Hi,
I think I have something bad configured with postfix. I'm sending 1 mail from
"r...@dontcare.org" to "u...@domain.org, r...@dontcare.org" while domain.org is
main domain where I run postfix. This is workflow of mail:
getmail (from ISP) -> sendmail (postifx sendmail; sending to
"X-Original-To
Thank you.
I just compiled 2.6.5 with it and wrote a little tcp server with
Net::Server. I can use it in transport_maps returning a string "200
snmp:my_mail_host"
Andrea
Wietse Venema ha scritto:
> Ralf Hildebrandt:
>> * Andrea Gabellini :
>>
>>> I already looked at tcp_map, but I have some doub
Dne Wednesday 10 of February 2010 19:03:01 Noel Jones napsal(a):
> http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html
Good tip. Indeed my spamchk script uses the -t option. I tried to remove it.
It stopped all mail deliveries. Here is the relevant log snippet:
Feb 11 10:09:43 milos-desktop postfix/sendma
* Carl Brewer [2010-02-11 03:51]:
> A quick one, I hope, postfix v 2.3.3 on a server with multiple IP addresses.
>
> Is it possible to have a policy stating that email from a particular
> address goes out using a specific IP address, and everything else by
> the system's default IP address?
I'm
On 2010-02-11 Dhiraj Chatpar wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:31, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
>> On 2010-02-11 Dhiraj Chatpar wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:02, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
As for how it got there: In-Reply-To and References headers suggest
that the mail was sent from one
Hi Noel,
Thank you for your help!
I have searched our log for 9FE3785BA10 signature and found the beginning.
Please see below. I have searched the log for other similar signatures
with "from=<>"
and it seems each of those problematic e-mails starts with the two
lines as I have put
in the beginni
On 2010-02-11 Trigve Siver wrote:
> I think I have something bad configured with postfix. I'm sending 1
> mail from "r...@dontcare.org" to "u...@domain.org, r...@dontcare.org"
> while domain.org is main domain where I run postfix. This is workflow
> of mail: getmail (from ISP) -> sendmail (postifx
Hi,
thanks for reply
> From: Ansgar Wiechers
> Subject: Re: Postfix relays to all recepients
>
>
> You sent the mail to u...@domain.org AND r...@dontcare.org, so, yes, it
> should.
Yes I sent mail to both address, but when I get the mail from provider with
getmail program, "X-Original-To"
is
hi guys..
i cant send mail with my saslauth user
saslauth -d log:
saslauthd[6983] :do_auth : auth success: [user=peter]
[service=smtp] [realm=] [mech=ldap]
saslauthd[6983] :do_request : response: OK
postfix log:
Feb 11 10:17:32 smtp postfix/smtpd[6987]: connect from unknown[10.0.0.2
> From: Trigve Siver
> Sent: Thu, February 11, 2010 11:04:20 AM
>
> Yes I sent mail to both address, but when I get the mail from provider with
> getmail program, "X-Original-To"
> is set to "u...@domain.org", so I think sendmail should only send it to
> "u...@domain.org"?
I think I've solved
Dne Thursday 11 of February 2010 10:31:24 Milos Prudek napsal(a):
> Thus when I remove that "-t" in SENDMAIL="/usr/sbin/sendmail -i -t", it
> results in the log snippet above.
I figured the solution. I changed the original
master.cf line for spamchk to include recipient in curly braces in argv=,
We have a client who has an Exchange server on the end of two xDSL
lines. We currently deliver via SMTP to the IP address of one of the
lines. We would like to have postfix try the other line if the xDSL on
the first one is down.
Looking at the docs fallback_rely would seem to do the trick.
Do I
Hello,
I switch transport_maps of from main.cf.
Next I insert fallback_relay = [192.168.1.1], [192.168.1.2]
but I can see in logs, that postfix still find MX and don't use
specified hosts.
Vladislav
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Vladislav Antolik:
>> Thank you for r
Vegard Svanberg:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> * Carl Brewer [2010-02-11 03:51]:
>
> > A quick one, I hope, postfix v 2.3.3 on a server with multiple IP addresses.
> >
> > Is it possible to have a policy stating that email from a particular
> > address goes out using a spec
* Steve Heaven :
>
> We have a client who has an Exchange server on the end of two xDSL
> lines. We currently deliver via SMTP to the IP address of one of the
> lines. We would like to have postfix try the other line if the xDSL on
> the first one is down.
