi

Re: Email routing based on email address matching

2010-03-21 Thread Marc Falzon
On 21/03/10 23:11, Wietse Venema wrote: Marc Falzon: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] Hello all, I am currently trying to configure Postfix to route incoming emails based on email address matching to a daemon I wrote. Here is the context : I am developing a simple mailing list

Re: Cleanup is slow for mail received by SMTP

2010-03-21 Thread Wietse Venema
Dave Green: > Thanks kindly for your reply > > > There is no fundamental reason why pickup->cleanup is slower than > > smtpd->cleanup (other than different receive_override_options > > settings in master.cf). > > > > However, it is possible that you're sending mail INTO Postfix at > > a slower rat

Re: Cleanup is slow for mail received by SMTP

2010-03-21 Thread Dave Green
> Can you do some tests with a recent version of Postfix's own stress > testing tool? smtp-source -t bitbuc...@sigmasys.co.uk -l 5242880 -m 10 206.125.173.103 0m42.62s real0m0.02s user0m0.31s system smtp-source -t bitbuc...@sigmasys.co.uk -l 5242880 -m 10 127.0.0.1 0m8.27s real

Re: Cleanup is slow for mail received by SMTP

2010-03-21 Thread Wietse Venema
Dave Green: > > Can you do some tests with a recent version of Postfix's own stress > > testing tool? > > smtp-source -t bitbuc...@sigmasys.co.uk -l 5242880 -m 10 206.125.173.103 > 0m42.62s real0m0.02s user0m0.31s system > > smtp-source -t bitbuc...@sigmasys.co.uk -l 5242880 -m 10

Re: configure policyd-weight

2010-03-21 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010, Dov Oxenberg wrote: > Here is my main.cf: As noted in DEBUG_README, share the output of 'postconf -n' instead of pasting your main.cf. > So, am I correct in my understanding I can invoke policyd-weight by > simply adding the line "check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:12525"

strange fatal error in postfix 2.7.0

2010-03-21 Thread Security Admin (NetSec)
running 2.7.0 I have not changed anything in "main.cf" or "master.cf" Getting following error in /var/log/maillog Mar 21 19:00:18 x postfix/smtpd[8118]: fatal: invalid "-o content_filter" option value: missing '=' after attribute name Mar 21 19:00:19 x postfix/master[8109]: warning: pr

strange fatal error in postfix 2.7.0

2010-03-21 Thread Security Admin (NetSec)
running 2.7.0 I have not changed anything in "main.cf" or "master.cf" Getting following error in /var/log/maillog Mar 21 19:00:18 x postfix/smtpd[8118]: fatal: invalid "-o content_filter" option value: missing '=' after attribute name Mar 21 19:00:19 x postfix/master[8109]: warning: pro