I attach some pieces of logs for better understanding
/Hi there /
//
/I have a Postfix installation (postfix-2.6.5-1.rhel5) and I relay
a couple of remote ip addresses /
/(static adsl) of remote sites. /
//
/I cannot figure out how a spam originator fired some e-mails
thr
- Original Message
> From: Dimitrios Karapiperis
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Sent: Mon, February 1, 2010 7:57:36 AM
> Subject: trusted Ip address spoofed?
>
> Hi there
>
> I have a Postfix installation (postfix-2.6.5-1.rhel5) and I relay a couple
> of
> remote ip addresse
Hello to everybody,
I'm configuring a postfix server connected on internet with a slow
dial-up connection.
Basically I want to hold all emails to be sent (I'll send them
manually when I want), plus I want to relay all the emails to
different smtp servers (depends of the email).
The configuration t
Hi all,
In my master.cf I have:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o
content_filter=filtres
So, when mailserver recieves a mail, it passes through 'filter' (is a
perl-based script which control the auto-reply, quota and anti-spam).
Nice here.
The problem comes w
Jordi Espasa Clofent:
> Hi all,
>
> In my master.cf I have:
>
> smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o
> content_filter=filtres
All mail that arrives via smtpd is filtered, even if it is sent
between local users, or users in the same domain.
If some mail is not filter
On 02/01/2010 01:14 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jordi Espasa Clofent:
Hi all,
In my master.cf I have:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o
content_filter=filtres
All mail that arrives via smtpd is filtered, even if it is sent
between local users, or users in the same
Jordi Espasa Clofent:
> On 02/01/2010 01:14 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Jordi Espasa Clofent:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> In my master.cf I have:
> >>
> >> smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o
> >> content_filter=filtres
> >
> > All mail that arrives via smtpd is filtered, e
On Feb 1, 2010, at 2:17 AM, Dimitrios Karapiperis wrote:
I attach some pieces of logs for better understanding
Feb 1 08:44:18 smtp postfix/smtpd[17200]: connect from
serial.domain.tld[111.222.333.444]
Feb 1 08:44:18 smtp postfix/qmgr[27864]: 88B76180FE: from=>, size=1997, nrcpt=2 (queue act
Hello List,
i would like to have a ldap based auto reply feature in a virtual
hosting environment. I had a look at gnarwl, but it was removed from
Debian lenny due to some security issues:
http://www.downloadpipe.com/forums/linux/Bug-457279-remove-gnarwl-lenny-ftopict57832.html
Is there any ot
hi all
of course this is a non postfix topic; but i'd like to know from the
experienced which webmail is best for a postfix pop server
i'd also have it configured for user soft quota
guidance appreciated
thanks
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:52 AM, K bharathan wrote:
> hi all
> of course this is a non postfix topic; but i'd like to know from the
> experienced which webmail is best for a postfix pop server
> i'd also have it configured for user soft quota
> guidance appreciated
Postfix is not the POP/IMAP ser
Le Lundi 1 Février 2010 10:04:20, Carlos Williams a écrit :
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:52 AM, K bharathan wrote:
> > hi all
> > of course this is a non postfix topic; but i'd like to know from the
> > experienced which webmail is best for a postfix pop server
> > i'd also have it configured for u
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
Le Lundi 1 Février 2010 10:04:20, Carlos Williams a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:52 AM, K bharathan wrote:
hi all
of course this is a non postfix topic; but i'd like to know from the
experienced which webmail is best for a postfix pop server
i'd als
If the content filter does not produce auto-replies between users
in the same domain, then that is a bug in the content filter.
Completey clear now.
Thanks for aclaration.
--
I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that
brings total obliteration. I will face my fear
On 2/1/2010 1:57 AM, Dimitrios Karapiperis wrote:
Hi there
I have a Postfix installation (postfix-2.6.5-1.rhel5) and I relay a
couple of remote ip addresses
(static adsl) of remote sites.
I cannot figure out how a spam originator fired some e-mails through my
mail server
using a specific remote
On 2/1/2010 5:41 AM, Michele Carandente wrote:
Hello to everybody,
I'm configuring a postfix server connected on internet with a slow
dial-up connection.
Basically I want to hold all emails to be sent (I'll send them
manually when I want), plus I want to relay all the emails to
different smtp se
when a temp fail occurs both the too address and the top alias list are
included in the retry. The result is the email gets sent to many ppl.
Every
this else "seems to be working". I will get about 40 email (don't know the
actual number but it's more than 20) sent to jeiva(me) because testt
tempfai
it seems that roundcube is popular.
It seems to be most popular among bots as well, according to what my
apache logs say. I don't have roundcube but there are frequent
attempts to get to php scripts down in the roundcube directories. I'd
probably see orders of magnitude more if it weren't for fail
On 01/02/10 17:09, j debert wrote:
it seems that roundcube is popular.
It seems to be most popular among bots as well, according to what my
apache logs say. I don't have roundcube but there are frequent
attempts to get to php scripts down in the roundcube directories. I'd
probably see orders of
Quoting Kay :
On 01/02/10 17:09, j debert wrote:
it seems that roundcube is popular.
It seems to be most popular among bots as well, according to what my
apache logs say. I don't have roundcube but there are frequent
attempts to get to php scripts down in the roundcube directories. I'd
probabl
jeiva a écrit :
> when a temp fail occurs both the too address and the top alias list are
> included in the retry. The result is the email gets sent to many ppl.