>
> Looking at the docs fallback_rely wo
Hello List,
there are such LDAP variables such as %s and %d to do ldap based
queries. I am looking for the varibale which is the ip adress. I want
to check my ldap for IP-Addresses that i allow relay for.
I did have a look at http://www.postfix.org/ldap_table.5.html, but was unlucky.
Cheers,
Mar
Hello,
I have the same problem, but I don't want to use MX lookup.
Is there any possibility to do it?
Vladislav
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
wrote:
> * Steve Heaven :
>>
>> We have a client who has an Exchange server on the end of two xDSL
>> lines. We currently deliver vi
* Vladislav Antolik :
> Hello,
>
> I have the same problem, but I don't want to use MX lookup.
> Is there any possibility to do it?
Only with MX lookups
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgda
Hi Folks,
I have 3 mail servers all running a postfix based setup, based on
workaround.org's fantastic article:
http://workaround.org/ispmail/lenny
I have install the python SPF checker plugin (Packaged by tumgreyspf). Here is
my minor problem:
Currently, when my main mx server is down, my ba
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> * Vladislav Antolik :
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have the same problem, but I don't want to use MX lookup.
> > Is there any possibility to do it?
>
> Only with MX lookups
And with (smtp_)fallback_relay.
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
/etc/p
Hi Folks,
Does anyone know how to make a backup MX server query the primary mx server if
a mailbox exsists, before accept the contents of the mail?
I have a problem with MAILER-DAEMON messages...
Thanks
2010/2/11 Jonathan Tripathy :
> Hi Folks,
>
> Does anyone know how to make a backup MX server query the primary mx server
> if a mailbox exsists, before accept the contents of the mail?
>
> I have a problem with MAILER-DAEMON messages...
for example using address verification:
http://www.postfix.o
On 11 February 2010 11:54, Rob Tanner wrote:
> The problem is the log files are rather large (a quarter million lines since
> the 4 am roll this morning, and there are lots of google entries. In other
> words I've already spent time just trying to find the entries. Any idea
> about particular ke
On 2/11/2010 7:01 AM, ml ml wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> there are such LDAP variables such as %s and %d to do ldap based
> queries. I am looking for the varibale which is the ip adress. I want
> to check my ldap for IP-Addresses that i allow relay for.
>
Source IP address can be checked by any tab
Quoting Jonathan Tripathy :
Hi Folks,
Does anyone know how to make a backup MX server query the primary mx
server if a mailbox exsists, before accept the contents of the mail?
I have a problem with MAILER-DAEMON messages...
Thanks
That might not be the right problem to fix. If the primar
Greetings,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:11 AM, wrote:
> Quoting Jonathan Tripathy :
>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> Does anyone know how to make a backup MX server query the primary mx
>> server if a mailbox exsists, before accept the contents of the mail?
>>
>> I have a problem with MAILER-DAEMON messages..
On 2/11/2010 3:50 AM, Dimitar Penev wrote:
Hi Noel,
Thank you for your help!
I have searched our log for 9FE3785BA10 signature and found the beginning.
Please see below. I have searched the log for other similar signatures
with "from=<>"
and it seems each of those problematic e-mails starts wi
On 11-Feb-2010, at 06:16, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
>
> Does anyone know how to "whitelist" a paticular IP when using tumgreyspf with
> postfix?
Put the spf check later in your restrictions. After permit_mynetworks would be
good.
--
THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE DOES NOT END WITH HAIL SATAN
Im trying to setup SASL+TLS+dovecot. Overall Ive
gotten things somewhat working, but have a couple questions
since Im new to this aspect of postfix.
I get 'fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms' in maillog
I ran saslfinger and it showed no mechanisms,
my /usr/lib/sasl2/smtpd.conf contains:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 03:13:52PM -0800, Jeff Lacki wrote:
> I get 'fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms' in maillog
> smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes
Do you know what this parameter setting does?
--
Viktor.
P.S. Morgan Stanley is looking for a New York City based, Senior Unix
system/e
>> I get 'fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms' in maillog
>> smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes
> Do you know what this parameter setting does?
Not exactly, Ive been reading all kinds of docs and since
Im new to some of it, Im a little confused between
SASL and TLS. I've used postfix for a while bu
Jeff Lacki:
> >> I get 'fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms' in maillog
>
> >> smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes
>
> > Do you know what this parameter setting does?
>
> Not exactly, Ive been reading all kinds of docs and since
> Im new to some of it, Im a little confused between
> SASL and TLS. I'
I setup a nagios system and i'm trying to use postfix to relay the
notifications through our google apps setup to our group.
