Hi all
This is probably a rank newbie question, but I've been unable to find
an answer via Google or the archives, so hopefully someone here can
point me in the right direction.
As I understand it, smtpd_banner is used for both the banner line when
someone connects to my server, and also when Pos
* Jon Tullett :
> Hi all
>
> This is probably a rank newbie question, but I've been unable to find
> an answer via Google or the archives, so hopefully someone here can
> point me in the right direction.
>
> As I understand it, smtpd_banner is used for both the banner line when
> someone connects
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 14:30 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 03:43:25PM +0530, ram wrote:
>
> > One of our clients sends contract notes to their customers and they
> > require to store all logs of deliveries/bounces by some law.
> >
> > They have requirements like
> >
>
On 22 February 2010 11:00, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Jon Tullett :
>
>> As I understand it, smtpd_banner is used for both the banner line when
>> someone connects to my server,
>
> Yes.
>
>> and also when Postfix connects to another server to send mail.
>
> No.
Ahah :) I found a reference to th
* Jon Tullett :
> > That's something different.
> > postconf smtp_helo_name
> > postconf myhostname
> > returns what?
>
> Both return the same - the hostname+domain and nothing else: mail.foo.com
> That is the default value for smtp_helo_name, the docs tell me.
It would help not to munge the dat
ram:
>
> On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 14:30 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 03:43:25PM +0530, ram wrote:
> >
> > > One of our clients sends contract notes to their customers and they
> > > require to store all logs of deliveries/bounces by some law.
> > >
> > > They have requ
On Mon, February 22, 2010 9:50 am, Jon Tullett said:
[...]
> My smtpd_banner is set to "$mylocalhost ESMTP". The localhost is the
> full localname+domain. I took "(Postfix)" out of the banner because
> I'm paranoid and don't like advertising what specific software is
> offering a service - is tha
Magnus B?ck:
> On Mon, February 22, 2010 9:50 am, Jon Tullett said:
>
> [...]
>
> > My smtpd_banner is set to "$mylocalhost ESMTP". The localhost is the
> > full localname+domain. I took "(Postfix)" out of the banner because
> > I'm paranoid and don't like advertising what specific software is
>
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 07:13 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> ram:
> >
> > On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 14:30 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 03:43:25PM +0530, ram wrote:
> > >
> > > > One of our clients sends contract notes to their customers and they
> > > > require to store a
Can anybody comment on this ugly "fix" for Umlauts in realnames?
# Already with Quotes ("=22") thus do nothing
/^From: =\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?=22(.*)=22\?= <(.*)>$/ REPLACE From:
=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22$1=22?= <$2>
# No quotes
/^From: =\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?(.*)\?= <(.*)>$/ REPLACE From:
=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22$1
ram:
> > Record "status=deferred" just like "status=bounced" or "status=sent",
> > and when a message expires, use the last "status=deferred" information.
> >
> Thats a painful workaround. :-( Writing a clean log parser especially
> when your logs can get rotated anytime in between.
For the nex
Does anyone happen to know if anyone is kindly dedicating their time
to creating a Postfix 2.7 RPM for download? I know this is extremely
time consuming but I am really interested to try out Postfix 2.7 on my
CentOS x64 server. I realize Simon was responsible for creating the
previous RPM's availab
Zitat von Ralf Hildebrandt :
Can anybody comment on this ugly "fix" for Umlauts in realnames?
# Already with Quotes ("=22") thus do nothing
/^From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22(.*)=22?= <(.*)>$/ REPLACE From:
=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22$1=22?= <$2>
# No quotes
/^From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?(.*)?= <(.*)>$/ REPLACE F
* lst_ho...@kwsoft.de :
> Not using Outlook as mailclient???
Sorry, I can't even control the internal population, let alone the
people sending mail here
> More serious, i would be interested too because this happens to us
> around twice a month from external senders using Outlook/Exchange...
S
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 09:17 -0500, Carlos Williams wrote:
> Does anyone happen to know if anyone is kindly dedicating their time
> to creating a Postfix 2.7 RPM for download? I know this is extremely
> time consuming but I am really interested to try out Postfix 2.7 on my
> CentOS x64 server. I re
On 22 February 2010 12:11, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Jon Tullett :
>
>> > That's something different.