> Every
> this else "seems to be working". I will get about 40 email (don't know the
> actual number but it's more than 20) sent to jeiva
Hi Noel.
Thanks for the reply.
The problem is not when I receive emails(because I'll fetch it with a
perl script), but when I've to send email(relay to smtp.gmail.com)
from gmail.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Michele
On 1 Feb 2010, at 17:16, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/1/2010 5:41 AM, Michele Ca
On 2/1/2010 12:55 PM, Michele Carandente wrote:
Hi Noel.
Thanks for the reply.
The problem is not when I receive emails(because I'll fetch it with a
perl script), but when I've to send email(relay to smtp.gmail.com) from
gmail.
Any suggestions?
Please don't top post.
Don't define gmail.com
j debert a écrit :
> it seems that roundcube is popular.
>
> It seems to be most popular among bots as well, according to what my
> apache logs say. I don't have roundcube but there are frequent
> attempts to get to php scripts down in the roundcube directories. I'd
> probably see orders of magnit
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:39:49 +0100, mouss wrote:
> j debert a écrit :
>> it seems that roundcube is popular.
>>
>> It seems to be most popular among bots as well, according to what my
>> apache logs say. I don't have roundcube but there are frequent
>> attempts to get to php scripts down in the r
On 02/01/2010 06:49 PM, Kay wrote:
On 01/02/10 17:09, j debert wrote:
it seems that roundcube is popular.
It seems to be most popular among bots as well, according to what my
apache logs say. I don't have roundcube but there are frequent
attempts to get to php scripts down in the roundcube dire
Carlos Williams put forth on 2/1/2010 10:04 AM:
> I recommend and prefer Roundcube.
>
> http://roundcube.net/
+1
If you're going to offer webmail, you may as well offer IMAP folders instead of
POP. JMHO.
I'm an ex Squirrelmail user and switched to Roundcube, mainly for the nicer user
interfac
Kay put forth on 2/1/2010 11:49 AM:
> In my job (hosting company) I see boxes exploited via roundcube all the
> time. Squirrelmail? Not one so far. Part of the reason is that
> squirrelmail comes with RHEL, so it's kept up to date automatically,
> while customers install their own roundcube and
K bharathan wrote:
hi all
of course this is a non postfix topic; but i'd like to know from the
experienced which webmail is best for a postfix pop server
i'd also have it configured for user soft quota
guidance appreciated
I would add from my side... Horde IMP. If you need good replacement for
On 2010-02-01 4:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> My Roundcube package is currently up to date, and it is a standard
> Debian package:
>
> [02:21:52][r...@greer]/$ aptitude show roundcube
> Package: roundcube
> New: yes
> State: installed
> Automatically installed: no
> Version: 0.2.2-1~bpo50+1
Eh? 0
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:17:49 -0500, Charles Marcus
wrote:
> On 2010-02-01 4:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> My Roundcube package is currently up to date, and it is a standard
>> Debian package:
>>
>> [02:21:52][r...@greer]/$ aptitude show roundcube
>> Package: roundcube
>> New: yes
>> State: insta
* fakessh :
> > Eh? 0.3.1 is the current version, so how is 0.2.2 'up to date'?
>
> attention
>
> 0.3.1 is the current version , so 0.2.2 is 'up to date'
That's probably some sort of twisted Debian humor .)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
mouss さんは書きました:
>
> you mean things like
> GET /roundcube-0.2//bin/msgimport
> GET /round//bin/msgimport
Not lately.
Most recently, they're looking for version info:
GET /rc/README
GET /webmail/README
GET /roundcube/README
On 1-Feb-2010, at 13:39, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> Carlos Williams put forth on 2/1/2010 10:04 AM:
>
>> I recommend and prefer Roundcube.
>>
>> http://roundcube.net/
>
> +1
>
> If you're going to offer webmail, you may as well offer IMAP folders instead
> of POP. JMHO.
Yeah, I have to say I
Charles Marcus put forth on 2/1/2010 4:17 PM:
> On 2010-02-01 4:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> My Roundcube package is currently up to date, and it is a standard
>> Debian package:
>>
>> [02:21:52][r...@greer]/$ aptitude show roundcube
>> Package: roundcube
>> New: yes
>> State: installed
>> Automa
Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 2/1/2010 4:31 PM:
> That's probably some sort of twisted Debian humor .)
I wish it was humor... Debian Stable always lags pretty seriously behind the
cutting edge release versions of a lot of packages. Then again, from what I
understand, so do RHEL, CentOS, SLES, a
> > http://roundcube.net/
>
> +1
>
> If you're going to offer webmail, you may as well offer IMAP folders instead
> of
> POP. JMHO.
>
I think it depends upon the requirements. For very simple mail and setup, +1
roundcube. I have been using horde for some time for my clients (as they use
Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/29/2010 4:46 PM, Wade Smart wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/28/2010 4:57 PM, Wade Smart wrote:
I have been using postfix for about two + years but something that was
just out of my understanding at the time was setting up relaying.
Right now I just sent from my mail client
Wade Smart put forth on 2/1/2010 7:43 PM:
> Right now I just sent from my mail client (thunderbird) but I would
> like to be able to send back through postfix to keep a record of all
> sent mails.
That's what your Sent Items folder is for.
You need to keep in mind that by default Pos
39 matches
Mail list logo
