Different header_checks depending on smtpd listener

2010-03-13 Thread Erik Logtenberg
Hi, I have an smtpd listener that functions as an MX (listening on tcp/25, accepting email for local domains), and a separate smtpd listener that functions as submission server (listening on tcp/587, using mandatory TLS and authenticated smtp, allowing relay services). Now I would like to use head

Re: Different header_checks depending on smtpd listener

2010-03-13 Thread mouss
Erik Logtenberg a écrit : > Hi, > > I have an smtpd listener that functions as an MX (listening on tcp/25, > accepting email for local domains), and a separate smtpd listener that > functions as submission server (listening on tcp/587, using mandatory > TLS and authenticated smtp, allowing relay s

Re: Different header_checks depending on smtpd listener

2010-03-13 Thread Erik Logtenberg
Thanks, this works like a charm! Small question though, was there any way for me to figure this out by myself using the documentation? I notice that for each daemon there is extensive documentation on which configuration directives are supported, but I didn't see the cleanup_service_name directive

Re: Different header_checks depending on smtpd listener

2010-03-13 Thread Wietse Venema
Erik Logtenberg: > Thanks, this works like a charm! > > Small question though, was there any way for me to figure this out by > myself using the documentation? I notice that for each daemon there is > extensive documentation on which configuration directives are supported, > but I didn't see the c

Re: Different header_checks depending on smtpd listener

2010-03-13 Thread Erik Logtenberg
>> Small question though, was there any way for me to figure this out by >> myself using the documentation? I notice that for each daemon there is >> extensive documentation on which configuration directives are supported, >> but I didn't see the cleanup_service_name directive mentioned in >> http

Re: simple filter counter

2010-03-13 Thread Gmail-teopro
Hello mouss, Saturday, March 13, 2010, 1:33:44 AM, you wrote: > Gmail-teopro a écrit : >> Yes mouss I commented -o statements because when they are enabled, >> Postfix do not recognize virtual aliases. > you should not disable address rewrite in the whole chain. only when > mail is passed throu

Re: Feature request: configurable dnsbl scores in postscreen

2010-03-13 Thread Wietse Venema
Stefan Foerster: > Now, "feature request" is actually not the right word - it's more an > idea, and probably somebody just needs to tell me it's a bad one. > > With the postscreen_dnsbl_sites setting, each site administrator can > configure a list of DNS blacklists that new SMTP connections will b

Re: Feature request: configurable dnsbl scores in postscreen

2010-03-13 Thread Steve
Original-Nachricht > Datum: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:33:00 -0500 (EST) > Von: Wietse Venema > An: Postfix users > Betreff: Re: Feature request: configurable dnsbl scores in postscreen > Stefan Foerster: > > Now, "feature request" is actually not the right word - it's more an > > id

sanity check

2010-03-13 Thread Adam Lanier
I've inherited a relatively large Postfix installation. Servers have a range of Postfix versions from 2.1.1 to 2.6.5. Master.cf and main.cf are included below. The inbound mail gateways are connected to the internet behind a load-balancing switch. The majority of the inbound mail traffic is

Re: Feature request: configurable dnsbl scores in postscreen

2010-03-13 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
* Wietse Venema : > Stefan Foerster: > > Now, "feature request" is actually not the right word - it's more an > > idea, and probably somebody just needs to tell me it's a bad one. > > > > With the postscreen_dnsbl_sites setting, each site administrator can > > configure a list of DNS blacklists th