>> > postconf smtp_helo_name
>> > postconf myhostname
>> > returns what?
>>
>> Both return the same - the hostname+domain and nothing else: mail.foo.com
>> That is the default value for smtp_hel
2010/2/22 ram :
> On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 09:17 -0500, Carlos Williams wrote:
>
> Does anyone happen to know if anyone is kindly dedicating their time
> to creating a Postfix 2.7 RPM for download? I know this is extremely
> time consuming but I am really interested to try out Postfix 2.7 on my
> Cent
Hi All,
I have one postfix mail server, and a forward server. The mail server accepts
all the mails, and forwards mails to the forward server if the mail is a
forward.
Currently, when the postfix forwards the mails to the forward server it is not
adding any headers for the e-mail for which it
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 22:28 +0530, Shameem Ahamed wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have one postfix mail server, and a forward server. The mail server accepts
> all the mails, and forwards mails to the forward server if the mail is a
> forward.
>
> Currently, when the postfix forwards the mails to the fo
On Monday, February 22, 2010 at 17:58 CET,
Shameem Ahamed wrote:
> I have one postfix mail server, and a forward server. The mail server
> accepts all the mails, and forwards mails to the forward server if the
> mail is a forward.
>
> Currently, when the postfix forwards the mails to the for
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:57:54PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Can anybody comment on this ugly "fix" for Umlauts in realnames?
>
> # Already with Quotes ("=22") thus do nothing
> /^From: =\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?=22(.*)=22\?= <(.*)>$/ REPLACE From:
> =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22$1=22?= <$2>
> # No quotes
Shameem Ahamed:
> Currently, when the postfix forwards the mails to the forward
> server it is not adding any headers for the e-mail for which it
> forwards.
As required by the SMTP protocol, Postfix prepends a Received:
message header with the local queue ID, a date stamp, and other
trace informa
Yes it adds received header. But it doesn't add the user details.
Below is the header details.
Received: from mx1 (INBOUNDSERVER [IPADDRESS])
by FORWARDSERVER (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA40E4940D6
for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 02:19:28 + (GMT)
Received: from snt0-omc4-s3.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc4-s3
Can i add this in main.cf?
I want to add the extra details only for the forward maps.
Can you give me some more info on ow to add this ?.
Regards,
Shameem
--- On Mon, 2/22/10, Bas Mevissen wrote:
> From: Bas Mevissen
> Subject: Re: Add extra headers when forwarding
> To: "Shameem Ahamed"
>
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:41:13 -0600
/dev/rob0 wrote:
> Whilst the above sounds a bit like a straw-man argument condemning
> other DNSBLs (I'll get to that in a bit), it does bring up a very
> important point, which, given the OP's post in the other thread,
> needs to be emphasized.
Certain othe
Forgive me if this has been asked (or point me thusly):
My postfix box is getting e-mails where dirtbagspam...@whatever.com
sends to someothercrapaddr...@whereverelse.com and uses a valid e-mail
address on my server for the return, so I get a non-delivery e-mail from
the someothercrapaddr...@whate
Ok, i will explain you the scenario.
suppose i have an e-mail account, s...@shameem.com, and i have setup e-mail
forwarding for this id, to shameem.aha...@yahoo.com.
If somebody (sham...@test.com) sends me a mail to s...@shameem.com, it gets
delivered to my yahoo id. In this cases, in headers
Shameem Ahamed:
> Yes it adds received header. But it doesn't add the user details.
>
> Below is the header details.
>
> Received: from mx1 (INBOUNDSERVER [IPADDRESS])
> by FORWARDSERVER (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA40E4940D6
> for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 02:19:28 +0
On 2010-02-23 Shameem Ahamed wrote:
> Can i add this in main.cf?
No.
> I want to add the extra details only for the forward maps.
>
> Can you give me some more info on ow to add this ?.
man procmail
man procmailrc
man procmailex
Regards
Ansgar Wiechers
--
"Abstractions save us time working,
I am seeing just ';' in that place.
Am i doing anything wrong ?.