I have turned debugging 3 on but i'm still not quite sure what to make
of the results:
>> Feb 11 18:23:18 nagios postfix/smtp[22559]: flush_add: site powerdnn.com id
>> 261
Jay Bendon:
> I setup a nagios system and i'm trying to use postfix to relay the
> notifications through our google apps setup to our group.
> I have turned debugging 3 on but i'm still not quite sure what to make
> of the results:
Don't do that. Run Postfix in NORMAL MODE and look for the warning
I think i mis-spoke
i set:
debug_peer_level = 3
and
debug_peer_list = smtp.gmail.com
prior to setting that all i was getting was this error in the log:
Feb 11 18:23:18 nagios postfix/smtp[22559]: 261085EEB34:
to=, relay=smtp.gmail.com[74.125.47.109]:587,
delay=1040, delays=1039/0.03/0.57/0, dsn
Jay Bendon:
> I think i mis-spoke
>
> i set:
>
> debug_peer_level = 3
> and
> debug_peer_list = smtp.gmail.com
>
> prior to setting that all i was getting was this error in the log:
>
> Feb 11 18:23:18 nagios postfix/smtp[22559]: 261085EEB34:
> to=, relay=smtp.gmail.com[74.125.47.109]:587,
> de
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Jay Bendon wrote:
> Feb 11 18:23:18 nagios postfix/smtp[22559]: 261085EEB34:
> to=, relay=smtp.gmail.com[74.125.47.109]:587,
> delay=1040, delays=1039/0.03/0.57/0, dsn=4.7.0, status=deferred (SASL
> authentication failed; cannot authenticate to server
> smtp.gmail.com[74.125.4
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 03:55:52PM -0800, Jeff Lacki wrote:
> >> smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes
>
> > Do you know what this parameter setting does?
>
> Not exactly, Ive been reading all kinds of docs and since
> Im new to some of it, Im a little confused between
> SASL and TLS. I've used postfix for
Thanks Sahil,
I actually had that attached but was getting bounced for too long of
an email to the mailing list.
I ran "saslfinger -c" and did not receive any errors. The man pages
indicated that it should also tell what type of connections the smtp
server should accept however this did not seem
Postfix also logged this message, amidst your verbose logging.
Feb 11 18:23:18 nagios postfix/smtp[22560]: warning: SASL authentication
failure: No worthy mechs found
For a remedy, see http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html
Wietse
Thanks Wietse,
I used what was recommended by the readme and that resulted in the
same error. I also tried a few other settings in there and no better
results.
-- Always glad to help,
--Jay Bendon - Bendon Consults
-Senior Engineer
+1-402-321-7388
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Wietse Ven
> >> smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes
>
> > Do you know what this parameter setting does?
>
After hours of digging into this, that particular message
seems to have come up because I didnt want plaintext
coming across in the smtp connection so I set:
smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous, n
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 06:22:55PM -0800, Jeff Lacki wrote:
> > >> smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes
> >
> > > Do you know what this parameter setting does?
>
> After hours of digging into this, that particular message
> seems to have come up because I didnt want plaintext
> coming across in the smtp con
Im going out of my mind trying to get relaying working
for my users who want to use my domain as their smtp
outgoing server.
Ive setup SASL and TLS successfully (I believe).
I have the following:
relay_transport = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
and in transport I have:
.mydomain.com :
I see my
I need to allow to send mails throw my Postfix SMTP server only for users
from mynetwork with valid SMTP authentication. But I can't understand how to
combine two permissions in smtp_recipient_restriction options:
permit_mynetworks and permit_sasl_authenticated.
If I write
smtp_recipient_restrict
Hi!
I got a little problem with my postfix setup. I currently have Postfix,
MySQL, amavisd-maia (Maia Mailguard), spamassassin, f-secure and dovecot
installed.
I have all my users/domains information in the database that are going
to be delivered to my pop3/imap.
But I also want to be some sor
* Jeff Lacki :
>
> Im trying to setup SASL+TLS+dovecot. Overall Ive
> gotten things somewhat working, but have a couple questions
> since Im new to this aspect of postfix.
>
> I get 'fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms' in maillog
> I ran saslfinger and it showed no mechanisms,
>
> my /usr
Hi,
I'am from the french ministry of defense and we have a opensource
project about trusted messaging system. The aims of the global project
is to build more trusted email system with components as Thunderbird and
PostFix. All of the project is call TRUSTEDBIRD with the agreement of
the Mozilla F
48 matches
Mail list logo
