Re: allowing a fix ip dsl user access to smtp ?

On Friday, March 05, 2010 at 13:59 CET, Voytek Eymont wrote: > I have a user on fixed IP adsl, > is that a bad idea to add his IP to my Postfix server to allow him > smtp use ? No, not if the IP is fixed and you trust the people behind that address as much as you trust your own users. > if

Re: SMTP AUTH not subjected to unnecessary check?

On Friday, March 05, 2010 at 00:16 CET, Voytek Eymont wrote: > I have Postfix with SMTP AUTH with self issued certificate, it all > works well (as long as I don't touch it..) SMTP authentication has nothing to do with self-signed certificates. > I have now "allowed" some users to use SMTP

reverse dns fails with multiple domains

Hi I host 6 mail domains. When I validate my mx configuration online with mxtoolbox.com, I got a fail with reverse dns lookup, my localhostname of the server is bsd5.homedom.local, and that is the domain reverse dns tested, ofcourse it fails hense it is not a public domain, but a local domain.

Re: retry with ssmtp if smtp delivery fails

Wietse Venema writes: The submission service (port 587) requires authentication. The ssmtp service (port 465) requires a protocol that has been deprecated for years, and that is not even implemented in the Postfix SMTP client. So that kills off the STANDARD mail ports. Ah, that's clear. Thank

Re: SMTP AUTH not subjected to unnecessary check?

Voytek Eymont a écrit : > On Fri, March 5, 2010 11:29 am, mouss wrote: >> Voytek Eymont a écrit : > >> there is no evidence in your config that auth'ed mail gets a different >> ticket than other mail. >> >> the recommended way is to enable "submission" (port 587) and configure >> clients to use th

Re: reverse dns fails with multiple domains

John WInther: > Hi > > I host 6 mail domains. When I validate my mx configuration online > with mxtoolbox.com, I got a fail with reverse dns lookup, my > localhostname of the server is bsd5.homedom.local, and that is > the domain reverse dns tested, ofcourse it fails hense it is not > a public dom

Transport table gone ?

Hello, I make rather heavy use of transport_maps as explained in and in the transport(5) section of the man pages. Today I upgraded my dozen of servers to Postix 2.7 under FreeBSD 7.3, and got the waring below : > Note: the following fil

Re: Transport table gone ?

On 3/6/2010 8:29 AM, Xavier HUMBERT wrote: Hello, I make rather heavy use of transport_maps as explained in and in the transport(5) section of the man pages. Today I upgraded my dozen of servers to Postix 2.7 under FreeBSD 7.3, and got the

Re: reverse dns fails with multiple domains

Thanks for info, I am aware of the manual and I have previus tryed to change the myhostname to soapnut.dk, I still got the reverse dns error. I gave me an idear to reverse resolve the ip address registred in mx, and the reply from that test was the dns name of my internet access. 0xbcb75b12.cpe

Re: reverse dns fails with multiple domains

John WInther put forth on 3/6/2010 12:57 PM: > Thanks for info, I am aware of the manual and I have previus tryed to > change the myhostname to soapnut.dk, I still got the reverse dns error. > I gave me an idear to reverse resolve the ip address registred in mx, > and the reply from that test was

Re: reverse dns fails with multiple domains

Stan Hoeppner a écrit : > John WInther put forth on 3/6/2010 12:57 PM: >> Thanks for info, I am aware of the manual and I have previus tryed to >> change the myhostname to soapnut.dk, I still got the reverse dns error. >> I gave me an idear to reverse resolve the ip address registred in mx, >> and

Re: virtual domains

motty cruz a écrit : > Thanks Daniel, > Actually postfix was not part of vmail group. I added to the vmail group > My configuration seem to be all wrong, I can't get postfix to deliver mail > to /var/mail/${USER} > /var/mail/(all virtual users) > do not use /var/mail/. create another directory,

Re: reverse dns fails with multiple domains

Greg A. Woods put forth on 3/6/2010 2:58 PM: > At Sat, 06 Mar 2010 14:42:13 -0600, Stan Hoeppner > wrote: > Subject: Re: reverse dns fails with multiple domains >> >> RFC does not dictate that your forward and reverse dns names match. > > Common sense and common decency do though -- since if the