Shameem
--- On Tue, 2/23/10, Wietse Venema wrote:
> From: Wietse Venema
> Subject: Re: Add extra headers when forwarding
> To: "Postfix users"
> Date: Tuesday, February 23, 2010, 12:48 AM
> Shameem Ahamed:
> > Yes it adds rece
On 2/22/2010 12:59 PM, Cameron Camp wrote:
Forgive me if this has been asked (or point me thusly):
My postfix box is getting e-mails where dirtbagspam...@whatever.com
sends to someothercrapaddr...@whereverelse.com and uses a valid e-mail
address on my server for the return, so I get a non-delive
Shameem Ahamed:
> Yes it adds received header. But it doesn't add the
> user details.
>
> > Received: from mx1 (INBOUNDSERVER [IPADDRESS])
> > by FORWARDSERVER (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA40E4940D6
>
>
> > for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 02:19:28 + (GMT)
>
I'm trying to set up my mail server so it blocks emails that appears to
come from the same address that they are going to. i.e.
From: u...@example.com
To: u...@example.com
I figured a good way to do this would be with the reject_sender_login_mismatch
which, according to the docs, not only preve
Eric Haszlakiewicz:
>
> I'm trying to set up my mail server so it blocks emails that appears to
> come from the same address that they are going to. i.e.
> From: u...@example.com
> To: u...@example.com
>
> I figured a good way to do this would be with the reject_sender_login_mismatch
> which, a
* Victor Duchovni :
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:57:54PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
> > Can anybody comment on this ugly "fix" for Umlauts in realnames?
> >
> > # Already with Quotes ("=22") thus do nothing
> > /^From: =\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?=22(.*)=22\?= <(.*)>$/ REPLACE From:
> > =?iso-8859-
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> * Victor Duchovni :
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:57:54PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> >
> > > Can anybody comment on this ugly "fix" for Umlauts in realnames?
> > >
> > > # Already with Quotes ("=22") thus do nothing
> > > /^From: =\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?=22(.*)=22\?= <(.*)>$/
* Wietse Venema :
> > But Exchange forgets the "" and just encodes
> > L?stn?me, Firstn?me
> > instead of
> > "L?stn?me, Firstn?me"
> >
> > thus the quoted-string encapsulation is wrong?!
>
> RFC822..RFC5322 do not need quotes around text inside the
> =?iso-8859-1?Q?stuff?=, as long as there ar
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> * Wietse Venema :
>
> > > But Exchange forgets the "" and just encodes
> > > L?stn?me, Firstn?me
> > > instead of
> > > "L?stn?me, Firstn?me"
> > >
> > > thus the quoted-string encapsulation is wrong?!
> >
> > RFC822..RFC5322 do not need quotes around text inside the
> > =?i
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 09:26:53PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
> if (space or special characters in realname)
>return encode(add_quotes(realname))
> else
>return realname
> fi
No, if you encode, you don't add quotes, quotes are for ASCII data that
contains special characters.
For n
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:54:47PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> The rules for display names are in RFC*22. Look for the ABNF for
> display-name, phrase, word, and atom.
>
> Short answer: as long as =?iso-8859-1?Q?stuff?= looks like an
> RFC2822 atom, it needs no quoting.
And of course, RFC 204
is there away to stop prepend: header from being added to the logs?
It's called Backscatter, and yes, it's a pain.
Try this: http://www.postfix.org/BACKSCATTER_README.html
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Cameron Camp
wrote:
> Forgive me if this has been asked (or point me thusly):
>
> My postfix box is getting e-mails where dirtbagspam...@whatever.com
> send
AMP Admin:
> is there away to stop prepend: header from being added to the logs?
No. If it bothers you, use grep.
Wietse
Huh, just found Noel's excellent response in my gmail Spam folder.
Sorry for the duplicate response.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 6:21 PM, David DeFranco
wrote:
> It's called Backscatter, and yes, it's a pain.
>
> Try this: http://www.postfix.org/BACKSCATTER_README.html
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 16:48 +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2010/2/22 ram :
> > On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 09:17 -0500, Carlos Williams wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone happen to know if anyone is kindly dedicating their time
> > to creating a Postfix 2.7 RPM for download? I know this is extremely
> > time con
45 matches
Mail list logo