Re: reverse dns fails with multiple domains

mouss put forth on 3/6/2010 3:01 PM: > so OP not only has a "generic" name, but it doesn't resolve back to the > IP. If he can get his ISP to fix his reverse (preferably using a custom > reverse), then maybe things will get better. I assume this is difficult if not impossible, given it appears re

Re: reverse dns fails with multiple domains

My primary concern is that some mailservers deny sending mail to my domains if the reverse dns lookup fails. If I set myhostname to one of my public domains, the reply string from HELO is ok, but the reverse dns lookup fails, If not possible to satisfy both issues what is best configuration?. ---

Re: reverse dns fails with multiple domains

John WInther put forth on 3/6/2010 4:18 PM: > My primary concern is that some mailservers deny sending mail to my domains > if the reverse dns lookup fails. If I set myhostname to one of my public > domains, the reply string from HELO is ok, but the reverse dns lookup > fails, > If not possible to

Re: reverse dns fails with multiple domains

Top-posting fixed. Please don't top-post here, thanks. > - Original Message - From: "mouss" >> so OP not only has a "generic" name, but it doesn't resolve back >> to the IP. If he can get his ISP to fix his reverse (preferably >> using a custom reverse), then maybe things will get bette

Re: reverse dns fails with multiple domains

running smtp test on soapnut.dk smtp:188.183.91.18 smtp 220 0xbcb75b12.cpe.ge-1-1-0-1112.hcnqu2.customer.tele.dk ESMTP Postfix Not an open relay. 0 seconds - Good on Connection time 0.702 seconds - Good on Transaction time OK - 188.183.91.18 resolves to 0xbcb75b12.cpe.ge-1-1-0-1112.hcnqu2

Re: reverse dns fails with multiple domains

- Original Message > From: John WInther > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Sent: Sat, March 6, 2010 11:13:17 PM > Subject: Re: reverse dns fails with multiple domains > > running smtp test on soapnut.dk > > > smtp:188.183.91.18 smtp > > 220 0xbcb75b12.cpe.ge-1-1-0-1112.hcnqu2.cust

Re: reverse dns fails with multiple domains

John WInther a écrit : > running smtp test on soapnut.dk > > > smtp:188.183.91.18 smtp > > 220 0xbcb75b12.cpe.ge-1-1-0-1112.hcnqu2.customer.tele.dk ESMTP Postfix > > > Not an open relay. > 0 seconds - Good on Connection time > 0.702 seconds - Good on Transaction time > OK - 188.183.91.18 r

Re: reverse dns fails with multiple domains

Stan Hoeppner a écrit : > mouss put forth on 3/6/2010 3:01 PM: > >> so OP not only has a "generic" name, but it doesn't resolve back to the >> IP. If he can get his ISP to fix his reverse (preferably using a custom >> reverse), then maybe things will get better. > > I assume this is difficult if

Re: reverse dns fails with multiple domains

Stan Hoeppner a écrit : > [snip] > A web server with a single IP address hosting 378 vitural domains. Should > it have 379 PTRs? One for the host itself and one for each virtual domain? > Of course not. > > A mail server with a single IP address hosting 378 mail domains? Should it > have 379 P

Re: Out: 452 Insufficient system storage

On Mar 3, 2010, at 5:24 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: donovan jeffrey j: Mar 3 09:49:59 mx1 postfix/smtp[1054]: name_mask: resource Mar 3 09:49:59 mx1 postfix/smtp[1054]: name_mask: software Mar 3 09:49:59 mx1 postfix/qmgr[603]: 0529299C4604: removed Mar 3 09:49:59 mx1 postfix/smtp[1054]: < 127

Re: reverse dns fails with multiple domains

mouss put forth on 3/6/2010 6:03 PM: > Stan Hoeppner a écrit : >> [snip] >> A web server with a single IP address hosting 378 vitural domains. Should >> it have 379 PTRs? One for the host itself and one for each virtual domain? >> Of course not. >> >> A mail server with a single IP address hosti